38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 10, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

UP Government Passes Ordinance Prescribing Punishments for Covid-19 Crimes

By Shreya Srivastava      09 May, 2020 08:12 PM      0 Comments
UP Government Passes Ordinance Prescribing Punishments for Covid-19 Crimes

Uttar Pradesh Government on Wednesday i.e. 6th May 2020 passed an Ordinance that prescribes a maximum punishment of life term if COVID-19 death is caused by a person by intentional affliction.

Intentional Affliction here means that any person who infects another person with a contagious disease intentionally.

Section 24 of the UP-Public Health and Epidemic Disease Control Ordinance,2020 talks about the punishment for intentional affliction i.e. if any person who intentionally infects another person with a contagious disease shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for 2-5 years.

Section 25 talks about Mass Affliction, infecting five or more than five people.

Section 26 states that whoever causes death under Section 24 and Section 25 of the Ordinance, shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years but may extend to life imprisonment and be made liable to pay a fine of Rs. 3 Lakh to Rs. 5 lakhs.

The State Chief Secretary, R.K Tiwari clarify that the meaning of intentionally in the Ordinance is the same as defined in legal terms.

The Ordinance also provides punishment for concealment and travel by Public transport by a COVID-19 patient, which ranges from Rs. 50,000 to 1 Lakh and imprisonment for 1-3 years.

All the offenses under this Ordinance shall be Cognizable and non-bailable as per Section 30.

Further as per the Ordinance, Section 31(1) states that no suits or legal proceedings shall lie against any person for anything, which is done with good intention or in good faith.

The State Finance Minister, Suresh Khanna said that spitting, incitement to attack, throwing filth on Corona Warriors, violating quarantine norms will be met with punishment for 2-5 years and fine of Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 2 Lakhs.

There are also harsh punishments prescribed under the Ordinance for attacks on Healthcare workers.

For assault, misbehaving with health workers, paramedical staff, police personnel, sanitization workers, or any corona warriors deployed by the Government, the punishment will range from 6 Months to 7 Years, and fine from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 5 Lakhs.

For the violation of quarantine norms, the person can be imprisoned for 1-3 years and may be liable to pay Rs. 70,000 to Rs. 1 Lakh.

Those who escape from the hospitals can be imprisoned for 1-2 years and made to pay Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 1 Lakh.

The Government will set up two authorities for prevention and treatment of the disease i.e. the State Epidemic Control Authority will be chaired by the Chief Minister and the District Central Epidemic Control Authority which will be chaired by District Magistrate, under the proposed law.

If we talk about the UP, last month, Bollywood singer Kanika Kapoor was booked under Section 188, 269, and 270 of IPC, after she attended the gatherings in Lucknow, including a party where many political leaders were present and later, she tested positive for the COVOD-19 disease.

There are many other instances across the country where Section 269 and Section 270 IPC have been used to book persons who violate the quarantine order for containing the spread of the pandemic.

The UP Government issued the Ordinance to punish those who are seen flouting the lockdown norms and are preventing the government from effectively curbing the spread of the pandemic. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-allows-judicial-officers-with-7-years-experience-as-advocates-to-apply-for-district-judges
Trending Legal Insiders
SC allows judicial officers with 7 years experience as advocates to apply for district judges [Read Judgment]

SC allows judicial officers with 7 years’ Bar experience to apply for district judge posts; ruling ensures level playing field and directs states to frame eligibility rules.

09 October, 2025 11:07 AM
sc-sets-aside-conviction-death-sentence-awarded-to-man-in-sexual-assault-murder-of-7-yr-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
SC sets aside conviction, death sentence awarded to man in sexual assault, murder of 7-yr-old girl [Read Judgment]

SC acquits man on death row in 2017 Tamil Nadu case, citing prosecution’s failure and unfair trial; says courts can’t convict on moral grounds alone.

09 October, 2025 12:39 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email