38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, May 29, 2024
Executive

Law Commission Recommends Judicial Discretion for Age of Consent Under POCSO Act [Read Law Commission Report]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      30 September, 2023 01:02 PM      0 Comments
Law Commission Recommends Judicial Discretion for Age of Consent Under POCSO Act Read Law Commission Report

NEW DELHI: The Law Commission has said that it is not advisable to tinker with the existing age of consent under the POCSO Act, though judicial discretion may be applied in sentencing in cases where there is tacit approval of relationship by the girls falling between 16 to 18 years of age.

The panel suggested for amending Sections 4 and 8 of the POCSO Act related to punishment for penetrative sexual assault and sexual assault respectively by giving discretion to the Special Court to impose lesser sentence where is above 16 years of age after being satisfied of intimate relationship.

It also favoured bringing in similar amendment to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and the Indian Penal Code.

In its 283 rd report, the Commission led by Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, former Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court said that reducing the age of consent will have a direct and negative bearing on the fight against child marriage and child trafficking. It also felt carving out a limited exception for sexual relations with a child above 16 years is equally concerning and prone to misuse.

"The consent of a child is no consent and reading the same would be deeply problematic. All children deserve the protection of the special law enacted for this very purpose and diluting the age of consent will deprive a significant portion of the child population, especially young girls aged 16 to 18 years, of the protection and expose them to unchecked exploitation," it said.

The Commission said while giving a blanket exemption to consensual sexual acts by persons above 16 years may seem like a panacea for the situation “we are faced with, however, the same will lead to many unintended consequences of much severe nature”.

At present the age of consent for sexual intercourse is 18 years under the POCSO Act.

The Commission referred to the instances of the increasing incidents of grooming and cyber-crimes such as sextortion, which are classic examples of how children in this vulnerable age group can be trapped and exploited.

"There cannot be any automatic decriminalisation of sexual acts with a person between the age of 16 to 18 years and carving out a limited judicial discretion at the stage of sentencing is a more reasonable approach. Such a discretion bestowed on the Special Court can be exercisable in cases where there appears to be factual consent on part of a child above the age of 16 years," it said.

The Commission said judicial discretion once vested will enable the Special POCSO Courts to try the cases expeditiously and the High Courts will not be plagued with bail applications, quashing proceedings and writ petitions.

The Commission examined the matter and prepared its report entitled as 'Age of Consent under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012' upon a reference from the High Court of Kamataka (Dharwad bench) by a letter of November 9, 2022.

The HC had asked the Commission to rethink on the age criteria for consent, taking into consideration the rising number of cases relating to minor girls above the age of 16 years falling in love, eloping and having sexual intercourse with the boy, thereby attracting the provisions of the POCSO Act and the Indian Penal Code.

"After a careful review of existing child protection laws, various judgements and considering the maladies of child abuse, child trafficking and child prostitution that plague our society, the Commission is of the measured view that it is not advisable to tinker with the existing age of consent under the POCSO Act," it said.

However, it said that certain amendments need to be brought in the POCSO Act to remedy the situation in cases wherein there is tacit approval in fact though not consent in law on part of the child aged between 16 to 18 years.

"This is so because in our considered opinion, such cases do not merit to be dealt with the same severity as the cases that were ideally imagined to fall under the POCSO Act" it added.

The Commission, further said, introducing guided judicial discretion in the matter of sentencing in such cases will ensure that the law is balanced, thus safeguarding the best interests of the child.

The panel also pointed out there is general lack of awareness amongst the children as to what constitutes child sexual abuse and its various forms.

"Even if the child knows that the act done is wrong and exploitative, a large number of them never report the same to their parents or even close friends out of fear of inviting further trouble for themselves and their family. Thus, the supportive mechanism available to children clearly requires strengthening. Further, awareness regarding sex, consequences of engaging in sex at an early age, information about contraception and safe sexual behaviour along with awareness regarding the POCSO Act is also the need of the hour," it said.

In its view, the panel's report said, "The Commission is of the opinion that discretionary power of the Special Court in ascertaining consent and if discretion is to be exercised at all, ought to be limited and guided so as to prevent misapplication. The issue whether factual consent exists cannot be left to the hands of investigating agencies as there are more dangers of abuse and misapplication in such cases. Further, in order to ensure that there is no unnecessary harassment or protracted proceedings, the current system of investigation and judicial determination have to be strengthened and improved in order to ensure expeditious trial as envisaged under the POCSO Act".

