38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 03, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

Ban on Chinese Apps in Violation of WTO Rules: China

By Harshil Jain      06 July, 2020 05:06 PM      0 Comments
Ban on Chinese Apps in Violation of WTO Rules: China

On Thursday 2 July 2020, China said it hopes that India would correct its discriminatory actions against Chinese companies. The statement came 3 days after India banned 59 mobile apps, most of which are Chinese or have links with Chinese data servers.

The Indian government banned the apps on Monday 29 June 2020, citing that they were prejudicial to the sovereignty and integrity of India, defense of India, the security of the state and public order. Though the government was mulling over the issue since early June, the decision came after violent clashes took place between the Indian Army and Peoples Liberation Army.

Reacting to the ban, the Chinese government, on Tuesday 30 June 2020, said that it was strongly concerned about the ban and such actions will prove to be against Indias interests.

Two days after the remarks made by the Chinese government, Chinese commerce ministry spokesperson Gao Feng said that Indias actions regarding the ban of Chinese apps violate the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. He also mentioned that no such action has been taken by the Chinese government against Indian goods and services.

In addition to this, a Chinese economist connected with a think tank in Beijing said, Hi-tech FDI from China legally flew into India, and was welcomed by the Indian government. But now, without going through any legal process or necessary warning, the Chinese FDI has been blocked overnight. He pointed out that the Indian decision violates WTO rules.

Clarifying about the impact of this ban on other foreign investments in India, the foreign ministry spokesperson Anurag Srivastava said, software and internet applications firms in India have to abide by the rules and regulations issued by the relevant ministries and departments, including those pertaining to data security and privacy of individual data.

India welcomes foreign investments and has one of the most open FDI regimes, but this will have to be in accordance with the rules and regulatory framework established by the government, he added.

A professor of economics in Jawaharlal Nehru University, Prof. Biswajit Dhar, said that China cannot sue India for banning these apps as it will lack sufficient and reasonable ground for instituting a case in WTO. He added, The apps are not likely to be protected by any forms of Intellectual Property Rights. Chinese firms could have claimed the apps as their assets, but we dont have an investment treaty with China and investments are not under WTOs purview. Had we joined RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership), which includes an investment agreement, things would have been different.

On Tuesday 30 June 2020, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian said, China is strongly concerned about the relevant notice issued by the Indian side. We are checking on and verifying the situation.

The Indian government has the responsibility to uphold the legitimate and legal rights of the international investors, including the Chinese ones, he added.

India accounted for roughly 30 percent of the total 611 million downloads of the Chinese app TikTok, reported the state-controlled China Daily. The ban will pose as a big stumbling block for Chinese internet entities, which are completely dependent on the number of users and online traffic on their platforms to gain a market position overseas, said Raymond Wang, partner at consultancy Ronald Berger.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM
allegations-in-abetment-to-suicide-case-cannot-travel-beyond-contents-of-suicide-note-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Allegations in Abetment to Suicide Case Cannot Travel Beyond Contents of Suicide Note: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court quashes abetment to suicide case against 10 accused, holds complaint cannot go beyond contents of suicide note.

02 March, 2026 01:48 PM

TOP STORIES

ncert-introduces-judicial-backlog-and-corruption-in-class-8-curriculum-highlights-47-crore-pending-cases-across-courts
Trending Judiciary
NCERT Introduces Judicial Backlog and Corruption in Class 8 Curriculum, Highlights 4.7 Crore Pending Cases Across Courts

NCERT updates Class 8 textbooks to address judicial backlog and corruption, citing 4.7 crore pending cases and accountability mechanisms in India’s courts.

25 February, 2026 11:12 AM
delhi-hc-grants-jubin-nautiyal-ex-parte-injunction-against-ai-platforms-e-commerce-sites-for-personality-rights-violations
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Grants Jubin Nautiyal Ex Parte Injunction Against AI Platforms, E-Commerce Sites for Personality Rights Violations [Read Order]

Delhi HC grants ex parte injunction to Jubin Nautiyal against AI platforms and e-commerce sites over unauthorised use of his voice, image and persona.

25 February, 2026 12:48 PM
voluntary-confessions-under-customs-act-are-valid-evidence-for-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Voluntary Confessions Under Customs Act Are Valid Evidence for Conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds voluntary confessions under Section 108 of the Customs Act are valid evidence to sustain conviction in smuggling cases.

25 February, 2026 12:54 PM
sc-rules-illegality-of-search-does-not-invalidate-evidence-seized
Trending Judiciary
SC Rules Illegality of Search Does Not Invalidate Evidence Seized [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds illegal search does not bar admissibility of seized evidence if relevant and legally admissible under law.

25 February, 2026 01:32 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email