38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, July 18, 2024

National Security Act Applied in Delhi For Three Months

By LawStreet News Network      18 January, 2020 02:01 PM      1 Comments
National Security Act Applied in Delhi For Three Months

In the wave of protests against the new Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 and the National Register of Citizens or NRC, the infamous National Security Act, 1980 or (NSA) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) had been applied in Delhi for a period of three months. The Lieutenant Governor of Delhi notified the order on January 13, 2020 as a routine order which is issued every quarter. The order was passed giving power to the Commissioner of Police to detain any person under the NSA for a period of three months i.e. between 19 January and 18 April, 2020. 

The Act gives power to the police to arrest anyone without mentioning the grounds of arrest. A person can be detained without telling the grounds for 10 days and can be kept in prison for maximum 12 months without any charges. No rights under Article 22 (1) of the Constitution of India, 1949 will be given to the arrestee under the NSA. This article says that the arrested person should be given the right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of his own choice.   If the authority finds it important, he can also be detained under preventive detention. The grounds for preventive detention include:

A. Acting in any manner prejudicial to the defence of India, the relations of India with foreign powers, or the security of India.

B. Regulating the continued presence of any foreigner in India or with a view to making arrangements for his expulsion from India.

C. Preventing them from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the State or from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order or from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community it is necessary so to do.

The rights of the detainee under preventive detention are covered under Articles 22 (4) 22 (7) of the Constitution. The article says that the detainee can appeal before the High Court advisory board against his arrest. The advisory board can dismiss the case but if the advisory board finds it important for national peace and security to increase the term of detention, it can also increase the period of detention from 3 months to any number of months. 

A Senior Police Office in Delhi said that There is nothing new in this. Such an order is issued once in every three months that gives power to the police chief to detain under the NSA. The same act was applied in Andhra Pradesh on 14th January.

Author: Aditi Dubey

Share this article:

User Avatar

John Doe
Sanjeev Jan 19, 2020

Bahut badhiyaa

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Know The Law
Zero FIR: Here’s all you need to know!

Understanding Zero FIR: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 154 allows FIR at any police station. E-FIR under Section 173 ensures efficient crime reporting in India.

17 July, 2024 01:25 PM
Trending Judiciary
Judicial activist Ashwini Upadhyay asks SC to declare amendment to Preamble as unconstitutional

Judicial activist Ashwini Upadhyay petitions SC to declare the 42nd Amendment to the Preamble, which added "Socialist," "Secular," and "Integrity," as unconstitutional.

17 July, 2024 05:14 PM


Trending Judiciary
Bombay High Court denies interim relief in plea against 1 year Pan Masala Ban [Read Order]

Bombay High Court denies interim relief to petitioners challenging the 1-year ban on pan masala, citing arguable questions and ongoing similar cases.

12 July, 2024 10:00 AM
Trending Judiciary
SC Collegium recommends appointment of Chief Justices of eight High Courts [Read Order]

SC Collegium recommends appointments of Chief Justices for Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, J&K, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Madras, and Meghalaya High Courts.

12 July, 2024 10:55 AM
Trending Judiciary
SC orders interim bail for Kejriwal in ED case, refers issues on arrest to larger bench

SC grants interim bail to Kejriwal in ED case, refers arrest issues to larger bench; AAP leader remains in jail due to separate CBI arrest in liquor scam.

12 July, 2024 11:21 AM
Trending Judiciary
Hathras incident: SC refuses to consider PIL on inquiry, adequate compensation

Supreme Court declines PIL on Hathras stampede inquiry and compensation, directs petitioner to approach High Court for addressing the issue.

12 July, 2024 01:38 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email