38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, November 06, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

Hillary Clinton Sued By Tulsi Gabbard For $50M For Calling Her A Russian Asset

By LawStreet News Network      24 January, 2020 02:01 PM      0 Comments
Hillary Clinton Sued By Tulsi Gabbard For $50M For Calling Her A Russian AssetHillary Clinton Sued By Tulsi Gabbard For $50M For Calling Her A Russian AssetHillary Clinton Sued By Tulsi Gabbard For $50M For Calling Her A Russian Asset

Democratic presidential candidate and Hawaii Representative Tulsi Gabbard sued Hillary Clinton (2016 Democratic nominee and former Secretary of State) after Clinton called Gabbard a favorite of the Russians in October 2019. 

2020 contender Tulsi Gabbard alleges that Clinton made defamatory statements in deliberate attempt to derail her presidential campaign.

The lawsuit claims: The defamatory statements have caused Tulsi to lose potential donors and potential voters who heard the defamatory statements. Tulsi has suffered significant actual damages, personally and professionally, that are estimated to exceed $50m and continue to this day.

Gabbards allegations stem from an interview Clinton conducted with the Democratic strategist, author and podcaster David Plouffe in October 2019. Discussing the 2020 primary field, Clinton said of one candidate: She is a favourite of the Russians.

Excerpts from the interview: They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far. And, thats assuming Jill Stein [the Green Party nominee for president in 2016, who received favourable coverage from Russian state media] will give it up, which she might not because shes also a Russian asset. Yeah, shes a Russian asset.

A Clinton spokesman confirmed that Clinton was talking about Gabbard.

Tulsi is not a Russian asset, the filing says. No one Russia or anyone else controls her or her presidential campaign.

The lawsuit claims Clinton made the remark in retribution for Gabbard supporting Bernie Sanders in the 2016 primary and describes Clinton as a cut-throat politician who has never forgotten this perceived slight.

Gabbard also sued Google in 2019, claiming the company suspended her campaigns advertising after the first Democratic debate in June. A hearing is reportedly set for 27 January, 2020.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

instigation-for-suicide-need-not-be-compulsive-suggestive-words-enough-to-attract-section-306-ipc
Trending Judiciary
Instigation for Suicide Need Not Be Compulsive; Suggestive Words Enough to Attract Section 306 IPC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that instigation for suicide under Section 306 IPC need not be forceful; even suggestive words implying the consequence can attract liability.

05 November, 2025 04:10 PM
public-ground-cannot-be-reserved-for-any-religion-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Public Ground Cannot Be Reserved For Any Religion: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras HC rules public grounds cannot be reserved for any religion, allowing Annadhanam on village land and holding that law-and-order fears can’t curb fundamental rights.

05 November, 2025 05:10 PM

TOP STORIES

hit-and-run-accident-case-sc-transfers-trial-involving-judicial-officer-from-punjab-to-delhi
Trending Judiciary
Hit-and-run accident case: SC transfers trial involving judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi

SC shifts hit-and-run case involving probationer judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi over alleged bias; orders potential further probe by Delhi Police.

31 October, 2025 11:27 AM
sc-issues-stern-warning-to-state-bar-councils-over-excessive-enrolment-fees-threatens-contempt-action
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Stern Warning To State Bar Councils Over Excessive Enrolment Fees, Threatens Contempt Action [Read Order]

SC warns State Bar Councils to stop charging over ₹750 enrollment fee or face contempt; directs BCI to issue circular, return applicants’ documents immediately.

31 October, 2025 11:32 AM
lawyers-cant-be-summoned-for-legal-advice-unless-covered-under-exceptions-of-sec-132-bsa-sc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers can't be summoned for legal advice unless covered under exceptions of Sec 132 BSA: SC

Supreme Court rules lawyers cannot be summoned for legal advice unless exceptions under Sec 132 BSA apply, safeguarding lawyer-client privilege and legal profession autonomy.

31 October, 2025 02:29 PM
conviction-us-138-ni-act-cannot-be-ground-to-stop-pension-madras-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Conviction U/S 138 NI Act Cannot Be Ground To Stop Pension: Madras High Court [Read Order]

Madras HC rules conviction under Section 138 NI Act is not moral turpitude and cannot justify stopping pension of retired employee; directs release of dues.

01 November, 2025 04:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email