38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, February 21, 2024

The Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Files an Affidavit in the Supreme Court Suggesting Guidelines for Cost-Effective Treatment of Covid-19 Patients

By Shreedhara Purohit      Jul 27, 2020      0 Comments
The Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Files an Affidavit in the Supreme Court Suggesting Guidelines for Cost-Effective Treatment of Covid-19 Patients

The Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has filed an affidavit in the Apex Court proposing that the state governments may consider Ayushman Bharat-PMJAY or CGHS rates as the benchmark basic rates for treatment of coronavirus patients.

The Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) in the affidavit mentioned certain suggestions for cost-effective treatment of Covid-19 patients after convening a stakeholder meeting following the court's direction on July 14.

"States arrive at fair rates on priority basis to ensure there is no over-charging of COVID-19 patients or indiscriminate hike for patients…. States may consider Ayushman Bharat-PMJAY and/or CGHS rates as the benchmark basic rates. Certain states have already fixed rates for Covid-19 treatment in private hospitals", said the report. The cost ideally should be all-inclusive PPE, drugs (generic to the extent possible), consumables; investigations, procedures, treatment of co-morbidities, diagnostics, patient transportation, and referral, added the report.

In the report, the health ministry said that health is a state subject and the primary responsibility in terms of management of Covid-19 rests with the states. "States may consider exploring utilizing health facilities available in the private sector to augment the available public health infrastructure for Covid-19. Many states have fixed rates and communicated the same to private hospitals", said the health ministry.

A bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde on July 14 had said that "We, therefore, consider it iniquitous to impose a ceiling on the charges for treatment of Covid-19", and permitted the petitioners to make a representation to the Centre.

"The decision of the said meeting shall be placed before this court for further consideration of the matter before issuing directions/guidelines under the Disaster Management Act, to the various State Governments/Union Territories'', said the top court while hearing a PIL filed by Sachin Jain raising the issue that private hospitals, given land free of cost, should not charge heavily from Covid-19 patients.

The health ministry, proposing guiding principles for the states, said while the decision for utilizing the services of the private sector rests with the states, normative guidance may be provided to the states to facilitate them for arriving at reasonable rates for the private hospitals to undertake Covid-19 treatment.

"The costing may consider any/all of the below parameters: a. Categorization of hospitals (NABH/ non-NABH) b, Categorization of illness (Mild, Moderate, Severe) c. Category of beds (Isolation Bed without oxygen; Oxygen supplementation bed; ICU bed with non-invasive Ventilation, ICU bed with Ventilator, etc.) d. Tier wise categorization of cities (A, B, C) e. Categorization of hospitals (Tertiary care, Secondary care) or on basis of bed strength (250-50)", said the report.

The health ministry emphasized that the states should set up a mechanism where such fair rates are given wide publicity and where grievances regarding overcharging can be redressed and timelines fixed for their redressal.

The Supreme Court has thus asked the Centre to give a decision to the apex court within 7 days, for approval of directions to be issued under the National Disaster Management Act to various States.

Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this



Lawstreet Advertisement
Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email