38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, March 21, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

Fortnite Creator Epic Games takes legal action against Google in Australia

By Aditi Aggarwal      13 March, 2021 01:31 PM      0 Comments
Fortnite Creator Epic Games takes legal action against Google in Australia

Following a court action against Apple, launched in November last year, Epic Games has now launched a new legal action against Google in Australia over alleged anti-competitive behaviour after Fortnite was kicked off the Google Play store last year. Documents have been filed in the federal court on Wednesday (March 10, 2021).

Fortnite Epic bypassed the companies in-app payment methods in favour of its own cheaper direct billing that prevented Apple and Google taking a share, typically around 30% of the purchase price, due to which it was kicked off in August last year by both the Apple App Store and Google Play Store.

Allegations by Epic Games:

Google has declined to comment on the matter while Epic came with a no. of allegations against it.

Epic alleges Google has harmed app developers and consumers in Australia by restricting competition and innovation through preventing choice over app distribution and in-app payments on Android devices.

Googles conduct inflates the price for apps and in-app content for millions of Android device users in Australia, the filing stated.

Unlike Apples closed-garden iOS operating system, it is possible to download apps to Android devices outside of the Google Play Store by going to the app developers website. Thus, it is still possible to download Fortnite onto Android devices, but Epic stated in the filing that Google imposes technical barriers on direct downloading, including security warnings sent to users who try to do so.

Direct downloads of apps do not allow for developers to push out updates, the filing noted.

Epic founder and CEO Tim Sweeney said in a statement that Google had given the illusion of being open by arguing about the existence of alternative app stores and direct downloads on Android but these alternative methods of app downloads were rarely used.

The barriers Google places on Android OS are real. In the case of direct downloading, it makes the process so difficult and scary that it deters users from downloading apps from third party-websites even though it is a totally normal way for users to get apps on a desktop, he said.

Epic Games also accused Google of misusing its market power and engaging in exclusive dealing.

We believe consumers have the right to install apps from sources of their choosing and developers have the right to compete in a fair marketplace, it has been said.

Statement by Apple:

In August, an Apple spokesperson said that:

Epics actions in seeking to bypass the in-app purchasing system were expressly about violating App Store guidelines designed to protect customers.

Their reckless behaviour made pawns of customers, and we look forward to making this clear to Australian courts, she said.

An interlocutory hearing for the Apple case is set down for 23 March and the first Google case management hearing is set for 24 March. Earlier this month, court set aside a notice to produce from Epic to Apple seeking a wide variety of information about the Apple app store, including the number of Australian users, apps available, and earnings both in the store and through in-app purchases.

Justice Nye Perram is currently overseeing both the cases.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

failure-to-generate-profits-from-movie-does-not-indicate-dishonest-intent-civil-dispute-cannot-be-given-the-colour-of-a-criminal-offence-sc
Trending Judiciary
Failure To Generate Profits From Movie Does Not Indicate Dishonest Intent; Civil Dispute Cannot Be Given the Colour of a Criminal Offence: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes Section 420 IPC case against film producer, says failure to share movie profits shows civil dispute, not cheating.

20 March, 2026 01:37 PM
gujarat-hc-upholds-cat-order-directs-centre-to-appoint-physically-handicapped-candidate-as-postal-sorting-assistant
Trending Judiciary
Gujarat HC Upholds CAT Order, Directs Centre to Appoint Physically Handicapped Candidate as Postal Sorting Assistant [Read Judgment]

Gujarat HC upholds CAT order, directs Centre to appoint physically handicapped candidate as Postal Sorting Assistant, rejecting Union’s plea.

20 March, 2026 02:24 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-cancels-anticipatory-bail-in-scst-atrocities-case-says-police-reconciliation-cannot-bar-fir-for-criminal-acts
Trending Judiciary
SC Cancels Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Atrocities Case, Says Police Reconciliation Cannot Bar FIR for Criminal Acts [Read Order]

Supreme Court cancels anticipatory bail in SC/ST Act case, holding that police attempts at reconciliation cannot prevent registration of FIR for criminal acts.

16 March, 2026 02:44 PM
telangana-hc-sets-aside-dna-test-order-in-matrimonial-dispute-rules-child-cannot-be-used-as-pawn-to-prove-adultery
Trending Judiciary
Telangana HC Sets Aside DNA Test Order in Matrimonial Dispute; Rules Child Cannot Be Used as Pawn to Prove Adultery [Read Order]

Telangana High Court sets aside DNA test order in matrimonial dispute, holding a child cannot be used as a pawn to prove adultery against the mother.

16 March, 2026 05:35 PM
eviction-suit-over-petrol-pump-property-rejected-by-calcutta-hc-holds-dispute-commercial-in-nature-non-commercial-division-had-no-jurisdiction
Trending Judiciary
Eviction Suit Over Petrol Pump Property Rejected by Calcutta HC; Holds Dispute Commercial in Nature, Non-Commercial Division Had No Jurisdiction [Read Order]

Calcutta High Court rejects eviction suit over petrol pump property, holding the dispute commercial in nature and outside the jurisdiction of the non-commercial division.

16 March, 2026 06:00 PM
child-victims-in-pocso-cases-cannot-be-repeatedly-summoned-for-bail-hearings-or-evidence-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Victims in POCSO Cases Cannot Be Repeatedly Summoned for Bail Hearings or Evidence: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court rules child victims in POCSO cases cannot be repeatedly summoned for bail hearings or evidence, consolidates safeguards for vulnerable witnesses.

16 March, 2026 06:24 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email