38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, February 20, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Government to dilute moratorium order under Banking Regulation Act 1949 after YES bank experience

By Saumya Srivastava      29 June, 2020 08:23 PM      0 Comments
Government to dilute moratorium order under Banking Regulation Act 1949 after YES bank experience

The Central government on 27th June 2020 brought in significant changes to the Banking Regulation Act by way of an ordinance. It is with reference to RBI and Centres mandate to impose a moratorium on banking services when a bank fails or gets into financial troubles. 

The ordinance relaxes the requirement to necessarily impose a moratorium for merging or restructuring a failing bank. It means that the regulators can perform financial rescue for banks in financial trouble directly without having to ask the government to impose a moratorium which will in turn enable a softer landing in handling the crisis. 

The finance ministry explained the amendments in a press release. The press release stated that the ordinance amends Section 45 of the Banking Regulation Act, to make a scheme for reconstruction or amalgamation of a banking company for protecting the interest of the public, depositors and the banking system and to secure proper management, without having to make an order of moratorium with the purpose of avoiding disruption of the financial system. 

The Government brought this amendment after learning from the YES Bank experience. 

On 5th March, RBI had imposed a moratorium on YES Bank restricting withdrawals to Rs. 50,000. The moratorium was lifted on 19th March. 

A large number of depositors came out to withdraw their money from YES Bank during the moratorium period as a result the banks stocks were affected which caused further loss of wealth to the institutional and retail investors. 

The changes to Section 45 of the Banking Regulation Act, include after the word During the period of the moratorium, the periods Or at any other time shall be inserted, after the words other creditors the words or grant any loans or advances or make investments in any credit instruments shall be inserted, the words date of the order of the moratorium shall be substituted by reconstruction or amalgamation.

This presidential ordinance in the matter will come into effect immediately. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-invokes-article-142-to-ensure-functioning-of-consumer-commissions-in-smaller-states-seeks-sgs-assistance
Trending Judiciary
SC Invokes Article 142 To Ensure Functioning Of Consumer Commissions In Smaller States, Seeks SG’s Assistance [Read Order]

Supreme Court invokes Article 142 to ensure consumer commissions function in smaller states, directs High Court judges to hear pending cases.

14 February, 2026 03:34 PM
madras-hc-upholds-life-sentence-for-church-pastor-convicted-of-sexual-assault-on-minor-with-disability
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Upholds Life Sentence for Church Pastor Convicted of Sexual Assault on Minor with Disability [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court upholds life sentence of church pastor convicted under POCSO for sexually assaulting a 17-year-old girl with intellectual disability.

14 February, 2026 04:40 PM
sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email