38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, December 18, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Finance Ministry asks Banks Not to Levy Charges on Electronic Transactions [READ STATEMENT]

By Saransh Awasthi      01 September, 2020 05:06 PM      1 Comments
Finance Ministry asks Banks Not to Levy Charges on Electronic Transactions [READ STATEMENT]

On Sunday (August 30, 2020) an official statement was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) stating that the Ministry of Finance has asked banks not to levy any charges on electronic transactions or payments.

According to the CBDT, it received representations that some banks were imposing and collecting charges on transactions carried out through UPI. The board observed that a certain number of transactions were allowed to be free by these banks, however, every subsequent transaction beyond that was charged accordingly.

This is in violation of the Circular no 32/2019 dated December 30, 2019, which was issued by CBDT to clarify that based on section 10A of (Payment and Settlement System (PSS) Act, any charge including MDR (Merchant Discount Rate) shall not be applicable on or after January 1, 2020, on payments made through electronic modes, the press release stated.

Further on, the statement also mentions that the Ministry of Finance has advised the banks to immediately refund charges collected for any electronic transaction from January 1, 2020. Banks are also advised not to impose any charges on any future transactions carried through these prescribed modes, a tweet by the Income Tax department quoted the Ministry of Finance.

Earlier, the State Bank of India had announced to waive charges on National Electronic Funds Transfer (NEFT) and Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) through any electronic transaction from July 1. Moreover, the bank also decided to remove the immediate payment service (IMPS) charges on mobile banking from August 1.

 

[READ STATEMENT]



Share this article:



John Doe
alicejenifferze Nov 19, 2020

Good Share!

Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

madras-hc-invokes-ancient-rajadharma-and-kautilyas-arthashastra-govt-has-constitutional-duty-to-provide-legal-aid-to-indian-citizens-abroad
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Invokes Ancient ‘Rajadharma’ and Kautilya’s Arthashastra: Govt Has Constitutional Duty to Provide Legal Aid to Indian Citizens Abroad [Read Order]

Madras High Court invokes Rajadharma and Arthashastra, holds India has a constitutional duty to provide legal aid to citizens facing disputes abroad.

17 December, 2025 06:25 PM
sc-flags-exploitation-of-deity-criticises-paid-special-pujas-at-bankey-bihari-temple
Trending Judiciary
SC Flags ‘Exploitation’ of Deity, Criticises Paid ‘Special Pujas’ at Bankey Bihari Temple

Supreme Court flags exploitation of deity, questions paid special pujas at Bankey Bihari Temple, citing inequality and violation of sacred resting hours.

17 December, 2025 06:36 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-orders-aiims-to-form-secondary-medical-board-to-evaluate-passive-euthanasia-for-man-in-vegetative-state-for-13-years
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders AIIMS to Form Secondary Medical Board to Evaluate Passive Euthanasia for Man in Vegetative State for 13 Years [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs AIIMS to form a Secondary Medical Board to assess passive euthanasia for a man in a vegetative state for 13 years.

13 December, 2025 06:00 PM
endless-compassion-not-permissible-sc-bars-claims-for-higher-post-after-compassionate-appointment
Trending Judiciary
‘Endless Compassion Not Permissible’: SC Bars Claims for Higher Post After Compassionate Appointment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that employees cannot seek higher posts after accepting compassionate appointment, calling such claims “endless compassion.”

13 December, 2025 06:54 PM
property-tax-appeal-only-tax-amount-payable-penal-interest-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Property Tax Appeal: Only Tax Amount Payable, Penal Interest Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that municipalities cannot insist on penal interest for entertaining tax appeals; only the tax amount under Section 509(11) is required.

13 December, 2025 07:09 PM
sc-expands-ambit-of-posh-act-restrictive-interpretation-would-undermine-remedial-intent
Trending Judiciary
SC Expands Ambit of POSH Act: “Restrictive Interpretation Would Undermine Remedial Intent” [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules ICC at aggrieved woman’s workplace has jurisdiction under POSH Act, rejecting restrictive interpretation and reinforcing women’s right to safety.

13 December, 2025 07:13 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email