38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, October 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Stakeholders Given More Time To Submit Feedback On Net Neutrality Rules By TRAI

By LawStreet News Network      01 February, 2020 01:02 PM      0 Comments
Stakeholders Given More Time To Submit Feedback On Net Neutrality Rules By TRAI

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has postponed the date for stakeholders for sending in suggestions on its consultation paper from January 30, 2020 to February 13, 2020. On January 2, 2020, TRAI released a consultation paper on issues related to traffic management practice which said that the Indian telecom sector is subjected to one of the highest taxes in the world. As per the latest numbers available with TRAI, the total number of telephone subscribers were 1,175.88 million at the end of November 2019. Further, India has a total of 665.31 million internet subscribers, out of which, wired internet subscribers are 21.6 million and wireless internet subscribers are 643.6 million. The latest paper released by TRAI suggests a mechanism for reasonable Internet traffic management to ensure that quality of service remains the same for all users while preserving the security of networks and providing for emergency services. The paper also says that there should be provisions to implement court orders and government directions, as long as they are transparent and their impact on users is declared. The paper focuses on Net Neutrality and says that Interent Service Providers (ISPs) do not have the power to discriminate against certain companies, types of content or users. For the uninitiated, net neutrality is the principle which says that the quality of service should be the same for all users, regardless of which services they access or which digital partners they have employed as their service providers. Net neutrality principles approved by the telecom department in 2018 prohibit service providers from discriminating against internet content and services by blocking, throttling or according preferential higher speeds.  The Net neutrality debate in India sparked off after Airtel in December 2014 announced a plan to charge for data consumed for making Internet based calls, at base rate.

The objective of this consultation paper is to deliberate the issues related to traffic management practices and the multi stakeholder body. It discusses about establishment of a framework to formulate traffic management practices. The paper also discusses about the issues related to "composition, function, Governance Structure of multi-stakeholder body," said TRAI. In 2018, Department of telecom (DoT) accepted TRAIs net neutrality recommendations released in the previous year when TRAI also sought stakeholder views on ways to detect net neutrality violations and more. TRAIhas extended the deadline for stakeholder comments and counter-comments on its discussion paper on net neutrality rules.

TRAI said that comments on issues raised in the consultation paper should have been submitted by January 30, 2020 and counter comments by February 13, 2020. The authority said that, "It is now seeking comments by February 13 instead of January 30, and counter-comments must be filed by February 27 instead of the earlier deadline of February 13, following requests from stakeholders."

Multi-Stakeholder Body will be responsible for providing support to Telecom Department in monitoring and enforcement of net neutrality principles and submit requisite reports to the Government based on monitoring and investigations. The TRAI paper has sought stakeholder views on ways to detect net neutrality violations, especially when methods such as crowdsourcing or sample field measurements could be deployed, or whether an audit of processes undertaken by telecoms for avoiding such violations are the way forward. 

Author - Dyuti Pandya 

 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-holds-mere-delay-in-suit-cant-legalise-infringement-in-ipr-disputes
Trending Judiciary
SC holds mere delay in suit can't legalise infringement in IPR disputes [Read Judgment]

SC: Delay in filing suit doesn’t legalise patent infringement; urgency must be judged by ongoing injury, not delay, to protect IPR and public interest.

28 October, 2025 02:08 PM
society-will-not-forgive-sc-on-denial-of-insurance-coverage-to-health-workers
Trending Judiciary
'Society will not forgive,' SC on denial of insurance coverage to health workers

SC says society will not forgive judiciary if it fails to protect doctors; reserves verdict on plea over denial of COVID-19 insurance to private health workers.

28 October, 2025 05:09 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-grants-interim-protection-to-kumar-sanus-personality-rights-restrains-unauthorised-use-of-voice-and-image
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Grants Interim Protection To Kumar Sanu’s Personality Rights, Restrains Unauthorised Use of Voice and Image [Read Order]

Delhi HC grants interim protection to Kumar Sanu, restraining unauthorized AI use of his voice, image, and likeness to safeguard personality rights.

24 October, 2025 11:04 AM
orissa-hc-restores-fathers-visitation-rights-says-child-entitled-to-love-and-affection-of-both-parents
Trending Judiciary
Orissa HC Restores Father’s Visitation Rights, Says Child Entitled To Love And Affection Of Both Parents [Read Order]

Orissa High Court restores biological father’s visitation rights, holding that every child is entitled to love and affection of both parents.

24 October, 2025 11:50 AM
centre-writes-to-cji-to-nominate-justice-surya-kant-as-successor
Trending Legal Insiders
Centre writes to CJI to nominate Justice Surya Kant as successor

Centre writes to CJI B R Gavai recommending Justice Surya Kant as the next Chief Justice of India; he is set to assume office on November 24, 2025.

24 October, 2025 07:53 PM
sc-quashes-uapa-arrests-holds-remand-courts-explanation-cannot-replace-written-grounds-of-arrest
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes UAPA Arrests, Holds Remand Court’s Explanation Cannot Replace Written Grounds Of Arrest [Read Order]

Supreme Court quashes UAPA arrests, ruling that remand court’s explanation cannot substitute the mandatory written grounds of arrest.

25 October, 2025 11:10 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email