38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 31, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

Devas Wins 9-Year-Old Legal Battle Against Antrix as US Court Awards it with $1.2 Billion Compensation

By Twinkle Agarwal      31 October, 2020 05:56 PM      0 Comments
Devas Wins 9-Year-Old Legal Battle Against Antrix as US Court Awards itwith $1.2 Billion Compensation

An dispute took place in January 2005 between Indian startup Devas Multimedia and Indian Space Research Organisations (Isros) commercial arm Antrix Corporation wherein it was agreed that Antrix would launch and operate two satellites Gsat-6 and Gsat-6A and make available 70 Mhz of S-band spectrum to Devas. But unfortunately, it happened that Gsat-6A lost in space in 2018 because of which Antrix has to cancel its deal. 

Devas moved the Supreme court alleging that Antrix wrongfully terminated the deal and that it should be compensated. The apex court ordered Antrix to pay the compensation. 

The suit was brought in US court where Antrix informed that there was no corruption or wrongful termination of the deal but the cancellation was due to jurisdictional issues. The US court heard both sides and asked both to Submit a joint status report by April 15 2020 staying the case for 1 year. By July 2020 both of them submitted their report.

Finally, the US court gave its judgment that Antrix must pay compensation of $1.2 billion to Devas in the 2005 satellite deal case. The nine-year-old case was finally solved and the battle was won by Devas.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

wifes-domestic-violence-complaint-filed-after-divorce-petition-amounts-to-fresh-cruelty-condonation-cannot-bar-relief-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Wife’s Domestic Violence Complaint Filed After Divorce Petition Amounts to Fresh Cruelty; Condonation Cannot Bar Relief: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC grants divorce, holds wife’s post-petition DV complaint amounts to fresh cruelty; condonation cannot bar relief.

30 March, 2026 05:15 PM
daughter-in-law-not-legally-obligated-to-maintain-parents-in-law-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Daughter-in-Law Not Legally Obligated to Maintain Parents-in-Law: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules daughter-in-law not liable to maintain parents-in-law under BNSS; moral obligation not legally enforceable.

30 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM
karnataka-hc-quashes-fir-against-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-in-bengaluru-land-encroachment-case
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar In Bengaluru Land Encroachment Case

Karnataka HC quashes FIR against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bengaluru land encroachment case, holding no direct role and limiting relief to him alone.

26 March, 2026 03:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email