38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, January 03, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Stakeholders Given More Time To Submit Feedback On Net Neutrality Rules By TRAI

By LawStreet News Network      01 February, 2020 01:02 PM      0 Comments
Stakeholders Given More Time To Submit Feedback On Net Neutrality Rules By TRAI

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has postponed the date for stakeholders for sending in suggestions on its consultation paper from January 30, 2020 to February 13, 2020. On January 2, 2020, TRAI released a consultation paper on issues related to traffic management practice which said that the Indian telecom sector is subjected to one of the highest taxes in the world. As per the latest numbers available with TRAI, the total number of telephone subscribers were 1,175.88 million at the end of November 2019. Further, India has a total of 665.31 million internet subscribers, out of which, wired internet subscribers are 21.6 million and wireless internet subscribers are 643.6 million. The latest paper released by TRAI suggests a mechanism for reasonable Internet traffic management to ensure that quality of service remains the same for all users while preserving the security of networks and providing for emergency services. The paper also says that there should be provisions to implement court orders and government directions, as long as they are transparent and their impact on users is declared. The paper focuses on Net Neutrality and says that Interent Service Providers (ISPs) do not have the power to discriminate against certain companies, types of content or users. For the uninitiated, net neutrality is the principle which says that the quality of service should be the same for all users, regardless of which services they access or which digital partners they have employed as their service providers. Net neutrality principles approved by the telecom department in 2018 prohibit service providers from discriminating against internet content and services by blocking, throttling or according preferential higher speeds.  The Net neutrality debate in India sparked off after Airtel in December 2014 announced a plan to charge for data consumed for making Internet based calls, at base rate.

The objective of this consultation paper is to deliberate the issues related to traffic management practices and the multi stakeholder body. It discusses about establishment of a framework to formulate traffic management practices. The paper also discusses about the issues related to "composition, function, Governance Structure of multi-stakeholder body," said TRAI. In 2018, Department of telecom (DoT) accepted TRAIs net neutrality recommendations released in the previous year when TRAI also sought stakeholder views on ways to detect net neutrality violations and more. TRAIhas extended the deadline for stakeholder comments and counter-comments on its discussion paper on net neutrality rules.

TRAI said that comments on issues raised in the consultation paper should have been submitted by January 30, 2020 and counter comments by February 13, 2020. The authority said that, "It is now seeking comments by February 13 instead of January 30, and counter-comments must be filed by February 27 instead of the earlier deadline of February 13, following requests from stakeholders."

Multi-Stakeholder Body will be responsible for providing support to Telecom Department in monitoring and enforcement of net neutrality principles and submit requisite reports to the Government based on monitoring and investigations. The TRAI paper has sought stakeholder views on ways to detect net neutrality violations, especially when methods such as crowdsourcing or sample field measurements could be deployed, or whether an audit of processes undertaken by telecoms for avoiding such violations are the way forward. 

Author - Dyuti Pandya 

 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

telangana-hc-cannot-seek-extension-beyond-45-day-limit-to-file-written-version-in-consumer-cases
Trending Judiciary
Telangana HC: Cannot Seek Extension Beyond 45-Day Limit to File Written Version in Consumer Cases [Read Order]

Telangana High Court rules written versions in consumer cases cannot be filed beyond the mandatory 45-day limit under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

02 January, 2026 07:13 PM
preventive-detention-cannot-be-used-to-silence-dissenting-voices-of-journalists-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Preventive Detention Cannot Be Used to Silence Dissenting Voices of Journalists: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court warns against misuse of preventive detention to silence journalists, calls it a threat to free speech and liberty.

02 January, 2026 08:04 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-earlier-aravalli-definition-judgment-lists-matter-before-vacation-bench-on-december-29
Trending Judiciary
SC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Earlier Aravalli Definition Judgment; Lists Matter Before Vacation Bench on December 29

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of Aravalli definition issue, lists matter before Vacation Bench on Dec 29, 2025, amid environmental concerns.

28 December, 2025 05:08 PM
bombay-hc-upholds-b-summary-report-dismissing-plea-to-reopen-sexual-assault-case-against-sajjan-jindal
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Upholds B-Summary Report, Dismissing Plea to Reopen Sexual Assault Case Against Sajjan Jindal [Read Order]

Bombay High Court upholds B-summary report, dismisses plea to reopen sexual assault FIR against Sajjan Jindal, citing delay, consent, and lack of merit.

29 December, 2025 05:04 PM
calcutta-hc-holds-scst-act-provisions-not-applicable-to-caste-based-abuses-hurled-over-telephone-holds-conversation-not-in-public-view
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Holds SC/ST Act Provisions Not Applicable To Caste-Based Abuses Hurled Over Telephone, Holds Conversation Not In Public View

Calcutta High Court rules SC/ST Act not applicable to caste-based abuses over telephone, holding such conversations are not in public view.

29 December, 2025 05:13 PM
bombay-hc-holds-padma-awards-cannot-be-used-as-prefix-or-suffix-to-awardees-names
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Holds Padma Awards Cannot Be Used as Prefix or Suffix to Awardees’ Names [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rules Padma awardees cannot use Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan or Bharat Ratna as prefixes or suffixes to their names under Article 18.

29 December, 2025 05:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email