38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, April 13, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

SEBI penalizes individual for releasing price sensitive information: WhatsApp Leak Case

By Saumya Srivastava      17 June, 2020 04:20 PM      0 Comments
SEBI penalizes individual for releasing price sensitive information: WhatsApp Leak Case

On Monday (June 15, 2020), market regulator SEBI penalized an individual after he was found guilty of releasing unpublished price sensitive information related to financial results of Asian Paints through WhatsApp messages before the official announcement by the company.

A penalty of 15 lakh has been imposed on the said individual - Neeraj Kumar Agarwal.

A few news reports referred to the circulation of Unpublished Price Sensitive Information (UPSI) in various private WhatsApp groups about some companies before their official announcements to the respective stock exchanges.

Regarding this, SEBI had initiated a preliminary examination during which search and seizure operation against 26 entities of a WhatsApp group were conducted, and around 190 devices and records, among others, were seized.

The chats extracted from seized devices were examined further and it was found that earning data and other financial details of about 12 companies were leaked through WhatsApp.

Asian Paints was one of the firms whose quarterly financial reports closely matched with the messages in the WhatsApp chats. 

An investigation was carried out regarding the matter of circulation of UPSI through WhatsApp messages related to Asian Paints to ascertain any possible violation of the PIT (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations in March-May 2017.

In the probe conducted by SEBI, it was found that Agarwal communicated the UPSI related to total income, EBITDA, and profit after tax of Asian Paints for the quarter ending March 2017 through WhatsApp messages.

The financial figures of Asian Paints that were circulated through WhatsApp closely matched with those subsequently revealed to the exchanges by the company.

SEBI in its 36-page order said, The noticee (Agarwal), being an insider, had communicated the UPSI relating to Asian Paints Ltd, to another person through WhatsApp messages, which is in violation of the provisions of SEBI (PIT) Regulations, 2015, for which the noticee is liable for monetary penalty.

Any person having possession of UPSI is regarded as an insider, according to the PIT norms.

Shruti Vora, who had been working in the institutional team at Antique Stock Broking Ltd from September 2008, was also penalized by SEBI for releasing UPSI related to financial results of Asian Paints through WhatsApp messages.

Earlier, persons involved in communicating financial results of Bajaj Auto, Ambuja Cement, Wipro, and Mindtree through WhatsApp messages before their official announcements had also been penalized by the regulator.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-quashes-criminal-case-against-paediatric-surgeon-who-removed-undescended-testicle-of-one-and-a-half-year-old
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes Criminal Case Against Paediatric Surgeon Who Removed Undescended Testicle of One-and-a-Half-Year-Old [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes 20-year criminal case against paediatric surgeon, holds prosecution over orchidectomy was abuse of process.

07 April, 2026 02:01 PM
allahabad-hc-seeks-explanation-from-mact-officer-over-6-year-delay-in-motor-accident-compensation
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Seeks Explanation from MACT Officer Over 6-Year Delay in Motor Accident Compensation [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court seeks explanation from MACT officer for blocking widow’s motor accident compensation for over six years despite Lok Adalat order.

07 April, 2026 02:06 PM
calling-someone-bastard-in-the-heat-of-an-argument-is-not-an-obscene-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Someone ‘Bastard’ in the Heat of an Argument Is Not an Obscene Act: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules abusive words like “bastard” aren’t obscene under Section 294 IPC, quashes conviction, distinguishes vulgarity from obscenity.

07 April, 2026 02:10 PM
cheque-bounce-case-not-maintainable-if-part-payments-are-not-disclosed-or-endorsed-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cheque Bounce Case Not Maintainable if Part Payments Are Not Disclosed or Endorsed: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court upholds acquittal in cheque bounce case, ruling undisclosed part payments negate legally enforceable debt under Section 138 NI Act.

07 April, 2026 02:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email