38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, August 20, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Cruelty to animals: New Bill proposes increase in fine from Rs. 50 to Rs. 1 lakh

By Shreya Agarwal      07 February, 2024 08:35 PM      0 Comments
Cruelty to animals New Bill proposes increase in fine from Rs 50 to Rs 1 lakh

NEW DELHI: Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Saket Gokhale took to his X (formerly Twitter) handle recently to share that he had introduced a Bill introduced in the Parliament to amend the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 - to increase the fine for inflicting cruelty on animals from Rs. 50 to Rs. 1,00,000.

The primary legislation covering animal welfare in India currently is the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 which adopts a wide definition of cruelty as any unnecessary pain and suffering to animals. So far, so good.

In the past few decades, man-animal relationship has undergone sea changes across the world, and in India too.

Yet, this nearly-65-year-old law - the primary, and perhaps the only substantive law dealing with animal welfare - remains as it is.

Section 11 of the Act, which provides for a long list of acts and/or omissions that classify as unnecessary pain or suffering lays down that anything from overloading, over-riding, starving, to abandoning, beating an animal, etc all amount to cruelty.

The Act thus makes the owner liable for prosecution if any of the provisions of Section 11 are violated, by providing that the owner shall be punishable in such cases.

It further provides that, an owner shall also be deemed to have committed an offence if he has failed to exercise reasonable care and supervision with a view to the prevention of such offence.

It then goes on to impose a fine which shall not be less than ten rupees but which may extend to fifty rupees, in the case of a first offence, and in the case of a second or subsequent offence committed within three years of the previous offence, with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five rupees but which may extend to one hundred rupees or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months, or with both.

While the amounts were indeed heft 64 years back when the law was first introduced, in the present day and age, due to the lack of update commensurate with time, they have been rendered as mere jokes.

Several organizations were thus running a campaign for years, seeking an increase in the fine amount for committing cruelty on mute animals.

The Bill by Gokhale comes in the wake of widespread demands for changes in the law.
In recent years, the issue of animal welfare has gained significant traction worldwide. As societies become more aware of the rights and well-being of animals, legislative bodies have been prompted to enact or amend laws to better protect them.

The increase in fines under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, is a step in precisely that direction. The move reflects a growing recognition of the importance of safeguarding the rights and dignity of animals.

The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, itself used to be a landmark legislation in India providing for the protection of animals, including regulations concerning their treatment, transportation, and use in various activities.

It also empowers authorities to take action against individuals or entities found to be in violation of its provisions.

However, due to the non-increase of the fine amount, the law itself was rendered toothless.

By now imposing heavier penalties, lawmakers like Gokhale seek to discourage inhumane practices and promote a culture of compassion and respect towards animals.

The increase in fines under the Act also serves to align Indian legislation with international standards of animal welfare.

Across the globe, countries are enacting laws and regulations aimed at protecting animals from harm and ensuring their well-being. By updating its legal framework, India demonstrates its commitment to upholding these universal principles and contributing to the global effort to improve the lives of animals.



Share this article:

About:

A wanderer, aspiring yogini and writer. Shreya is a lawyer by profession, journalist by passion. A g...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Meghalaya High Court Directs State Government to Prohibit Public Display of Animal Carcasses in Meat Shops [Read Judgment] Meghalaya High Court Directs State Government to Prohibit Public Display of Animal Carcasses in Meat Shops [Read Judgment]

The Meghalaya High Court directs the state government to prohibit the public display of animal carcasses in meat shops, emphasizing the need for ethical treatment of animals used for human consumption. The court expresses concern over the lack of compliance with guidelines and instructions regarding the display and hygiene of meat. Learn about the PIL filed by the 'Gau Gyan Foundation' and the court's call for the state government to take measures for ethical treatment of animals and proper transportation.

Can animals be slaughtered in the name of God ? : Calcutta High Court hears PIL Can animals be slaughtered in the name of God ? : Calcutta High Court hears PIL

Can animals be slaughtered in the name of God? The Calcutta High Court hears a PIL in this regard. Read to know the highlights of the hearing.

Top 25 Supreme Court judgments of 2023 Top 25 Supreme Court judgments of 2023

As 2024 begins, we at Lawstreet Journal bring to you the top 25 Supreme Court verdicts from 2023. Read more here.

Cruelty to animals: New Bill proposes increase in fine from Rs. 50 to Rs. 1 lakh Cruelty to animals: New Bill proposes increase in fine from Rs. 50 to Rs. 1 lakh

New Bill in India proposes raising fines for animal cruelty from Rs. 50 to Rs. 1 lakh, reflecting global shifts towards better animal welfare standards.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-dismisses-plea-by-aap-mp-sanjay-singh-against-up-govts
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea by AAP MP Sanjay Singh against UP govt's decision to 'close' 105 primary schools

SC dismisses AAP MP Sanjay Singh’s plea against UP govt decision to close 105 primary schools; directs him to approach Allahabad HC.

19 August, 2025 11:02 AM
sc-grants-bail-to-ex-wb-minister-in-teachers-recruitment-scam
Trending Judiciary
SC grants bail to ex WB Minister in teachers recruitment scam

SC grants bail to ex-WB Minister Partha Chatterjee in teachers’ recruitment scam, citing long incarceration; directs speedy trial in pending cases.

19 August, 2025 11:15 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-sets-aside-bail-to-actor-darshan-warns-jail-officials-against-vip-treatment
Trending CelebStreet
SC sets aside bail to actor Darshan; warns jail officials against VIP treatment

SC cancels bail to actor Darshan in murder case; slams VIP jail perks, warns officials to uphold rule of law and treat all accused equally.

14 August, 2025 12:30 PM
sc-refuses-stay-on-directions-for-immediate-shifting-of-stray-dogs-to-shelter-homes
Trending Judiciary
SC refuses stay on directions for immediate shifting of stray dogs to shelter homes

SC refuses to stay order directing urgent relocation of stray dogs in Delhi-NCR; asks intervenors to file affidavits amid rising dog bite concerns.

14 August, 2025 03:33 PM
dog-or-human-who-is-to-blame
Trending Vantage Points
Dog or Human - Who Is To Blame ?

Sr Adv Mahalakshmi Pavani expresses concern over SC’s stray dog order, calling it short-sighted and inhumane amid reports of illegal culling and absence of shelters.

14 August, 2025 05:46 PM
wife-got-pregnant-by-someone-else-during-marriage-law-still-calls-you-the-father-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wife Got Pregnant By Someone Else During Marriage? Law Still Calls You the Father: SC

SC: Husband presumed father of child born in marriage; DNA test only if ‘non-access’ proven, protecting dignity & privacy under Evidence Act.

14 August, 2025 07:05 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email