38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 17, 2024

Ban on Chinese Apps in Violation of WTO Rules: China

By Harshil Jain      06 July, 2020 05:06 PM      0 Comments
Ban on Chinese Apps in Violation of WTO Rules: China

On Thursday 2 July 2020, China said it hopes that India would correct its “discriminatory” actions against Chinese companies. The statement came 3 days after India banned 59 mobile apps, most of which are Chinese or have links with Chinese data servers.

The Indian government banned the apps on Monday 29 June 2020, citing that they were “prejudicial to the sovereignty and integrity of India, defense of India, the security of the state and public order.” Though the government was mulling over the issue since early June, the decision came after violent clashes took place between the Indian Army and People’s Liberation Army.

Reacting to the ban, the Chinese government, on Tuesday 30 June 2020, said that it was “strongly concerned” about the ban and such actions will prove to be against “India’s interests”.

Two days after the remarks made by the Chinese government, Chinese commerce ministry spokesperson Gao Feng said that India’s actions regarding the ban of Chinese apps violate the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. He also mentioned that no such action has been taken by the Chinese government against Indian goods and services.

In addition to this, a Chinese economist connected with a think tank in Beijing said, “Hi-tech FDI from China legally flew into India, and was welcomed by the Indian government. But now, without going through any legal process or necessary warning, the Chinese FDI has been blocked overnight.” He pointed out that the Indian decision violates WTO rules.

Clarifying about the impact of this ban on other foreign investments in India, the foreign ministry spokesperson Anurag Srivastava said, software and internet applications firms in India “have to abide by the rules and regulations issued by the relevant ministries and departments, including those pertaining to data security and privacy of individual data.”

India welcomes foreign investments and has one of the most open FDI regimes, “but this will have to be in accordance with the rules and regulatory framework established by the government,” he added.

A professor of economics in Jawaharlal Nehru University, Prof. Biswajit Dhar, said that China cannot sue India for banning these apps as it will lack sufficient and reasonable ground for instituting a case in WTO. He added, “The apps are not likely to be protected by any forms of Intellectual Property Rights. Chinese firms could have claimed the apps as their assets, but we don’t have an investment treaty with China and investments are not under WTO’s purview. Had we joined RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership), which includes an investment agreement, things would have been different.”

On Tuesday 30 June 2020, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian said, “China is strongly concerned about the relevant notice issued by the Indian side. We are checking on and verifying the situation.”

“The Indian government has the responsibility to uphold the legitimate and legal rights of the international investors, including the Chinese ones,” he added.

India accounted for roughly 30 percent of the total 611 million downloads of the Chinese app TikTok, reported the state-controlled China Daily. The ban will pose as “a big stumbling block” for Chinese internet entities, which are completely dependent on the number of users and online traffic on their platforms to gain a market position overseas, said Raymond Wang, partner at consultancy Ronald Berger.

Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
To uphold presumption of guilt under Section 29 POCSO Act, foundational facts must be proved, reiterates Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court reiterates that to uphold the presumption of guilt under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, the prosecution must prove the ‘foundational facts’ beyond reasonable doubt.

16 April, 2024 12:54 PM
Trending Judiciary
Baba Ramdev, Acharya Balkrishna offer to make public apology in SC for misleading advertisements

Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna offer public apology in SC for misleading ads, court deliberates acceptance.

16 April, 2024 01:57 PM


Trending Business
SC sets aside judgment upholding arbitral award against DMRC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court overturns arbitral award favoring Reliance Infrastructure subsidiary against DMRC, citing grave miscarriage of justice.

11 April, 2024 11:43 AM
Trending Political NEWS
Delhi HC rejects third plea for Arvind Kejriwal's removal as Delhi CM, blasts petitioner for abuse of judicial process [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court dismisses the third PIL plea before it seeking Aam Aadmi Party leader Arvind Kejriwal’s removal as Chief Minister of Delhi, imposes Rs. 50,000 cost on petitioner.

11 April, 2024 03:29 PM
Trending Judiciary
Use of social media to interfere with administration of justice needs serious consideration: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court warns against social media misuse in legal matters, cautions against prejudicial posts interfering with justice.

11 April, 2024 05:44 PM
Trending Legal Insiders
Two-day conference on April 13-14 on Technology and Dialogue between SC and Singapore

Explore AI's role in law at the India-Singapore Supreme Court conference on technology, enhancing judicial processes and access to justice, April 13-14, 2024.

12 April, 2024 06:16 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email