38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 31, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

'Neither legal nor got religious sanction,' Centre defends law against triple talaq in SC

By Jhanak Sharma      20 August, 2024 11:20 AM      0 Comments
Neither legal nor got religious sanction Centre defends law against triple talaq in SC

NEW DELHI: The Union government has told the Supreme Court that the practice of triple talaq among Muslims was neither legal nor has got religious sanction for it allowed instantaneous voiding of the martial tie, and legitimised abandonment of the wives.

It said Parliament in its wisdom passed the 2019 law as despite the Supreme Court declaring the practice as unconstitutional and NGO All India Muslim Personal Law Board assuring the court of no such incidents in future, the practice had continued unabated among a sections of Muslim, in violation of the fundamental rights of the women.

"The practice of Tala-e-Biddat (instant pronouncement of triple talaq) did not simply result in a private injury but in a public wrong as it militated against the rights of women and the social institution of marriage itself," the Centre said.

In an affidavit, the Ministry of Law and Justice said the Constitution bench in 2017 Shayara Bano case by majority of 3:2 itself has held the practice of triple talaq as unconstitutional, it cannot be argued that a law criminalising the practice is manifestly arbitrary.

"The Shayara Bano case already recognised triple talaq as an aberrant practice. All that the impugned law does is provide for sanctions to enforce deterrence against following of the practice. This can by no means be called arbitrary and is in fact the very essence of criminal law," it said.

Also Read: Law against triple talaq necessary for gender justice and equality of married Muslim women, Centre tells  Supreme Court

The affidavit was filed in a writ petition by Samastha Kerala Jamiathul Ulema questioning the validity of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, which made the practice as punishable offence upto three years of jail term.

It said there is no basis to the claim that marriages being under personal law, they are exempt from the application of general criminal laws.

"Marriages are a social institution which the State has a special interest in protecting. It is beyond doubt that the State can protect the stability of marriages by resort to the of criminal law. Enactments such as the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 etc are all enacted under the same general principle as the present law i.e. preserving the sanctity of the institution of marriage," it said.

The affidavit also rejected a contention that since the criminal conduct engaged in had no advantageous legal effect for the perpetrator, it cannot be a crime.

"This argument turns the principle of penal laws on their head. In plain terms, petitioners are essentially attempting to argue that the Act ought not to be criminalised because the attempted illegal conduct was not successful in its object. In doing so, petitioners have overlooked the very basis of criminal law. If sanctions did not exist, the prohibition on criminal conduct itself would become a dead letter to be freely disregarded," it said.

The government also said defining offences and prescribing appropriate penalties is a core function of the State.

"Whether or not a particular type of conduct ought to be criminalised, and what punishment is to be imposed for such conduct is to be determined by the legislature in light of the prevailing social circumstances. Whether a particular type of conduct warrants treatment as a civil wrong or a criminal offence is a determination which cannot be made by the courts," it said.

The government also said it is also settled law that the petitioner cannot seek the enforcement of negative equality by contrasting the punishment provided for under one law for wrongful action with others.

"As held in a plethora of cases, Article 14 cannot be used as a tool to enforce negative equality. The practice of Tala- e-Biddat was held unconstitutional and a need was felt to have a standalone legislation to address the same. Therefore, the contentions of the petitioners that the present case ought to be equated with other forms of non-compliance and statutory violations in the process of divorce must be set aside at the outset, as this seeks the perpetuation of illegality which is not covered under Article 14," it said.
 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-hints-at-pan-india-guidelines-on-timeline-to-frame-charges
Trending Judiciary
SC hints at pan-India guidelines on timeline to frame charges

SC mulls pan-India guidelines to curb delays in framing charges; notes cases where charges aren’t framed even after years despite BNSS mandate of 60 days.

30 October, 2025 12:22 PM
limitation-for-continuous-breach-runs-only-till-contract-expiry-kerala-hc-clarifies
Trending Judiciary
Limitation for Continuous Breach Runs Only Till Contract Expiry: Kerala High Court Clarifies [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC clarifies that for continuous breach of contract, limitation under Article 55 starts when breach ceases; once contract ends, breach cannot continue.

30 October, 2025 01:37 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-quashes-uapa-arrests-holds-remand-courts-explanation-cannot-replace-written-grounds-of-arrest
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes UAPA Arrests, Holds Remand Court’s Explanation Cannot Replace Written Grounds Of Arrest [Read Order]

Supreme Court quashes UAPA arrests, ruling that remand court’s explanation cannot substitute the mandatory written grounds of arrest.

25 October, 2025 11:10 AM
ngt-orders-probe-into-illegal-tree-felling-in-delhis-civil-lines-directs-action-within-three-months
Trending Environment
NGT Orders Probe into Illegal Tree Felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines, Directs Action Within Three Months [Read Order]

NGT directs Tree Officer to probe illegal tree felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines and take action under the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act, 1994.

25 October, 2025 11:28 AM
gauhati-hc-quashes-fir-against-cnn-news18-anchor-akansha-swarup-over-kamakhya-temple-remarks
Trending CelebStreet
Gauhati HC Quashes FIR Against CNN-News18 Anchor Akansha Swarup Over Kamakhya Temple Remarks [Read Order]

Gauhati HC quashes FIR against CNN-News18 anchor Akansha Swarup, ruling her Kamakhya Temple remarks were careless but lacked malicious intent.

25 October, 2025 11:43 AM
delhi-hc-upholds-divorce-on-cruelty-grounds-denies-alimony-to-financially-independent-wife
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Divorce On Cruelty Grounds, Denies Alimony To Financially Independent Wife [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC upholds divorce on cruelty grounds, denies alimony to IRTS officer wife, ruling that alimony is for need-based justice, not enrichment.

25 October, 2025 12:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email