[Read Law Commission Report]



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

SC Issues Notice to Centre on PIL by Ashwini Upadhyay to Debar Candidates From Contesting Polls on Framing of Charges  [Read Petition] SC Issues Notice to Centre on PIL by Ashwini Upadhyay to Debar Candidates From Contesting Polls on Framing of Charges [Read Petition]

A bench of Justices K M Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy sought a response from the Union government's Law and Justice and Home Ministries, and the Election Commission on plea by BJP leader and advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay.

Amicus curiae supports plea for permanent disqualification of convicted lawmakers [Read Report] Amicus curiae supports plea for permanent disqualification of convicted lawmakers [Read Report]

Explore the plea for permanent disqualification of convicted lawmakers in India. Discover why legal experts argue that limiting disqualification to six years is arbitrary and violates Article 14 of the Constitution. Dive into the debate surrounding this crucial issue.

Supreme Court Frees Death Row Convicts Due to Flawed Investigation in 2013 Kidnap Murder Case [Read Judgment] Supreme Court Frees Death Row Convicts Due to Flawed Investigation in 2013 Kidnap Murder Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court acquits two death row convicts in a 2013 kidnap-cum-murder case, highlighting the urgent need for a reliable police investigation code. Learn how shocking lapses led to this historic decision.

Law Commission Recommends Judicial Discretion for Age of Consent Under POCSO Act [Read Law Commission Report] Law Commission Recommends Judicial Discretion for Age of Consent Under POCSO Act [Read Law Commission Report]

Learn about the Law Commission's stance on the age of consent under the POCSO Act, its recommendations for judicial discretion in sentencing, and the potential impact on child protection and exploitation. Explore the complexities surrounding consent and child sexual abuse laws.

TRENDING NEWS

battle-over-butter-chicken-moti-mahal-takes-daryaganj-to-court-in-trademark-showdown
Trending Business
Battle Over Butter Chicken: Moti Mahal Takes Daryaganj to Court in Trademark Showdown

Moti Mahal and Daryaganj restaurants clash in Delhi High Court over trademark claims, each asserting they invented Butter Chicken and Dal Makhani.

28 May, 2024 11:33 AM
punjab-and-haryana-high-court-upholds-eds-arrest-of-aap-mla-dismisses-plea-challenging-detention
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds ED's Arrest of AAP MLA, Dismisses Plea Challenging Detention [Read Order]

Punjab and Haryana High Court dismisses AAP MLA Jaswant Singh's plea against his ED arrest, ruling it was in line with Section 19(1) of the PMLA.

28 May, 2024 11:56 AM

TOP STORIES

no-legal-mandate-for-uploading-of-form-17c-on-website-or-handing-over-to-anyone-other-than-candidate-or-agent-ec-tells-sc
Trending Judiciary
No legal mandate for uploading of Form 17C on website or handing over to anyone other than candidate or agent, EC tells SC

EC tells SC there's no legal mandate to upload Form 17C on websites or provide it to anyone other than candidates or agents, citing risks of misuse and mistrust.

23 May, 2024 11:28 AM
national-security-always-paramount-sc-cancels-bail-of-pfi-members
Trending Judiciary
'National security always paramount,' SC cancels bail of PFI members [Read Judgment]

SC emphasizes national security, cancels bail of eight PFI members, stressing balance between civil liberties and counter-terrorism under UAPA.

23 May, 2024 12:05 PM
calcutta-hc-invalidates-five-lakh-obc-certificates-issued-after-2010-cites-unconstitutional-grounds
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Invalidates Five Lakh OBC Certificates Issued After 2010, Cites Unconstitutional Grounds [Read Judgment]

Calcutta High Court invalidates OBC certificates issued after 2010, declaring them unconstitutional. Court cites undue haste and procedural impropriety.

23 May, 2024 03:33 PM
mp-high-court-grants-police-protection-to-couple-facing-honour-killing-threats-over-marriage
Trending Judiciary
MP High Court Grants Police Protection to Couple Facing Honour Killing Threats over Marriage [Read Order]

MP High Court grants police protection to a couple facing death threats from their parents for marrying without consent, citing serious measures against honor killings.

23 May, 2024 03:45 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email