38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

Elon Musk's tweets allegedly breach a court order established as part of a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission

By Saakshi Singh Rawat      16 June, 2021 05:23 PM      0 Comments
 Elon Musk's tweets allegedly breach a court order established as part of a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission

According to data received by the Wall Street Journal on 1st June 2021, Elon Musk twice disobeyed a court order prohibiting him from illegally using Twitter to influence the stock market.

Musk allegedly committed deception by tweeting about a prospective purchase of his firm on 7th August 2018, according to a lawsuit filed by the Securities & Exchange Commission. Musk said that he was contemplating taking Tesla private and had acquired the necessary funds. The Saudi Arabian sovereign wealth fund was said to be the source of money at the time. According to Fortune, Musk is the second-richest person in the world, with a net worth of $156 billion.

Musk's blog post:

He departed the 31st July conference convinced that an agreement with the Saudi sovereign fund could be reached, and that all that remained was to get the process moving. And that is why, in the 7th August statement, he mentioned "financing secured."

The SEC lawsuit was settled for a total of $20 million between Musk and Tesla. The agreement stipulates that Musk's tweets would indeed be reviewed by corporate lawyers without first being released, in addition to him stepping down as CEO.

The SEC warned Tesla on 20th May 2020 that the company had failed to enforce these procedures and controls despite repeated violations by Mr. Musk. The letter added, Tesla has abdicated the duties required of it by the courts order.

On 20th May 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a warning to Tesla, saying the firm had failed to implement these policies and controls despite Mr. Musk's repeated violations. Tesla has surrendered the duties expected of it by the court's order, the letter continued.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email