38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, October 13, 2024
International

Lawsuit Filed Against NY Over Rules Barring Weddings of More Than 50 People

By M V Manasa      02 September, 2020 04:12 PM      0 Comments
Lawsuit Filed Against NY Over Rules Barring Weddings of More Than People 50.

Two wedding venues filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of New York against the State over the coronavirus rule barring ceremonies with more people than 50. Attorney Chad Davenport who filed a suit on Friday (August 29,2020) said that at present, you can gather in crowds to protest in New York but you cant married if you want to invite more than 50 guests. He also said that it makes no sense but its also a constitutional law question. 

Attorney Davenport filed the suit on behalf of Bill and Teds Riviera restaurant in Massapequa on Long Island and a Saugerities based banquet business upstate. Attorney Davenport who represented Pamella Giglia and Joe Durolek who filed suit alongside since-married couple Jenna DiMartile and Justin Crawford, claiming that Gov. Andrew Cuomos executive order limiting social gatherings to 50 people or less is unfair and uneven, while protests, graduation, and restaurants have much larger group gatherings. Gigilia and Durolek had their wedding scheduled in August but with the rule that gatherings should not be more than 50, they postponed their wedding.

DiMartile and Crawfords wedding with the gathering of 115 guests was allowed by the Lower Court Judge but then the state appealed that decision and asked for a stay of the ruling, which if they won would essentially halt the Giglia-Durolek wedding-pending appeal. The lower court denied the stay on August 19, 2020.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

plea-filed-in-sc-for-restoring-statehood-of-j-and-k
Trending Judiciary
Plea filed in SC for restoring statehood of J&K

A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking a direction to restore statehood of Jammu and Kashmir as per the assurance given before it in the case titled as 'In re Article 370 of the Constitution', in a time bound manner within a period of two months.

09 October, 2024 03:18 PM
sc-dismisses-plea-for-review-of-judgment-on-electoral-bonds-scheme
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea for review of judgment on Electoral Bonds Scheme [Read Order]

The Supreme Court has dismissed a petition seeking review of the February 15, 2024 Constitution bench judgment which struck down the 2018 Electoral Bonds scheme as unconstitutional.

09 October, 2024 03:41 PM
sc-rejects-review-plea-against-judgment-allowing-states-to-levy-tax-on-minerals
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects review plea against judgment allowing states to levy tax on minerals [Read Order]

The Supreme Court has rejected a review petition against its July 25 judgment which held that States have got legislative competence to levy tax on mineral-bearing lands.

09 October, 2024 03:53 PM
sc-dismisses-review-plea-against-aug-1-judgment-on-sub-classification-of-sc-sts
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses review plea against Aug 1 judgment on sub classification of SC/STs [Read Order]

The Supreme Court has dismissed a plea for review of its August 1, 2024 judgment which allowed the States to sub classify Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to provide preferential treatment to the disadvantaged groups among them in government jobs and education.

09 October, 2024 04:05 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email