38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 08, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Is Indian Secularism a privilege only for certain communities? [Read PIL]

By Vivek Kumar      28 July, 2021 06:48 PM      0 Comments
Indian Secularism Religious Equality Endowments

A PIL was recently filed by Lawyer and BJP spokesperson, Ashwini Upadhyay, in the Apex court demanding equal treatment of all religious institutions by the government. It requested the apex court to direct the Centre to form a Common Charter for Religious and Charitable Institutions and Uniform Code for Religious-Charitable Endowments. 

The Plea further called for action against the inequal treatment of Hindu, Sikh, Jain, and Buddhist worship places by state governments. 

State governments own and control the management of Temples and Gurdwaras, control and operate their assets, take their money, and even have major say in events like Puja and other rituals. At the same time, Mosques and Churches, in India, are owned and operated by the respective religious organizations. The governments do not charge them anything, instead they provide them monetary support and other benefits as well.

In 2002, from 2 lakh temples in Karnataka, the government collected Rs. 72 crores but returned merely Rs. 10 crores for repair and maintenance. On the Other hand, it granted Rs. 50 crores for the Madrasas and Rs. 10 crores for the churches

Notably, India still follows age old laws which were made by Britishers. One such Act is the Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Act which was created in 19th century to control and regulate Hindu temples. 

Even after Independence, politicians concocted this anti-secular law to Provincialize the administration of Hindu Religious Institutions. 

Under it, the state governments have taken over thousands of temples. This has in effect allowed loot of temple wealth and resources of temples by state governments over decades. 

States not only collect taxes, manage assets, impose State control in temples, but they also often appoint non-Hindus, or even anti-Hindu, bureaucrats, or politicians over Hindu temples. This has led to deterioration of many ancient temples. 

A UNESCO report in 2017 cautioned that Tamil Nadu government, which manages around 30 thousand temples, neither has the capacity nor qualified experts to carry out conservation, leading to massacre of ancient temples. (Source: TOI)


Not only are these laws hurt religious sentiments of Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists, but they also violate Article 14, 15, and 26 and go against the basic structure of the Constitution of India. Article 26 gives a natural right to all communities to manage their institutions, but Hindus, Jains, Sikhs, and Buddhists have been denied this privilege. 

We need to ask ourselves, what kind of a democracy we live in? More importantly we must ask the government, why does it wear the secularism cloak when asking for votes and then discriminate between communities. 

Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, and Sikhs have similar rights to own, acquire, administer movable-immovable properties of their religious places like Muslims and Christians and State cannot abridge it.  Ashwini Upadhyay states  in the PIL.

As the plea states, it is thus necessary that the Centre drafts a Common Charter for Religious and Charitable Institutions and Uniform Code for Religious-Charitable Endowments to ensure that all religious institutions are treated equally, and that they are regulated properly so that the culture and history of this great land can be preserved.

 

[Read PIL]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

register-entry-not-mandatory-for-oppression-mismanagement-plea-under-companies-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Register Entry Not Mandatory for Oppression, Mismanagement Plea Under Companies Act: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules formal entry in register of members is not mandatory to maintain oppression and mismanagement petitions under Companies Act.

07 May, 2026 10:51 AM
law-firm-terminates-partner-facing-pocso-charges-for-alleged-assault-of-six-year-old-daughter-mother-challenges-bail-before-bombay-hc
Trending Judiciary
Law Firm Terminates Partner Facing POCSO Charges for Alleged Assault of Six-Year-Old Daughter; Mother Challenges Bail Before Bombay High Court

A Leading Law firm terminates partner accused under POCSO Act for alleged assault of six-year-old daughter; Bombay High Court to hear bail challenge.

07 May, 2026 11:00 AM

TOP STORIES

madras-hc-shields-ayushmann-khurrana-and-sara-ali-khan-starrer-pati-patni-aur-woh-do-from-piracy-grants-ad-interim-injunction-against-isps-and-cable-tv-operators-ahead-of-release
Trending CelebStreet
Madras HC Shields Ayushmann Khurrana and Sara Ali Khan Starrer “Pati Patni Aur Woh Do” from Piracy; Grants Ad Interim Injunction Against ISPs and Cable TV Operators Ahead of Release [Read Order]

Madras High Court grants anti-piracy injunction for Pati Patni Aur Woh Do, restraining ISPs and cable operators ahead of its May 15, 2026 release.

02 May, 2026 02:35 PM
bombay-hc-quashes-fir-against-shekhar-suman-and-bharti-singh-over-ya-allah-rasgulla-dahi-bhalla
Trending CelebStreet
Bombay HC Quashes FIR Against Shekhar Suman and Bharti Singh Over “Ya Allah! Rasgulla! Dahi Bhalla!” [Read Order]

Bombay High Court quashes 2010 FIR against Shekhar Suman and Bharti Singh, holding “Rasgulla” and “Dahi Bhalla” are neutral, not religiously offensive.

02 May, 2026 03:51 PM
allahabad-hc-dismisses-plea-seeking-fir-against-rahul-gandhi-over-fight-against-indian-state-remark
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Rahul Gandhi Over ‘Fight Against Indian State’ Remark

Allahabad High Court dismisses plea seeking FIR against Rahul Gandhi over his ‘fight against Indian State’ remark, citing lack of grounds for prosecution.

02 May, 2026 04:04 PM
we-have-moved-away-from-the-era-of-paper-trails-cji-surya-kant-declares-sikkim-indias-first-paperless-state-judiciary
Trending Legal Insiders
“We Have Moved Away from the Era of Paper Trails”: CJI Surya Kant Declares Sikkim India’s First Paperless State Judiciary

CJI Surya Kant declares Sikkim India’s first paperless judiciary, highlighting technology’s role in improving access to justice and efficiency.

02 May, 2026 04:14 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email