38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, February 08, 2023
Top Stories
Interviews Know The Law Book Reviews Videos
About Us Contact Us
Executive

Don't want to be remembered for handing over the national capital to complete anarchy, Centre tells SC

By Lawstreet News Network      19 days ago      0 Comments      811 Views
Don't want to be remembered for handing over the national capital to complete anarchy, Centre tells SC

NEW DELHI: The Centre on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to refer its dispute with Delhi on control of services to a larger bench, saying it does not want to be remembered in history for "handing over the national capital to complete anarchy".

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud allowed a plea by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to file additional submissions.

As Mehta said, "I have filed an application for reference", the CJI replied, "We did not hear arguments on reference. It was never argued, now we are in rejoinder".

Mehta, for his part, asserted that reference is needed as they did not want to be remembered in history for handling over capital to complete anarchy.

On this, the bench, also comprising justices M R Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli, and P S Narasimha, said reference to a larger bench had to be argued at the outset, while the hearing in the case was nearing the end.

The court, however, reserved the judgment after hearing Mehta and senior advocate A M Singhvi, representing the Delhi government, for almost four-and-half days.

Earlier, Singhvi contested Mehta's submission.

Mehta, for his part, contended that when he filed the application seeking reference to the larger bench, Delhi government opposed it and the court told him that it can be argued during submissions.

"Reference is essentially on the ground that contours of federalism between Union and Union Territory require relook. It is covered in my arguments," Mehta said.

In its application, the Centre had sought reference to a larger bench of nine or more judges in the Delhi-Centre dispute over control of services.

Chief Justice Chandrachud said, "We would have looked at the matter differently, reference was never argued".

Mehta submitted before the bench to allow him to submit the application.

The bench replied, "we will consider."

The matter before the court related to administrative control over transfers and postings of civil servants.

The Centre said that it sought reference of appeal to a larger bench for a “holistic interpretation” of Article 239AA of the Constitution, which was core to the determination of issues involved.

In July 2018, a constitution bench had held that the executive power of the Union government in National Capital Territory of Delhi was confined to land, police and public order under subsection 3 of Article 239AA.



Tags:
Supreme CourtDelhi GovernmentCJID Y ChandrachudSolicitor General Tushar MehtaJustice M R ShahJustice Krishna MurariJustice Hima KohliJustice P S NarasimhaSenior Advocate A M SinghviJudgesConstitutionUnion GovernmentNational Capital Territory of Delhi
Share this article:


Lawstreet News Network
Editor
     



Leave a feedback about this




Related Posts
View All

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

Crime, Police And Law
Gorakhnath temple attacker awarded death penalty
7 days ago

ADVERTISEMENT


Lawstreet Advertisement

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email