38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, March 07, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Prime Minister's National Relief Fund (PMNRF) Not A 'Public Authority' Under RTI Act, 2005: PMO

By ROCKY DAS      24 October, 2020 09:39 PM      0 Comments
Prime Minister's National Relief Fund (PMNRF) Not A 'Public Authority' Under RTI Act, 2005: PMO

The Prime Ministers National Relief Fund (PMNRF) was firstly instituted in 1948 with an appeal made by the then Prime Minister Late Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru for public contributions to assist help towards the displaced persons from Pakistan. Later on, the fund was being utilized to help and support the people affected by natural calamities like flood, cyclone. Earthquake etc. The fund was also being in use for the people killed or injured in major road accidents or communal riots.

Mr. Abhimanyu Srivastav has filed a petition regarding integrating the PMNRF into the RTI act, 2005. Mr. Srivastav has challenged in his petition to sought information related to the trustees of the PMNRF, documents related to the constitution of PMNRF. He has also further wanted the information regarding any of the opposition members who are or were being a part of the trustees in the PMNRF. 

An application has been filed by Retd. Commodore Lokesh Batra for seeking information about PMNRF through RTI. Deputy Secretary and appellate authority Amrik Singh observed that the RTI seeking information on PMNRF was filed on April 21. After he had examined the records, Singh noted that even after a considerable time, the final response has not been provided. The PMO is directed to provide the final response (on PMNRF) to the applicant within 25 working days from the date of issue of this letter, said Singh. 

Batra had sought a list of files that have details on the creation of PMNRF. He wanted files that have information on the conception, discussion and processes followed to date in PMNRF. He had requested for certified copies of complete files including noting where PMNRF was declared a Trust by the Income Tax Department and thereafter tax rebate was allowed (possibly in 1973).

In his RTI, Batra also asked for procedures and processes followed for the selection of the Chartered Accountant from time to time for conducting the audit. He wanted to know the years in which the audit was conducted and details of those who conducted the audit. Batra wanted documents, including notes, wherein the mid-eighties, the managing committee of PMNRF entrusted the entire management of PMNRF to the Prime Minister.

A single bench of the Delhi High Court noted that PMNRF was amenable in the RTI act, 2005. The order came to the reference to the plea filed by Aseem Takyar in 2011 while his petition has been rejected the Prime Ministers Office (PMO) stating that any information related to the PMNRF cannot be disclosed to the public in general and has not to be included in the RTI act, 2005. The verdict came into a split of judgments where Retired Justice Sunil Gaur observed that the PMNRF was not a public authority but Justice S Ravindra Bhat believed that it should be considered as a public authority and should be included in the RTI act, 2005.

Previously where the PMO has refused the PILs seeking information about the fund and clearly stated that it is not a Public authority at all now clarified that the PMNRF is not a public authority under the Section of 2(h) of the RTI act, 2005 and hence no one should seek or file any application to seek any information regarding such. Without revealing the information sought, the PMO disposed of the application stating: 

"Prime Minister's National Relief Fund (PMNRF) is not a public authority under the ambit of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, 2005. However, relevant information in respect of PMNRF may be seen on the website pmnrf.gov.in"



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-invokes-article-139a-withdraws-three-decade-old-criminal-revision-petitions-from-allahabad-hc-to-itself
Trending Judiciary
SC Invokes Article 139A, Withdraws Three Decade-Old Criminal Revision Petitions From Allahabad HC To Itself [Read Order]

Supreme Court invokes Article 139A to transfer three decade-old criminal revision petitions from Allahabad High Court to itself, citing exceptional delay and public importance.

06 March, 2026 04:18 PM
deity-may-not-vote-but-constitution-speaks-madras-hc-finds-wilful-contempt-over-delay-in-recovering-507-acres-of-temple-land
Trending Judiciary
“Deity May Not Vote, But Constitution Speaks”: Madras HC Finds Wilful Contempt Over Delay in Recovering 507 Acres of Temple Land [Read Order]

Madras High Court finds wilful contempt by officials for failing to recover 507 acres of temple land, remarking that a deity may not vote but the Constitution must protect its rights.

06 March, 2026 04:38 PM

TOP STORIES

maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM
allegations-in-abetment-to-suicide-case-cannot-travel-beyond-contents-of-suicide-note-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Allegations in Abetment to Suicide Case Cannot Travel Beyond Contents of Suicide Note: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court quashes abetment to suicide case against 10 accused, holds complaint cannot go beyond contents of suicide note.

02 March, 2026 01:48 PM
epf-penalty-for-delayed-contribution-cannot-be-reduced-below-25-of-arrears-cgit-order-modified-karnataka-hc
Trending Judiciary
EPF Penalty for Delayed Contribution Cannot Be Reduced Below 25% of Arrears; CGIT Order Modified: Karnataka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court rules EPF penalty for delayed PF contributions cannot be reduced below 25% of arrears including interest; CGIT order modified.

02 March, 2026 01:57 PM
scwla-condemns-kanpur-bar-association-holi-event-seeks-disciplinary-action-and-gender-sensitisation-guidelines
Trending Legal Insiders
SCWLA Condemns Kanpur Bar Association Holi Event, Seeks Disciplinary Action & Gender Sensitisation Guidelines [Read Press Release]

SCWLA condemns Kanpur Bar Holi event, seeks apology, disciplinary action & gender sensitisation norms over alleged objectification of women.

02 March, 2026 03:23 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email