38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, November 04, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

After UK Court Rejects Vijay Mallya's Appeal; King of Good Times To Pursue Further Legal Remedies

By Ekta Varshney      21 April, 2020 09:41 PM      0 Comments
After UK Court Rejects Vijay Mallya's AppealAfter UK Court Rejects Vijay Mallya's Appeal

Vijay Mallya, business tycoon, on Monday(20th April 2020)was fighting a case of the expedition in London. The case was related to the fraud and money laundering amounting to an estimated Rs. 9,000 crore due to the collapse of his defunct company Kingfisher Airlines.

Mallya lost his High Court appeal in London against a 2018 decision to extradite him to India. The dismissal effectively clears the way for Vijay Mallya's extradition to India to face the charges in the Indian courts, with 14 days for him to apply for permission to appeal to the UK Supreme Court.

The case will now go to UK Home Secretary Priti Patel for a final call.

There are two facets for the appeal if he applies then the UK Home Office would wait for the outcome of that appeal. But in case he chose not to appeal under the India-UK Extradition Treaty, then the Court would be obliged to extradite Mallya to India within 28 days.

The business tycoon has businesses ranging from aviation to liquor. The 64-year old is wanted in India over Rs. 9,000 crore in loans Kingfisher took out from banks which the authorities argue he had no intention of repaying. Vijay Mallya denies the charges against him and is currently on bail.

Mallya's lawyer, Clare Montgomery, in February during a hearing said that the 2018 extradition ruling by Judge Emma A. Arbuthnot had "multiple errors" because she did not take into account all the evidence about the financial status of Kingfisher Airlines.

The Royal Courts of Justice in London, headed by 2 judge Bench of Lord Justice Stephen Irwin and Justice Elisabeth Laing. The judges presiding over the appeal dismissed the appeal. The judgement was handed down remotely due to the current coronavirus lockdown. The Judges ruled, "We have held there is a prima facie case both of misrepresentation and of conspiracy, and thus there is also a prima facie case of money laundering," the High Court concluded."

Vijay Mallya can appeal against the High Court order in the Supreme Court within 14 days, failing which India will start the extradition process, provided by the Indian agencies investigating the case. An official said, "UK Extradition Act permits appeal before the Supreme Court only if there is a "significant point of law" to be settled... that too within a period of 14 days. Even if he chooses for an appeal, it's unlikely to be permitted as there is no significant point of law to be settled in this case. Mallya's extradition is confirmed and sealed."

A number of times the business tycoon has affirmed the Indian banks to take back 100 per cent of the principal amount owed to them.

In February, King Fisher's Owner said, "I am saying, please banks take your money. The ED is saying no, we have a claim over these assets. So, the ED on the one side and the banks on the other are fighting over the same assets... What all they are doing to me for the last four years is totally unreasonable."

Mallyas return would be a good stroke in the court of Narendra Modi as he is under huge pressure from the opposition to bring justice for several people who have fled India in recent years to escape prosecution, many for loan defaults.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM

TOP STORIES

lawyers-to-stop-arguing-when-court-indicates-its-mind-sc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers to stop arguing when court indicates its mind: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Lawyers must stop arguing once court indicates its mind, stressing that harmony between Bench and Bar ensures dignified court functioning.

29 October, 2025 04:25 PM
wangchuks-detention-order-suffers-from-gross-illegality-and-arbitrariness-activists-wife-tells-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wangchuk's detention order suffers from gross illegality and arbitrariness, activist's wife tells SC

Wife of activist Sonam Wangchuk tells SC his detention under NSA suffers from illegality, citing stale FIRs, procedural lapses, and denial of fair representation.

29 October, 2025 04:35 PM
police-can-register-fir-for-threatening-witness-courts-complaint-not-needed-sc
Trending Judiciary
Police can register FIR for threatening witness; court's complaint not needed: SC [Read Judgment]

SC says police can directly file FIR for witness threats under Section 195A IPC; no court complaint needed as it’s a cognisable offence.

29 October, 2025 04:44 PM
sc-hints-at-pan-india-guidelines-on-timeline-to-frame-charges
Trending Judiciary
SC hints at pan-India guidelines on timeline to frame charges

SC mulls pan-India guidelines to curb delays in framing charges; notes cases where charges aren’t framed even after years despite BNSS mandate of 60 days.

30 October, 2025 12:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email