The Centre and the Indian Army has told the Delhi High Court that right to marry is not a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and that it is no where written or proved that life of person would be miserable or unhealthy without marriage.
An affidavit was filed by the Centre in a public interest litigation petition moved by advocate Kush Kalra challenging the restriction on married males and females in applying for recruitment to Judge Advocate General (JAG) department in violation of
Article 14,
16 and
21 of the
Constitution. Defending the established policy of inducting only unmarried men and women to JAG department in the Indian Army, the Centre contended that the Indian Army is supportive of the institution of marriage and clarified that the marriage is restricted only till the pre-commission training is completed and commission is granted.
Further, explaining the rationale behind the policy, the Centre stated that the decision was imperative to “
ensure basic military training” as the training involves a high amount of physical and mental stress, strain and rigours of military life. Denying all claims of institutional discrimination on gender grounds as well as violation of
Article 14 of the Constitution, the Centre said that "In Indian Army, both males and females are treated equally and granted equal opportunity in the matter of appointment…. Once the unmarried lady cadets and gentlemen cadets complete their training and are granted commission, there is no bar for getting married or its natural consequences viz pregnancy etc and service benefits viz maternity leave, child care leave, paternity leave or married accommodation etc. Thus there is no discrimination on the ground of marital status.” The Centre also mentioned in the affidavit that any change in the policy which bars married males and females from recruitment in JAG department and other entries across the board will affect security of entire nation and the interest of 130 crore people cannot be challenged or compromised for merely thousands of people applying for JAG department. The High Court has posted the matter for further hearing on July 18, 2019.
Delhi HC shifts Caravan Defamation Case to Patiala House Court
Judiciary
Jan 19, 2021
Gautami Chakravarty
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
6 Shares
The Delhi High recently shifted the criminal defamation case against The Caravan on Friday, 15th January, 2021 to Patiala House District Court. The petitioner in this case is Vivek Doval, son of National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, and the respondent is The Caravan Magazine and others.The order was passed by a Single Judge Bench consisting of Justice Mukta Gupta.Earlier, the matter was heard by a Rouse Avenue District Court exclusively dealing with matters relating to lawmakers. Congress...
Delhi HC Orders All Subordinate Courts To Sit Physically on Alternate Day Basis [READ ORDER]
Judiciary
Jan 18, 2021
Gautami Chakravarty
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
2 Shares
The Registrar General of the Delhi High Court has instructed the Principal District & Sessions Judges and the Principal Judge, Family Court to start physical hearings on an alternate day basis from 18.01.2020.It will be done through video conferencing on non physical days. The order directs the Principal District & Sessions Judges and the Principal Judge, Family Court to prepare a roster of all other subordinate courts within their respective districts to ensure that the...
Facebook Comments