38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, December 03, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Medical Termination Of Pregnancy Act Amendment Comes Into Force; Changes Upper Limit Of Termination Of Pregnancy To 24 Weeks

By ANUSHKA BHATNAGAR      28 September, 2021 02:46 PM      0 Comments
Medical Termination Of Pregnancy Act Amendment Comes Into Force;  Changes Upper Limit Of Termination Of Pregnancy To 24 Weeks

On 24th September 2021, the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021 came into force with effect. The Bill of the Amendment was passed on 16th March 2021. The Act amends Section 3 of the Act increasing the time for the medical termination of pregnancy from 20 weeks to 24 weeks for certain categories of women which are defined under the Act. 

STATEMENT OF OBJECTS

The reasons embodied with the act for the amendment are that since medical technology has advanced drastically it is possible to increase the gestational limit especially for vulnerable women such as rape victims or women with prominent foetal anomalies which might be detected late in pregnancy. 

Another reason was that there is a need for providing women with legal and safe abortions so that unsafe abortions could be prevented in order to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity.

IMPORTANT AMENDMENTS

Section 3 of the Act elaborates that when can medical pregnancies be terminated by registered medical practitioners. 

Section 4 emphasizes the ground rules regarding the termination of pregnancy, the Section provides the conditions which need to be fulfilled for the pregnancy to be terminated legally, which are as follows -

  1. A hospital established or maintained by the Government 
  2. A place approved by the Government for the time being to comply by the purpose of this act. 

Under this section, there are other conditions such as the medical practitioner can terminate the pregnancy only if -

  1. The length of the pregnancy has not crossed the limitation period of 20 weeks
  2. The length of pregnancy has crossed 20 weeks but has not exceeded 24 weeks, for the women as prescribed by the Act can be allowed to terminate the pregnancy. 

However, in this case, two registered medical practitioners looking into the case should be of the opinion that if the pregnancy continues it would be gravely dangerous for the life of the pregnant woman or cause grave injury to her mental or physical health, OR if the life of the child is at substantial risks, such as it would suffer from any physical or mental abnormality. 

EXPLANATION

Clause (A) suggests that if the pregnancy occurs despite the woman or her partner using a method or any device to limit the number of children or to avoid the pregnancy, the problem that the woman faces due to such a pregnancy falls under the criterion of grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman. 

The explanation for the purpose of both the clauses is that if the pregnancy is caused by rape, the pregnancy shall be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman. 

MEDICAL OPINION 

The Act states that the opinion of one doctor is necessary for the termination of pregnancy up to 20 weeks, while for the termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks, it is necessary that the opinion of two doctors is necessary. 

Furthermore, the doctors should be of the opinion that continuance of the pregnancy would be dangerous for the pregnant woman or if the childs health is at substantial risk. 

MEDICAL BOARD

The Medical Board according to the Court is supposed to constitute a gynaecologist, a paediatrician, a radiologist or sonologist and other members as described by the rules of the State Government. The functions of each of these are described in detail in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy act. 

CONFIDENTIALITY OF IDENTITY 

As per the act, the details of the woman such as her name and other personal identifications shall not be revealed unless the person asking is in the position of authority to know the same as established by the law. 

PENALTY

The penalty for any person who acts in contravention of the act shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend up to one year or with a fine or both. 
 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

allahabad-hc-condemns-police-for-taking-woman-into-possession-despite-stay-orders-immediate-release
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Condemns Police for Taking Woman Into ‘Possession’ Despite Stay; Orders Immediate Release [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court slammed Muzaffarnagar Police for violating a stay order, declaring the detenue a major and ordering her immediate release.

02 December, 2025 09:27 PM
rera-orders-cannot-be-executed-through-civil-court-execution-petitions-karnataka-hc
Trending Judiciary
RERA Orders Cannot Be Executed Through Civil Court Execution Petitions: Karnataka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court rules RERA orders cannot be executed through civil courts, holding that such orders are not decrees under the CPC.

02 December, 2025 10:19 PM

TOP STORIES

forklifts-and-cranes-used-inside-factory-are-motor-vehicles-registration-and-tax-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Forklifts And Cranes Used Inside Factory Are ‘Motor Vehicles’; Registration & Tax Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that forklifts and cranes used inside factories are ‘motor vehicles’, requiring mandatory registration and tax under motor vehicle laws.

27 November, 2025 10:29 AM
loading-of-mineral-constitutes-transportation-us-21-4-of-the-mmdra-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Loading of Mineral Constitutes ‘Transportation’ U/S 21(4) Of The MMDRA: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC rules that loading minerals into a vehicle amounts to transportation under Section 21(4) of the MMDRA, upholding seizure for illegal mineral movement.

27 November, 2025 10:43 AM
sc-upholds-himachal-pradeshs-cancellation-of-tender-loi-sets-aside-high-court-order
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Himachal Pradesh’s Cancellation of Tender LoI, Sets Aside High Court Order [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds Himachal Pradesh’s cancellation of a PDS tender LoI, ruling it created no enforceable rights and overturning the High Court order.

27 November, 2025 10:57 AM
chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-pg-medical-admission-rules-for-violating-article-14-rejects-institutional-domicile-preference-upholds-merit
Trending Judiciary
Chhattisgarh HC Quashes PG Medical Admission Rules for Violating Article 14, Rejects Institutional/Domicile Preference, Upholds Merit [Read Order]

Chhattisgarh High Court quashes PG medical admission rules, holding institutional and domicile-based preferences unconstitutional and affirming merit.

27 November, 2025 11:16 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email