38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Prime Minister's National Relief Fund (PMNRF) Not A 'Public Authority' Under RTI Act, 2005: PMO

By ROCKY DAS      24 October, 2020 09:39 PM      0 Comments
Prime Minister's National Relief Fund (PMNRF) Not A 'Public Authority' Under RTI Act, 2005: PMO

The Prime Ministers National Relief Fund (PMNRF) was firstly instituted in 1948 with an appeal made by the then Prime Minister Late Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru for public contributions to assist help towards the displaced persons from Pakistan. Later on, the fund was being utilized to help and support the people affected by natural calamities like flood, cyclone. Earthquake etc. The fund was also being in use for the people killed or injured in major road accidents or communal riots.

Mr. Abhimanyu Srivastav has filed a petition regarding integrating the PMNRF into the RTI act, 2005. Mr. Srivastav has challenged in his petition to sought information related to the trustees of the PMNRF, documents related to the constitution of PMNRF. He has also further wanted the information regarding any of the opposition members who are or were being a part of the trustees in the PMNRF. 

An application has been filed by Retd. Commodore Lokesh Batra for seeking information about PMNRF through RTI. Deputy Secretary and appellate authority Amrik Singh observed that the RTI seeking information on PMNRF was filed on April 21. After he had examined the records, Singh noted that even after a considerable time, the final response has not been provided. The PMO is directed to provide the final response (on PMNRF) to the applicant within 25 working days from the date of issue of this letter, said Singh. 

Batra had sought a list of files that have details on the creation of PMNRF. He wanted files that have information on the conception, discussion and processes followed to date in PMNRF. He had requested for certified copies of complete files including noting where PMNRF was declared a Trust by the Income Tax Department and thereafter tax rebate was allowed (possibly in 1973).

In his RTI, Batra also asked for procedures and processes followed for the selection of the Chartered Accountant from time to time for conducting the audit. He wanted to know the years in which the audit was conducted and details of those who conducted the audit. Batra wanted documents, including notes, wherein the mid-eighties, the managing committee of PMNRF entrusted the entire management of PMNRF to the Prime Minister.

A single bench of the Delhi High Court noted that PMNRF was amenable in the RTI act, 2005. The order came to the reference to the plea filed by Aseem Takyar in 2011 while his petition has been rejected the Prime Ministers Office (PMO) stating that any information related to the PMNRF cannot be disclosed to the public in general and has not to be included in the RTI act, 2005. The verdict came into a split of judgments where Retired Justice Sunil Gaur observed that the PMNRF was not a public authority but Justice S Ravindra Bhat believed that it should be considered as a public authority and should be included in the RTI act, 2005.

Previously where the PMO has refused the PILs seeking information about the fund and clearly stated that it is not a Public authority at all now clarified that the PMNRF is not a public authority under the Section of 2(h) of the RTI act, 2005 and hence no one should seek or file any application to seek any information regarding such. Without revealing the information sought, the PMO disposed of the application stating: 

"Prime Minister's National Relief Fund (PMNRF) is not a public authority under the ambit of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, 2005. However, relevant information in respect of PMNRF may be seen on the website pmnrf.gov.in"



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-upholds-joint-insolvency-proceedings-against-interlinked-real-estate-companies
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Joint Insolvency Proceedings Against Interlinked Real Estate Companies [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds joint insolvency proceedings against interlinked real estate companies, allowing a single IBC petition for linked projects.

04 February, 2026 11:38 AM
sc-holds-courts-can-extend-arbitrators-mandate-even-after-award-is-rendered-clarifies-scope-of-section-29a-of-arbitration-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Courts Can Extend Arbitrator’s Mandate Even After Award Is Rendered, Clarifies Scope of Section 29A of Arbitration Act

Supreme Court rules courts can extend arbitrator’s mandate even after award, clarifying Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

04 February, 2026 12:53 PM
if-you-cant-follow-our-constitution-leave-india-supreme-court-to-meta-whatsapp-on-privacy-policy
Trending Judiciary
If You Can’t Follow Our Constitution, Leave India: Supreme Court to Meta, WhatsApp on Privacy Policy

Supreme Court warns Meta and WhatsApp to follow India’s Constitution or leave, slams privacy policy and data sharing with Meta companies.

04 February, 2026 01:30 PM
sc-to-rule-on-trump-era-emergency-tariffs-as-broader-us-tariff-landscape-shifts
Trending Judiciary
SC to Rule on Trump-Era Emergency Tariffs as Broader U.S. Tariff Landscape Shifts

Supreme Court to review Trump-era emergency tariffs under IEEPA, a ruling that could reshape U.S. trade policy and impact global markets and importers.

04 February, 2026 01:37 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email