38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, March 29, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

Elon Musk's tweets allegedly breach a court order established as part of a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission

By Saakshi Singh Rawat      16 June, 2021 05:23 PM      0 Comments
 Elon Musk's tweets allegedly breach a court order established as part of a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission

According to data received by the Wall Street Journal on 1st June 2021, Elon Musk twice disobeyed a court order prohibiting him from illegally using Twitter to influence the stock market.

Musk allegedly committed deception by tweeting about a prospective purchase of his firm on 7th August 2018, according to a lawsuit filed by the Securities & Exchange Commission. Musk said that he was contemplating taking Tesla private and had acquired the necessary funds. The Saudi Arabian sovereign wealth fund was said to be the source of money at the time. According to Fortune, Musk is the second-richest person in the world, with a net worth of $156 billion.

Musk's blog post:

He departed the 31st July conference convinced that an agreement with the Saudi sovereign fund could be reached, and that all that remained was to get the process moving. And that is why, in the 7th August statement, he mentioned "financing secured."

The SEC lawsuit was settled for a total of $20 million between Musk and Tesla. The agreement stipulates that Musk's tweets would indeed be reviewed by corporate lawyers without first being released, in addition to him stepping down as CEO.

The SEC warned Tesla on 20th May 2020 that the company had failed to enforce these procedures and controls despite repeated violations by Mr. Musk. The letter added, Tesla has abdicated the duties required of it by the courts order.

On 20th May 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a warning to Tesla, saying the firm had failed to implement these policies and controls despite Mr. Musk's repeated violations. Tesla has surrendered the duties expected of it by the court's order, the letter continued.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

court-uses-doll-to-record-testimony-of-deaf-mute-rape-victim-conviction-upheld
Trending Judiciary
Court Uses Doll to Record Testimony of Deaf-Mute Rape Victim, Conviction Upheld [Read Judgment]

Chhattisgarh HC upheld a rape conviction, recognising doll-assisted gestural testimony of a deaf-mute victim as valid and reliable evidence.

28 March, 2026 02:30 PM

TOP STORIES

conversion-to-religion-other-than-hinduism-buddhism-or-sikhism-strips-sc-status-sc
Trending Judiciary
Conversion To Religion Other Than Hinduism, Buddhism Or Sikhism Strips SC Status: SC

Supreme Court rules conversion from Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism leads to loss of SC status; SC/ST Act protection denied to Christian convert.

24 March, 2026 05:20 PM
privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email