38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Ex-J&K Chief Minister Farooq Abdullah Detained Under Public Safety Act For 12 Days

By LawStreet News Network      16 September, 2019 01:09 PM      0 Comments
Ex-J&K Chief Minister Farooq Abdullah Detained Under Public Safety Act For 12 Days

Former Chief Minister of Jammu & Kashmir Farooq Abdullah has been detained under Jammu and Kashmirs stringent Public Safety Act, 1978, that gives the administration the right to detain a person without trial for at least six months.

The Home Department of J&K issued orders to detain the Srinagar Member of Parliament for 12 days by treating his residence as a temporary jail.

News of the detention order emerged today i.e., September 16, 2019, ahead of the top court hearing of a habeas corpus petition filed by Rajya Sabha member Vaiko seeking Farooq Abdullahs production in the top court.

Dr. Abdullah would be detained initially for 12 days and the period could be extended for another three months if the situation demanded so, a senior government official told The Hindu.

The former Chief Ministers detention has been a matter of some controversy, particularly after Home Minister Amit Shah on August 6, 2019, told the Lok Sabha that Abdullah was neither detained nor arrested and was in the Valley on his own free will.

Later, Dr. Abdullah gave an interview the same day to TV channels that Mr. Shah was lying and that he had been put under house arrest. Hours later, the security officials posted at his residence were suspended.

Even though there were no formal orders yet, Dr. Abdullah had been placed under house arrest like hundreds of other political activists since August 4, 2019, night.

As per Section 13 of the Public Safety Act, 1978: When a person is detained in pursuance of a detention order, the authority making the order shall, as soon as may be, [but ordinarily not later than five days and in exceptional circumstances and for reasons to be recorded in writing, not later than 10 days from the date of detention] communicate to him grounds on which the order has been made, and shall afford him the earliest opportunity of making a representation against the order to the government.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email