38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

British political commentator Sami Hamdi detained by U.S. federal authorities over remarks on Middle East

By Tushit Pandey      28 October, 2025 03:27 PM      0 Comments
British political commentator Sami Hamdi detained by US federal authorities over remarks on Middle East

California: British national Sami Hamdi, a commentator on Middle East affairs, was detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) at San Francisco International Airport (SFO) on Sunday, 26 October 2025, after participating in a speaking tour across the United States. Hamdi had entered the country on 19 October 2025 on a visitor visa. According to ICE, his visa was revoked on 24 October, rendering his presence in the country unlawful. The agency said he is currently in ICE custody pending removal proceedings. Hamdi had addressed the annual gala of the Sacramento chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) on 25 October and was scheduled to participate in another event the following morning.

A senior U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the detention was linked to Hamdi’s public remarks about the Middle East, including criticism of the Israeli government, amid ongoing regional tensions. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) confirmed that Hamdi is in ICE custody and undergoing standard immigration review procedures.

Legal basis for detention: immigration enforcement and speech implications

Hamdi’s detention falls under U.S. immigration law, particularly the provisions governing entry at ports of entry and visa revocation. ICE has authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b) to detain individuals arriving at U.S. ports of entry who are deemed inadmissible or subject to expedited removal. In this case, the visa revocation occurred during his visit, prompting immigration authorities to act.

Legal experts note that while the U.S. government has broad discretion in enforcing immigration laws, detentions or visa revocations linked to speech-related activities raise constitutional concerns. U.S. citizens and certain non-citizens present in the country enjoy protections under the First Amendment; however, individuals denied admission or subject to removal have limited constitutional safeguards.

The Sacramento CAIR chapter described Hamdi’s detention as “a troubling development” and said it plans to file a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that due-process protections under the Fifth Amendment may have been violated. His case comes amid heightened scrutiny by immigration authorities of foreign nationals participating in political events, particularly those commenting on international conflicts. Observers note that visa revocations and removals on foreign-policy grounds have increased under the current administration.

The British Embassy in Washington, D.C., acknowledged the incident and said it is in contact with U.S. authorities to ensure Hamdi’s rights are upheld under diplomatic and consular arrangements. Under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, detained foreign nationals are entitled to consular access, and U.S. authorities are obliged to notify the relevant consulate without delay.

As of 28 October 2025, Hamdi remains in ICE custody at an undisclosed federal facility in California, with legal proceedings expected to begin in the coming days before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR).



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

British political commentator Sami Hamdi detained by U.S. federal authorities over remarks on Middle East British political commentator Sami Hamdi detained by U.S. federal authorities over remarks on Middle East

British commentator Sami Hamdi detained by U.S. ICE at SFO after visa revocation; detention linked to his remarks on Middle East and free speech concerns.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email