38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, February 21, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

SC Imposes Rs. 5 Lakhs Fine on Ministries Of Centre & State For Negligence In Implementation Of Social Kitchen & Food Security Act

By LawStreet News Network      10 February, 2020 01:02 PM      0 Comments
SC Imposes Rs. 5 Lakhs Fine on Ministries Of Centre & State For Negligence In Implementation Of Social Kitchen & Food Security Act

The Supreme Court on the 10th of February 2020 has imposed a fine of Rs. 5 lakhs on the Ministries of Centre and State. The Apex court is angered by the negligence that has been shown in the implementation of the Social Kitchen and Food Security Act 2013. The Ministries that have been fined include Ministry of Law and Justice, Women and Welfare, Social Justice and Empowerment, Rural Development for failing to file an affidavit with details for the steps that are taken for ensurance of food security and community kitchens for poor and homeless. 

A 24 hour period extension has been granted to the ministries for filling of an affidavit and if that is administered then the penalty will be laid taken of Rs. 4 lakhs. But the Rain. 1 lakh fine needs to be paid. And those who don't file the affidavits will pay Rs. 5 lakhs

The Hearing has been pending and delayed due to the delay and negligence incurred by the states for over five months. The court says it's unfortunate that the center/states have not responded. A total of only 7 states have filed affidavits on food security and community kitchens that are Punjab, Karnataka, Uttarakhand, Jharkhand, Nagaland, J&K and Andaman. There has been no reply from the Centre till date. 

The bench that is headed by Justice NV Ramana has laid down the 24 hour period condition. 

Bench headed by J. NV Ramana says if states file affidavit within 24 hours they pay Rs. 1 lakh as cost. 

The next hearing is scheduled on 17th February, 2020, Monday. 

Author - Dyuti Pandya 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

homoeopathy-practitioner-cannot-prescribe-allopathy-medicines-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Homoeopathy Practitioner Cannot Prescribe Allopathy Medicines: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Supreme Court holds homoeopathy practitioners cannot prescribe allopathy drugs; Telangana HC quashes FIR on procedural lapse under NMCA.

20 February, 2026 11:28 AM
contractual-bar-on-interest-claims-overrides-interest-act-kerala-high-court-order-set-aside-sc
Trending Judiciary
Contractual Bar on Interest Claims Overrides Interest Act; Kerala High Court Order Set Aside: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that contractual clauses barring interest claims override the Interest Act, setting aside Kerala High Court’s order on delayed payments.

20 February, 2026 11:43 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email