38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Truth behind the rumors on the new Farm Laws in India

By Vivek Kumar      21 July, 2021 05:15 PM      0 Comments
Truth Farm Laws in India

Introduction:

On the morning of 17 September 2020, three Farm Laws were passed in the Lok Sabha, and the country has been in a big debate ever since. 

The argument over whether the farm laws will empower farmers or destroy the agriculture sector of India in ongoing since then. As the 8-month long dispute continues, lets take a look at some of these questions and the truth behind them. 

Are the Farm Laws Unconstitutional? 

One of the main arguments being presented against the new laws is that the farm laws are unconstitutional. It was said that the Agriculture sector comes under the State jurisdiction and Centre does not have a say in it. 

This is only partially true as agriculture falls under state jurisdiction, but agriculture produce is a trade commodity. The Concurrent list in the seventh Schedule of the Indian constitution gives Centre the power to make legislation regarding trade of commodities. 

Therefore, the new laws are completely constitutional. The strength in this argument can also be determined from the fact that no state government, even for the non-BJP states, has gone to the Supreme Court against the laws. 



Were the Farm Laws passed in a haste?

Another related criticism of the new farm laws is that they were passed in a haste, without the consultation of opposition parties and/or Farmer leaders. However, the truth is that the flaws in the APMCs (Mandis) were realized a long time ago. Ramesh Chanda, a member of NITI Aayog wrote in his paper:

the discussions on policy reforms and structural changes in agriculture started around the year 2000. It began with suggestions for changes in market regulation and removal of various restrictions provided under the APMC Act.

APMCs were created as a means to strengthen farmers, but they gradually became a tool to exploit them. Farmers have to pay commissions and taxes on sale of their produce. 

The traders at Mandis buy crops from farmers crops at a low price then sell it at a higher price to the consumer. The new laws allow farmers to trade directly with consumers without paying any taxes or commissions. They can sell their harvest outside the mandis and save the transportation costs. 

This law will create a liberal competitive market for farmers which will ensure greater prices for farmers than Mandis. 

Will the new law abolish Mandis and scrap MSP? 

There have been rumors that the new laws will abolish the Mandis and scrape the Minimum Support Price. The Farm law, however, does not mention the abolition of Mandis or the MSPs. It instead gives farmers a choice to either sell their crops at Mandis or outside. 

Why are the protests happening? 

Protests started soon after the bills were passed. Farm leaders described these laws as Black laws for Indian Agriculture. Government has been holding talks with the farmer leaders to negotiate and listen to any reforms that they may suggest. Farm leaders, however, are bent on the laws being taken back without any concrete argument. 

Conclusion:

Several rumors on the new farm laws continue to make way through the protestors. However, it may be pertinent to note that these are baseless and in reality the laws are meant to empower the farmers and bring about the betterment of all in the time to come.  The  way forward then is for all parties to recognize the the proposed legal arrangement for what it truly represents. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email