38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Number of Constitution bench matters reduced drastically over decades, Lok Sabha informed [Read Statement]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      01 August, 2023 06:40 PM      0 Comments
Number of Constitution bench matters reduced drastically over decades, Lok Sabha informed

NEW DELHI: Lok Sabha was informed on Friday that the number of Constitution bench matters disposed of by the Supreme Court since 1950 has come down drastically from 440 and 956 such cases between 1950-59, and 1960-69 respectively to just 71 cases between 2010-19. 

From 2020-23, 19 Constitution bench cases have been decided by the Supreme Court. At present, there are 29 Constitution bench cases pending for adjudication, Union Minister of State for Law and Justice Arjun Ram Meghwal said.

A Supreme Court bench with a strength of minimum five judges is called as Constitution bench, which is set up upon a reference when a significant question of law arises, necessitating interpretation of a provision or provision of the Constitution.

According to Article 145(3) of the Constitution, a minimum of five judges need to assemble for deciding a case involving a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution, or for hearing any reference under Article 143, which deals with the power of the President to consult the SC.

Sharing details of the Constitution bench matters decided by the Supreme Court, the government said between 1970-79, as many as 292 cases, between 1980-89, 110 cases, between 1990-99, 157 cases, between 2000-09, 138 cases, and between 2010-19, 71 cases were disposed of.

Out of 29 pending Constitution bench cases at present, 18 cases are pending before five-Judge bench, six cases before seven-Judge bench and five cases before nine-Judge bench for adjudication.

Replying to a query, the Minister said the adjudication and expeditious disposal of cases is within the exclusive domain of the judiciary and government has no role in the matter. It is not possible to set out strict parameters and timelines regarding adjudication of such cases, he said.

"It cannot be said that the reason for pendency of the Constitution bench cases is the lack of interest in expediting the same. In respect of the Constitution bench cases, there are intricate issues of law involved and arguments are addressed for number of days ranging from weeks to months. The said issues require deep analysis and thorough examination of law," he said.

The SC started functioning in 1950 with the strength of eight judges, which has now been raised to 34.

Having recorded arrears of cases, Parliament increased the number of judges in the Supreme Court from eight in 1950 to 11 in 1956, 14 in 1960, 18 in 1978, 26 in 1986, 31 in 2009 and 34 in 2019.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

kerala-government-initiates-legal-inquiry-into-rss-anthem-controversy-at-vande-bharat-flag-off
Trending Executive
Kerala Government Initiates Legal Inquiry into RSS Anthem Controversy at Vande Bharat Flag-Off

Kerala govt orders probe into students singing alleged RSS anthem at Vande Bharat flag-off, citing possible violation of education laws.

11 November, 2025 10:39 AM
india-nasa-solar-mission-marks-historic-first-in-visible-light-cme-observation-backed-by-international-space-law-framework
Trending International
India–NASA Solar Mission Marks Historic First in Visible-Light CME Observation, Backed by International Space Law Framework

India–NASA’s Aditya-L1 mission records first visible-light CME observation, marking a milestone in solar research and global space-law cooperation.

11 November, 2025 11:00 AM

TOP STORIES

injunction-suit-without-declaration-of-title-not-maintainable-when-possession-lies-with-defendant-sc
Trending Judiciary
Injunction Suit Without Declaration Of Title Not Maintainable When Possession Lies With Defendant: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that an injunction suit without a declaration of title is not maintainable when possession rests with the defendant.

06 November, 2025 03:25 PM
when-multiple-documents-on-same-property-are-challenged-court-fee-payable-only-on-principal-relief-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
When Multiple Documents On Same Property Are Challenged, Court Fee Payable Only On Principal Relief: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that when multiple documents on the same property are challenged, court fee is payable only on the principal relief.

06 November, 2025 03:40 PM
delay-in-filing-form-10b-cannot-deprive-trusts-of-tax-exemption-procedure-must-serve-justice-not-defeat-it-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Delay in filing Form 10B cannot deprive trusts of tax exemption; procedure must serve justice, not defeat it: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court held that delay in filing Form 10B cannot deny trusts tax exemption, stressing that procedure should aid justice, not obstruct it.

06 November, 2025 04:13 PM
courts-must-ensure-their-jurisdiction-is-not-snatched-away-in-child-custody-disputes-involving-foreign-nationals-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Courts must ensure their jurisdiction is not “snatched away” in child custody disputes involving foreign nationals: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC held that courts must ensure their jurisdiction isn’t “snatched away” in child custody disputes involving foreign nationals likely to flee the country.

06 November, 2025 04:27 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email