38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

Devas Wins 9-Year-Old Legal Battle Against Antrix as US Court Awards it with $1.2 Billion Compensation

By Twinkle Agarwal      31 October, 2020 05:56 PM      0 Comments
Devas Wins 9-Year-Old Legal Battle Against Antrix as US Court Awards itwith $1.2 Billion Compensation

An dispute took place in January 2005 between Indian startup Devas Multimedia and Indian Space Research Organisations (Isros) commercial arm Antrix Corporation wherein it was agreed that Antrix would launch and operate two satellites Gsat-6 and Gsat-6A and make available 70 Mhz of S-band spectrum to Devas. But unfortunately, it happened that Gsat-6A lost in space in 2018 because of which Antrix has to cancel its deal. 

Devas moved the Supreme court alleging that Antrix wrongfully terminated the deal and that it should be compensated. The apex court ordered Antrix to pay the compensation. 

The suit was brought in US court where Antrix informed that there was no corruption or wrongful termination of the deal but the cancellation was due to jurisdictional issues. The US court heard both sides and asked both to Submit a joint status report by April 15 2020 staying the case for 1 year. By July 2020 both of them submitted their report.

Finally, the US court gave its judgment that Antrix must pay compensation of $1.2 billion to Devas in the 2005 satellite deal case. The nine-year-old case was finally solved and the battle was won by Devas.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email