38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, December 11, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Jammu And Kashmir Residents Approach Supreme Court Challenging Delimitation Exercise In The Union Territory

By LawStreet News Network      30 March, 2022 03:07 AM      0 Comments
Jammu And Kashmir Residents Approach Supreme Court

Two residents of the Union Territory  of Jammu and Kashmir have moved the Supreme Court to challenge the directions of the Central Government given in March 2020 for appointing the delimitation commission to redraw Lok Sabha and assembly constituencies of the Union Territory Jammu and Kashmir.

BACKGROUND 

Delimitation is the an essential process for election through which boundaries of Lok Sabha and state assembly seats are redrawn in order to represent the actual changes in the population. This process needs to be conducted before the elections are held so that the population can be properly represented in the elections. 

CONTENTIONS OF THE PLAINTIFF 

The plea has been filed through M/S LAWFIC and it has been drafted by Senior Advocate Ravi Shankar Jandhyala.

Haji Abdul Gani Khan and Dr. Mohammad Ayub Mattoo have filed a petition seeking a ruling that the Delimitation Commission's constitution is invalid.
Importantly, the plea questions as to when Art. 170 of the Constitution of India provides that the next delimitation in the country will be taken up after 2026, then why UT of Jammu and Kashmir had been singled out. In this regard, the plea further argues that any move to increase the number of seats in Jammu and Kashmir must be preceded by a Constitutional Amendment, besides the amendment of Elections Laws, namely, the Delimitation Act, 2002 and the Representation of People Act, 1950. 

NOTIFICATION OF THE GOVERNMENT 

the Union Government had issued a notification on March 6, 2020, in the exercise of power under section 3 of the Delimitation Act, 2002, constituting a Delimitation Commission, with Justice (Retd) Ranjana Prakash Desai as Chairperson, for the purpose of delimitation of Assembly and Parliamentary constituencies in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and the state of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Nagaland, for a period of one year.

In another notification  issued on March 3, 2021 the term of the Delimitation Commission was extended by one year and omitted the names of the four states, and limited the scope of delimitation exercise to only UT of Jammu and Kashmir. 

ULTRA VIRES ACT 

The plea also claims that the increase in the number of seats in the Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir from 107 to 114 (including 24 seats in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir) as provided in the J&K Reorganisation Act, 2019, is in violation of constitutional provisions such as Articles 81, 82, 170, 330, and 332, as well as statutory provisions such as Section 63 of the Jammu & Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019.

OMMISSION OF CERTAIN STATES 

The petitioners claim that the Central Government's decision to form the Delimitation Commission to take up delimitation in the UT of J&K and the states of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Nagaland violates Art 14 because the Government's order mentions two distinct population ratios. 

The plea also claims that the Central Government's order of March 3, 2021, excluding the states of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Nagaland from the delimitation process and deciding to conduct delimitation only for the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir is unconstitutional because it amounts to classification.

DUTY OF ELECTION COMMISSION 

The plea also states that it is only the Election Commission that must carry out the process of delimitation (for necessary updation) after the Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Delimitation Order, 2008 is notified.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

44-retired-judges-defend-cji-warn-judicial-independence-at-risk-amid-rohingya-case-row
Trending Legal Insiders
44 Retired Judges Defend CJI, Warn ‘Judicial Independence at Risk’ Amid Rohingya Case Row [Read Letter]

44 retired judges back the CJI in the Rohingya case row, warning that attacks on judicial scrutiny threaten independence and calling for a court-monitored SIT probe.

10 December, 2025 12:15 AM
pakistan-secures-12-billion-imf-disbursement-amid-economic-recovery-and-climate-reform-push
Trending International
Pakistan Secures $1.2 Billion IMF Disbursement Amid Economic Recovery and Climate Reform Push

IMF approves $1.2 billion for Pakistan, boosting economic recovery, fiscal reforms and climate resilience under the EFF and RSF programmes.

10 December, 2025 01:17 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-orders-30-reservation-for-women-in-all-state-bar-councils-bci-rules-deemed-amended
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders 30% Reservation for Women in All State Bar Councils; BCI Rules ‘Deemed Amended’ [Read Order]

Supreme Court orders BCI to ensure 30% reservation for women in all State Bar Councils, deeming rules amended to achieve gender parity in legal governance.

05 December, 2025 04:47 PM
sc-holds-working-from-home-not-determinative-factor-in-child-custody-dismisses-mothers-appeal
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Working From Home Not Determinative Factor In Child Custody, Dismisses Mother’s Appeal [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that working from home cannot determine child custody, dismissing the mother’s appeal while upholding the father’s custody and visitation rights.

05 December, 2025 05:22 PM
delhi-hc-rejects-interim-injunction-to-novo-nordisk-in-semaglutide-patent-case-against-dr-reddys
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Rejects Interim Injunction To Novo Nordisk in Semaglutide Patent Case Against Dr. Reddy’s [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court denies Novo Nordisk’s interim injunction in the Semaglutide patent suit, allowing Dr. Reddy’s to manufacture and export to non-patented markets.

05 December, 2025 05:44 PM
sc-discharges-accused-in-property-dispute-case-emphasizes-need-for-strong-suspicion
Trending Judiciary
SC Discharges Accused in Property Dispute Case, Emphasizes Need for ‘Strong Suspicion’ [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court discharges accused in Kolkata property dispute, holding that criminal trials require strong suspicion based on legally tenable evidence.

05 December, 2025 06:23 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email