38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 10, 2024
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Cruelty to animals: New Bill proposes increase in fine from Rs. 50 to Rs. 1 lakh

By Shreya Agarwal      07 February, 2024 08:35 PM      0 Comments
Cruelty to animals New Bill proposes increase in fine from Rs 50 to Rs 1 lakh

NEW DELHI: Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Saket Gokhale took to his X (formerly Twitter) handle recently to share that he had introduced a Bill introduced in the Parliament to amend the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 - to increase the fine for inflicting cruelty on animals from Rs. 50 to Rs. 1,00,000.

The primary legislation covering animal welfare in India currently is the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 which adopts a wide definition of cruelty as any unnecessary pain and suffering to animals. So far, so good.

In the past few decades, man-animal relationship has undergone sea changes across the world, and in India too.

Yet, this nearly-65-year-old law - the primary, and perhaps the only substantive law dealing with animal welfare - remains as it is.

Section 11 of the Act, which provides for a long list of acts and/or omissions that classify as unnecessary pain or suffering lays down that anything from overloading, over-riding, starving, to abandoning, beating an animal, etc all amount to cruelty.

The Act thus makes the owner liable for prosecution if any of the provisions of Section 11 are violated, by providing that the owner shall be punishable in such cases.

It further provides that, an owner shall also be deemed to have committed an offence if he has failed to exercise reasonable care and supervision with a view to the prevention of such offence.

It then goes on to impose a fine which shall not be less than ten rupees but which may extend to fifty rupees, in the case of a first offence, and in the case of a second or subsequent offence committed within three years of the previous offence, with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five rupees but which may extend to one hundred rupees or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months, or with both.

While the amounts were indeed heft 64 years back when the law was first introduced, in the present day and age, due to the lack of update commensurate with time, they have been rendered as mere jokes.

Several organizations were thus running a campaign for years, seeking an increase in the fine amount for committing cruelty on mute animals.

The Bill by Gokhale comes in the wake of widespread demands for changes in the law.
In recent years, the issue of animal welfare has gained significant traction worldwide. As societies become more aware of the rights and well-being of animals, legislative bodies have been prompted to enact or amend laws to better protect them.

The increase in fines under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, is a step in precisely that direction. The move reflects a growing recognition of the importance of safeguarding the rights and dignity of animals.

The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, itself used to be a landmark legislation in India providing for the protection of animals, including regulations concerning their treatment, transportation, and use in various activities.

It also empowers authorities to take action against individuals or entities found to be in violation of its provisions.

However, due to the non-increase of the fine amount, the law itself was rendered toothless.

By now imposing heavier penalties, lawmakers like Gokhale seek to discourage inhumane practices and promote a culture of compassion and respect towards animals.

The increase in fines under the Act also serves to align Indian legislation with international standards of animal welfare.

Across the globe, countries are enacting laws and regulations aimed at protecting animals from harm and ensuring their well-being. By updating its legal framework, India demonstrates its commitment to upholding these universal principles and contributing to the global effort to improve the lives of animals.



Share this article:

About:

A wanderer, aspiring yogini and writer. Shreya is a lawyer by profession, journalist by passion. A g...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Meghalaya High Court Directs State Government to Prohibit Public Display of Animal Carcasses in Meat Shops [Read Judgment] Meghalaya High Court Directs State Government to Prohibit Public Display of Animal Carcasses in Meat Shops [Read Judgment]

The Meghalaya High Court directs the state government to prohibit the public display of animal carcasses in meat shops, emphasizing the need for ethical treatment of animals used for human consumption. The court expresses concern over the lack of compliance with guidelines and instructions regarding the display and hygiene of meat. Learn about the PIL filed by the 'Gau Gyan Foundation' and the court's call for the state government to take measures for ethical treatment of animals and proper transportation.

Can animals be slaughtered in the name of God ? : Calcutta High Court hears PIL Can animals be slaughtered in the name of God ? : Calcutta High Court hears PIL

Can animals be slaughtered in the name of God? The Calcutta High Court hears a PIL in this regard. Read to know the highlights of the hearing.

Top 25 Supreme Court judgments of 2023 Top 25 Supreme Court judgments of 2023

As 2024 begins, we at Lawstreet Journal bring to you the top 25 Supreme Court verdicts from 2023. Read more here.

Cruelty to animals: New Bill proposes increase in fine from Rs. 50 to Rs. 1 lakh Cruelty to animals: New Bill proposes increase in fine from Rs. 50 to Rs. 1 lakh

New Bill in India proposes raising fines for animal cruelty from Rs. 50 to Rs. 1 lakh, reflecting global shifts towards better animal welfare standards.

TRENDING NEWS

you-are-not-the-only-conscience-keeper-sc-to-activist-to-remove-protesting-farmers-from-highways
Trending Judiciary
'You are not the only conscience keeper,' SC to activist to remove protesting farmers from highways

SC declines PIL to remove protesting farmers from highways, says, ‘You are not the only conscience keeper.’ Court urges focus on pending petitions.

09 December, 2024 03:41 AM
sc-refuses-to-entertain-pil-for-bringing-political-parties-under-posh-act
Trending Judiciary
SC refuses to entertain PIL for bringing political parties under POSH Act

SC declines to entertain PIL seeking inclusion of political parties under POSH Act, directs petitioner to approach Election Commission for appropriate action.

09 December, 2024 07:22 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-transfers-probe-into-2-firs-against-bjp-leader-to-cbi-due-to-politically-charged-atmosphere-in-wb
Trending Judiciary
SC transfers probe into 2 FIRs against BJP leader to CBI due to politically charged atmosphere in WB [Read Judgment]

SC transfers probe into 2 FIRs against BJP leader Kabir Shankar Bose to CBI, citing politically charged atmosphere in West Bengal for a fair investigation.

05 December, 2024 02:10 AM
justice-manmohan-sworn-in-as-supreme-court-judge-boosting-sc-strength-to-33
Trending Legal Insiders
Justice Manmohan sworn in as Supreme Court judge, boosting SC strength to 33

Justice Manmohan sworn in as SC judge, raising the Supreme Court’s strength to 33. A seasoned jurist, he brings decades of legal expertise to the bench.

05 December, 2024 02:51 AM
cant-claim-parity-with-other-ministers-sc-to-ex-wb-minister-partha-chatterjee-reserves-order-on-bail-in-teachers-recruitment-scam
Trending Judiciary
'Can't claim parity with other Ministers,' SC to ex WB Minister Partha Chatterjee; reserves order on bail in teachers recruitment scam

SC tells ex-WB Minister Partha Chatterjee he can’t claim parity with TN Minister Senthil Balaji in bail plea; reserves verdict in teachers’ recruitment scam.

05 December, 2024 04:48 AM
have-sympathy-why-drag-soldiers-widow-to-court-sc-slaps-rs-50k-cost-on-centre-for-denying-liberalised-pension
Trending Judiciary
‘Have sympathy, why drag soldier's widow to court,' SC slaps Rs 50k cost on Centre for denying liberalised pension [Read Judgment]

SC slams Centre for denying liberalised pension to soldier’s widow; imposes ₹50k cost, orders pension disbursal in 3 months for ‘Battle Casualty’ case.

05 December, 2024 04:50 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email