38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, April 13, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Fine Imposed by SEBI on 16 Individuals For Fraudulent Trading Of Rs.1.20 crores

By VANDANA KOTHARI      03 August, 2020 05:25 PM      0 Comments
Fine Imposed by SEBI on 16 Individuals For Fraudulent Trading Of Rs.1.20 crores

On Friday, SEBI the regulator of Markets imposed fine on 16 individuals of Rs. 1.20 crores for getting involved in fraudulent trading and creating artificial volumes with respect to shares of Parichay Investments Ltd. (PIL). 

SEBI in its order said that from 21st July 2010 to 30th August 2011 an investigation was conducted into the trading of Parichay Investments Ltd (PIL) wherein it was found that some individuals were indulged as a group while executing matched trades. The individuals were directly or indirectly connected to each other while some of them were involved in executing repetitive match trades, self-trades, and price manipulation.

All the 16 individuals intended to buy PIL shares, artificially increase its price, and then sell it at inflated prices. The individuals were referred to as Noticees. The SEBI concluded that the entire scheme of the noticees was manipulative and fraudulent in nature which had created a false and misleading appearance of the trading scrip. 

Eight individuals were imposed of Rs 10 lakh fine each and the other eight were imposed of Rs 5 lakhs each which constitute Rs.1.20 crores together. 

A separate order was passed in which the watchdog slapped penalties of Rs. 42 lakhs for fraudulent trading in the shares of PSIT infrastructure and services ltd on 26 individuals. The individuals were acting in a manipulative manner for increasing the price of the scrip said SEBI. This came out when an investigation was conducted from 1st May 2012 to 31st July 2015 into the trading and dealings in the companys share after the regulator noticed an abnormal movement in the price on the BSE. 

The regulator said that the normal price discovery mechanism of the securities market gets affected seriously by this kind of activity.   



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-issues-notice-on-ashwini-upadhyays-plea-seeking-biometric-and-facial-recognition-for-voters
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice on Ashwini Upadhyay’s Plea Seeking Biometric and Facial Recognition for Voters

Supreme Court issues notice on Ashwini Upadhyay’s plea seeking biometric and facial recognition of voters to curb electoral malpractices.

13 April, 2026 05:11 PM
gujarat-hc-grants-bail-to-13-year-old-juvenile-says-jj-act-overrides-crpc-in-bail-matters
Trending Judiciary
Gujarat HC Grants Bail to 13-Year-Old Juvenile, Says JJ Act Overrides CrPC in Bail Matters [Read Order]

Gujarat High Court grants bail to 13-year-old, rules JJ Act prevails over CrPC in juvenile bail matters under Section 12.

13 April, 2026 05:19 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-quashes-criminal-case-against-paediatric-surgeon-who-removed-undescended-testicle-of-one-and-a-half-year-old
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes Criminal Case Against Paediatric Surgeon Who Removed Undescended Testicle of One-and-a-Half-Year-Old [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes 20-year criminal case against paediatric surgeon, holds prosecution over orchidectomy was abuse of process.

07 April, 2026 02:01 PM
allahabad-hc-seeks-explanation-from-mact-officer-over-6-year-delay-in-motor-accident-compensation
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Seeks Explanation from MACT Officer Over 6-Year Delay in Motor Accident Compensation [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court seeks explanation from MACT officer for blocking widow’s motor accident compensation for over six years despite Lok Adalat order.

07 April, 2026 02:06 PM
calling-someone-bastard-in-the-heat-of-an-argument-is-not-an-obscene-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Someone ‘Bastard’ in the Heat of an Argument Is Not an Obscene Act: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules abusive words like “bastard” aren’t obscene under Section 294 IPC, quashes conviction, distinguishes vulgarity from obscenity.

07 April, 2026 02:10 PM
cheque-bounce-case-not-maintainable-if-part-payments-are-not-disclosed-or-endorsed-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cheque Bounce Case Not Maintainable if Part Payments Are Not Disclosed or Endorsed: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court upholds acquittal in cheque bounce case, ruling undisclosed part payments negate legally enforceable debt under Section 138 NI Act.

07 April, 2026 02:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email