38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 23, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Number of Constitution bench matters reduced drastically over decades, Lok Sabha informed [Read Statement]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      01 August, 2023 06:40 PM      0 Comments
Number of Constitution bench matters reduced drastically over decades, Lok Sabha informed

NEW DELHI: Lok Sabha was informed on Friday that the number of Constitution bench matters disposed of by the Supreme Court since 1950 has come down drastically from 440 and 956 such cases between 1950-59, and 1960-69 respectively to just 71 cases between 2010-19. 

From 2020-23, 19 Constitution bench cases have been decided by the Supreme Court. At present, there are 29 Constitution bench cases pending for adjudication, Union Minister of State for Law and Justice Arjun Ram Meghwal said.

A Supreme Court bench with a strength of minimum five judges is called as Constitution bench, which is set up upon a reference when a significant question of law arises, necessitating interpretation of a provision or provision of the Constitution.

According to Article 145(3) of the Constitution, a minimum of five judges need to assemble for deciding a case involving a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution, or for hearing any reference under Article 143, which deals with the power of the President to consult the SC.

Sharing details of the Constitution bench matters decided by the Supreme Court, the government said between 1970-79, as many as 292 cases, between 1980-89, 110 cases, between 1990-99, 157 cases, between 2000-09, 138 cases, and between 2010-19, 71 cases were disposed of.

Out of 29 pending Constitution bench cases at present, 18 cases are pending before five-Judge bench, six cases before seven-Judge bench and five cases before nine-Judge bench for adjudication.

Replying to a query, the Minister said the adjudication and expeditious disposal of cases is within the exclusive domain of the judiciary and government has no role in the matter. It is not possible to set out strict parameters and timelines regarding adjudication of such cases, he said.

"It cannot be said that the reason for pendency of the Constitution bench cases is the lack of interest in expediting the same. In respect of the Constitution bench cases, there are intricate issues of law involved and arguments are addressed for number of days ranging from weeks to months. The said issues require deep analysis and thorough examination of law," he said.

The SC started functioning in 1950 with the strength of eight judges, which has now been raised to 34.

Having recorded arrears of cases, Parliament increased the number of judges in the Supreme Court from eight in 1950 to 11 in 1956, 14 in 1960, 18 in 1978, 26 in 1986, 31 in 2009 and 34 in 2019.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

madras-hc-calls-for-audit-of-fees-paid-to-law-officers-criticises-exorbitant-payments-and-unnecessary-appearances-by-additional-advocate-generals
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Calls for Audit of Fees Paid to Law Officers; Criticises Exorbitant Payments and Unnecessary Appearances by Additional Advocate Generals [Read Order]

Madras High Court calls for audit of fees paid to law officers, flags exorbitant payments and unnecessary appearances by Additional Advocate Generals.

22 December, 2025 08:56 PM
child-born-within-four-months-of-marriage-entitled-to-inheritance-sec-112-of-evidence-act-raises-conclusive-presumption-of-legitimacy-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Born Within Four Months Of Marriage Entitled To Inheritance; Sec 112 of Evidence Act Raises Conclusive Presumption of Legitimacy: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a child born within four months of marriage is legitimate and entitled to inheritance under Section 112 of the Evidence Act.

22 December, 2025 09:07 PM

TOP STORIES

madras-hc-invokes-ancient-rajadharma-and-kautilyas-arthashastra-govt-has-constitutional-duty-to-provide-legal-aid-to-indian-citizens-abroad
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Invokes Ancient ‘Rajadharma’ and Kautilya’s Arthashastra: Govt Has Constitutional Duty to Provide Legal Aid to Indian Citizens Abroad [Read Order]

Madras High Court invokes Rajadharma and Arthashastra, holds India has a constitutional duty to provide legal aid to citizens facing disputes abroad.

17 December, 2025 06:25 PM
sc-flags-exploitation-of-deity-criticises-paid-special-pujas-at-bankey-bihari-temple
Trending Judiciary
SC Flags ‘Exploitation’ of Deity, Criticises Paid ‘Special Pujas’ at Bankey Bihari Temple

Supreme Court flags exploitation of deity, questions paid special pujas at Bankey Bihari Temple, citing inequality and violation of sacred resting hours.

17 December, 2025 06:36 PM
can-courts-convict-an-accused-when-the-rape-victim-turns-hostile-supreme-court-says-no
Trending Judiciary
Can Courts Convict an Accused When the Rape Victim Turns Hostile? Supreme Court Says ‘No’ [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court acquits rape accused, holding courts cannot presume a victim was “won over” if she turns hostile; FIR alone cannot sustain conviction.

17 December, 2025 08:08 PM
delhi-court-dismisses-eds-pmla-complaint-against-sonia-gandhi-rahul-gandhi-in-national-herald-case-holds-fir-for-scheduled-offence-mandatory
Trending Executive
Delhi Court Dismisses ED’s PMLA Complaint Against Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi in National Herald Case; Holds FIR For Scheduled Offence Mandatory [Read Order]

Delhi court dismisses ED’s PMLA complaint in National Herald case, holding FIR for scheduled offence mandatory before prosecution.

17 December, 2025 08:16 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email