38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Kerala Government Decides to Amend the Kerala Police Act, 2011 to include intermediation, defamation, or insulting of any person through social media as a punishable offence

By Neha Bharti      24 October, 2020 10:21 PM      0 Comments
Kerala Government Decides to Amend the Kerala Police Act, 2011 to include intermediation, defamation, or insulting of any person through social media as a punishable offence

Recently, the Kerala Government has decided to amend the Kerala Police Act, 2011 to include intermediation, defamation, or insulting of any person through social media as a punishable offence.

The Kerala Cabinet has also decided to recommend to the Governor to promulgate an ordinance for insertion of a new section in the Kerala Police Act, 2011 i.e. Section 118 A. Governor has the power to promulgate an ordinance when the state legislature is on recess under Article 213 Constitution of India, 1950. Section 118A of the Kerala Police Act, 2011 says that "anyone who produces content publishes or propagates it through any means of communication with an intention to threaten, insult or harm the reputation of an individual will be punished with imprisonment of 5 years or a fine of 10,000 or with both"

In a press release, the Government has said that they are concerned about the rise in the incidence of crime which is perpetrated through social media. The present law is incapable to deal with such crime especially after the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2002, and Section 118(d) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011. So this is the need of the hour to bring a new law that can control the incidence of crime perpetrated through social media. In Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2013) 12 SCC 73 the Supreme Court has held that Section 118(d) of the Kerala Police Act,2011 violates Article 19 (1) (a) of Constitution of India, 1950 (Freedom of Speech and Expression). The Court while striking this provision as unconstitutional said that "the offence of causing annoyance in an indecent manner suffers from the same type of vagueness and overbreadth. The Court has however rejected the challenge against the provision on the ground of legislative incompetence. The penalty created for causing annoyance in an indecent manner in pith and substance would fall within Entry 1 List III (Concurrent List) which speaks of criminal law and this is purely in any case within the competence of State Legislature. 

While deciding this Government has taken into mind that the observations made by the Kerala High Court in an order passed on May 12, 2020. While disposing of a bail application, Justice PV Kunhikrishna had opined that "The State has to legislate appropriate enactments to curtail the social media war". The Court was considering the bail application of a female anchor of an online news channel who assaults a man who has published a YouTube video with vulgar comments about the woman by dubbing artists Bhagyalakshmi and other two women -Diya Sana and SreelakshmiArackel. This video has generated a huge controversy in the State. This is the main reason for the insertion of new Section 118(A) and amendment in the Kerala Police Act, 2011. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-upholds-joint-insolvency-proceedings-against-interlinked-real-estate-companies
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Joint Insolvency Proceedings Against Interlinked Real Estate Companies [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds joint insolvency proceedings against interlinked real estate companies, allowing a single IBC petition for linked projects.

04 February, 2026 11:38 AM
sc-holds-courts-can-extend-arbitrators-mandate-even-after-award-is-rendered-clarifies-scope-of-section-29a-of-arbitration-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Courts Can Extend Arbitrator’s Mandate Even After Award Is Rendered, Clarifies Scope of Section 29A of Arbitration Act

Supreme Court rules courts can extend arbitrator’s mandate even after award, clarifying Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

04 February, 2026 12:53 PM
if-you-cant-follow-our-constitution-leave-india-supreme-court-to-meta-whatsapp-on-privacy-policy
Trending Judiciary
If You Can’t Follow Our Constitution, Leave India: Supreme Court to Meta, WhatsApp on Privacy Policy

Supreme Court warns Meta and WhatsApp to follow India’s Constitution or leave, slams privacy policy and data sharing with Meta companies.

04 February, 2026 01:30 PM
sc-to-rule-on-trump-era-emergency-tariffs-as-broader-us-tariff-landscape-shifts
Trending Judiciary
SC to Rule on Trump-Era Emergency Tariffs as Broader U.S. Tariff Landscape Shifts

Supreme Court to review Trump-era emergency tariffs under IEEPA, a ruling that could reshape U.S. trade policy and impact global markets and importers.

04 February, 2026 01:37 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email