38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, January 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Finance Ministry asks Banks Not to Levy Charges on Electronic Transactions [READ STATEMENT]

By Saransh Awasthi      01 September, 2020 05:06 PM      1 Comments
Finance Ministry asks Banks Not to Levy Charges on Electronic Transactions [READ STATEMENT]

On Sunday (August 30, 2020) an official statement was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) stating that the Ministry of Finance has asked banks not to levy any charges on electronic transactions or payments.

According to the CBDT, it received representations that some banks were imposing and collecting charges on transactions carried out through UPI. The board observed that a certain number of transactions were allowed to be free by these banks, however, every subsequent transaction beyond that was charged accordingly.

This is in violation of the Circular no 32/2019 dated December 30, 2019, which was issued by CBDT to clarify that based on section 10A of (Payment and Settlement System (PSS) Act, any charge including MDR (Merchant Discount Rate) shall not be applicable on or after January 1, 2020, on payments made through electronic modes, the press release stated.

Further on, the statement also mentions that the Ministry of Finance has advised the banks to immediately refund charges collected for any electronic transaction from January 1, 2020. Banks are also advised not to impose any charges on any future transactions carried through these prescribed modes, a tweet by the Income Tax department quoted the Ministry of Finance.

Earlier, the State Bank of India had announced to waive charges on National Electronic Funds Transfer (NEFT) and Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) through any electronic transaction from July 1. Moreover, the bank also decided to remove the immediate payment service (IMPS) charges on mobile banking from August 1.

 

[READ STATEMENT]



Share this article:



John Doe
alicejenifferze Nov 19, 2020

Good Share!

Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

indias-business-families-seek-regulatory-recognition-of-daughters-in-law-as-relatives-under-sebi-takeover-norms
Trending Business
India’s Business Families Seek Regulatory Recognition of Daughters-in-Law as ‘Relatives’ Under SEBI Takeover Norms

Indian business families urge SEBI to recognise daughters-in-law as relatives under takeover norms, citing succession planning, trusts, gender equality and compliance risks.

09 January, 2026 05:58 PM
sc-bail-for-accused-added-under-section-319-crpc-requires-strong-and-cogent-evidence-not-mere-probability-of-complicity
Trending Judiciary
SC: Bail for Accused Added Under Section 319 CrPC Requires Strong and Cogent Evidence, Not Mere Probability of Complicity [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that bail for accused added under Section 319 CrPC requires strong and cogent evidence, not mere probability of complicity.

09 January, 2026 06:04 PM
pre-deposit-under-sarfaesi-act-must-be-made-before-drat-not-before-bank-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Pre-deposit Under SARFAESI Act Must Be Made Before DRAT, Not Before Bank: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC holds SARFAESI pre-deposit must be made before DRAT, not the bank, and writ petitions are not maintainable when a statutory appellate remedy exists.

09 January, 2026 07:08 PM
auction-authority-cannot-cancel-highest-bid-to-seek-better-price-in-fresh-auction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Auction Authority Cannot Cancel Highest Bid to Seek Better Price in Fresh Auction: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules auction authorities cannot cancel a valid highest bid merely to seek higher prices in a fresh auction, calling such action arbitrary and illegal.

09 January, 2026 07:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email