38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, September 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Cooperative Banks will Come Under the Regulatory Framework of RBI: Banking Regulation (Amendment) Bill, 2020 [READ BILL]

By Lakshya Tewari      18 September, 2020 08:01 PM      0 Comments
Cooperative Banks will Come Under the Regulatory Framework of RBI: Banking Regulation (Amendment) Bill, 2020 [READ BILL]

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitaraman introduced Banking Regulations (Amendment) Bill, 2020 which was passed by Lok Sabha by voice vote on September 16th, 2020. The Bill is aimed to protect the interest of depositors and regulate the functioning of Cooperative Banks by bringing them under the regulatory framework of the Reserve Bank of India. The Bill also seeks to replace the Banking Regulation (Amendment) Ordinance, 202 (ord. 12 of 2020) promulgated by the President June 26th, 2020. The statement of the and objects annexed to the Bill noted, certain amendments were necessary for the parent Act to provide for better management and proper regulation of co-operative banks and to ensure that the affairs of co-operative banks are conducted in a manner that protects the interest of the depositors, by increasing professionalism, enabling access to capital, improving governance and ensuring sound banking through Reserve Bank of India. 

The amendments were majorly done in Section 3,36AAA, 36AAB, 49B, 56, 53A, 12(i) and in Section 45 sub-section (3), (4), (5), (6), (15). The amendments proposed in Section 45 were to enable the Reserve Bank of India to construct a scheme to protect the interest of the public, the banking system, depositors or to secure the banking companys proper management, without first making an order of moratorium so as to avoid disruptions in the financial system. 

Further, the bill doesnt apply to primary agricultural credit societies, co-operative societies whose principal business is long term financing for agricultural development. Further, a Co-operative bank will not be able to withdraw or reduce the share capital, other than specified by the RBI, and also that only with the prior approval of RBI the banks may issue and regulate paid-up share capital and securities to any person residing within its area of operation. The bill also proposed that the RBI may also supersede the Board of Directors of the multi-state bank for up to five years in order to protect the interest of the public and the depositors. 

The previous act of 1949 was enacted to consolidate and amend the law relating to banking. Section 3 of the said Act provides that the Act shall not apply to certain co-operative societies, except in the manner and to the extent specifies therein. Section 45 empowers the RBI for suspension of business by a banking company and to prepare a scheme of reconstruction or amalgamation during the order of moratorium. Part V thereof provides for the application of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 to co-operative banks, subject to certain modifications specified in Section 56.

Opposing the bill Congress MP Manish Tewari said that Cooperative societies are a state subject under Entry 32 List 2 of Schedule VII of COI and the bill manipulated Entry 45 of list 1 of COI. He also said that there was no necessity of bringing this as far as Article 123 was considered. RSP MP NK Ramchandran also opposed and said the bill took away the states power. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor also opposed the bill and said that it is an encroachment on federalism, while Saugata Roy of Trinamool Congress also opposed the bill and said that it is an attack on the states power. It was also said in the lower house that if any consultation was taken from the State Governments. On this, the Finance Minister said that the bill was brought by exercising the powers from the union list, not the concurrent list.

The Finance Minister in defense said that the bill has been brought since 277 urban cooperative banks have reported losses. She also said that analyzing the PMC Bank is a necessary step. 

 

[READ BILL]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-notice-to-ed-on-plea-by-journalist-in-money-laundering-case
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to ED on plea by journalist in money laundering case

SC issues notice to Gujarat govt & ED on plea of ex-‘The Hindu’ journalist Mahesh Langa seeking bail in money laundering case linked to alleged fraud.

08 September, 2025 02:37 PM
absence-of-cheque-bank-transfer-or-receipt-wont-always-negate-cash-transaction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Absence of cheque, bank transfer or receipt won't always negate cash transaction: SC [Read Order]

Absence of cheque, transfer or receipt doesn’t negate cash deal; promissory note & oral statement can establish enforceable debt: SC

08 September, 2025 02:43 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-rejects-plea-upholds-3500-aibe-exam-fee-by-bci-as-not-unconstitutional
Trending Judiciary
SC Rejects Plea, Upholds ₹3,500 AIBE Exam Fee by BCI as Not Unconstitutional

SC dismisses plea against Rs 3,500 AIBE fee, upholding Bar Council of India’s right to charge for exam expenses, ruling fee not unconstitutional.

03 September, 2025 11:16 AM
hc-dismisses-plea-for-bail-by-umar-khalid-sharjeel-imam-in-case-of-conspiracy-to-delhi-riots
Trending Judiciary
HC dismisses plea for bail by Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in case of conspiracy to Delhi riots [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC dismisses bail pleas of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in 2020 riots conspiracy case, citing strong evidence and grave role in instigating violence.

03 September, 2025 12:20 PM
elgar-parishad-case-sc-defers-bail-plea-of-accused-lawyer-surendra-gadling-to-sep-17
Trending Judiciary
Elgar Parishad Case: SC Defers Bail Plea of Accused Lawyer Surendra Gadling to Sep 17

SC defers Surendra Gadling’s bail plea in Elgar Parishad case to Sep 17; advocate jailed over 6 years under UAPA charges without trial.

03 September, 2025 06:31 PM
unacceptable-sc-says-everyone-cant-come-to-it-just-due-to-physical-proximity
Trending Judiciary
'Unacceptable,' SC says everyone can't come to it just due to physical proximity

SC: Not acceptable to approach top court just due to proximity; raps Sukesh Chandrashekar’s wife Leena Paulose over bail plea hearing.

03 September, 2025 08:03 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email