38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

India and Pfizer in a deadlock, efforts to resolve the stalemate over an indemnity clause for vaccine side effects underway

By Aishwarya Gairola      27 May, 2021 03:08 PM      0 Comments
India and Pfizer in a deadlock, efforts to resolve the stalemate over an indemnity clause for vaccine side effects underway

Pfizer and the government of India are seeking to resolve the impasse over the demand by the US drugmaker for legal protection from any claims linked to the use of its COVID-19 vaccine in Indian markets.

India is still in talks with Pfizer over the indemnity clause that provides immunity against compensation to the drugmaker for any severe side effects, which is a condition Pfizer has obtained in all the other countries where its shots have been used and administered, including Britain and the United States of America.

The Indian government is in a fix and it is crucial for the government to resolve the stalemate and reach an agreement as the country struggles to secure the required dosage of vaccine with the tally of more than 2,00,000 Covid cases looming over the heads of the authority, propping routinely.

In the light of the incessant rising of cases in the country with a population of over 1.3 billion people, it can be inferred that the number of vaccinated people roughly touching 19 crores will inevitably raise concern over the humongous population that still remains unvaccinated in the backdrop of limited vaccine production.

Indian foreign minister plans to visit the United States in the coming weeks, a source cited and he could also offer Pfizer some protection from lawsuits in exchange for the distribution of its vaccine in India. However, the same is yet to be confirmed by the Indian Foreign Ministry.

Another issue being discussed between the drug manufacturing company and the government was the governments insistence on a local trial for vaccine approval, which Pfizer cannot finalize until the terms of a supply agreement, including the clause of indemnity is agreed upon, the source cited.

Pfizer withdrew its application for emergency use authorization for the vaccine developed with Germanys BioNTech in February after India Insisted on similar trials.

Three other vaccines shots on sale in India, developed by AstraZeneca, Russias Sputnik and Bharat Biotech with the state-run Council of Medical Research, have all completed small-scale safety trials.

Last month, India pledged the fast-track approval for overseas vaccine makers including Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson and Johnson. However, none of the manufacturers has sought permission from Indian drug regulators to sell their vaccines in India.

Earlier this week, Pfizer and Moderna had refused to send the vaccine directly to the state governments after Sputnik V, Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson and Johnson were approached for direct purchase of COVID vaccines by the state of Punjab, as per the directions of the Chief Minister Amarinder Singh, seeking to explore the possibility of floating global tenders for procuring the vaccines. Pfizer, clearing its stance, stated that their supply agreements at the time are with national governments and supra-organizations.

After this development, it becomes pertinent for the Government of India to procure the vaccine and bridge the dispute over vaccine indemnity.

Pfizers chief executive, Albert Bourla, on May 4th, 2021, said that he was hopeful that the government would change its policy of trials and make way for the delivery of Pfizers shot in India.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email