38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

Pakistan Court Suspends Jail Sentences Of Nawaz Sharif, Daughter Maryam

By LawStreet News Network      19 September, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Islamabad High Court

The Islamabad High Court on September 19, 2018, suspended the jail sentences handed to former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, his daughter Maryam Nawaz and son-in-law Mohammad Safdar in the Avenfield corruption reference case.

The matter came up for hearing before a two-judge bench on an appeal filed by the Sharifs and Capt. Safdar against the verdict announced by the Accountability Court on July 6, 2018.

The court suspending their sentences have directed the trio to submit bail bonds worth Rs. 0.5 million each. They will be released from Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi after completion of formalities by today or Thursday.

While suspending the sentences, Justice Athar Minallah remarked that the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) couldnt bring any evidence of Sharifs ownership of the Avenfield apartments. The NAB, after conducting a thorough investigation, couldnt bring any evidence of Nawaz Sharifs ownership of the Avenfield apartments. You want us to admit his ownership on mere presumption, Justice Minallah asked.

To this, NABs special prosecutor Mohammad Akram Qureshi said that the law of evidence empowers the court to presume facts in certain situations.

Earlier, on July 6, 2018, the Accountability Court Islamabad sentenced Sharif, Maryam Nawaz and Safdar to ten, seven and two years in imprisonment after finding them guilty over the familys ownership of four luxury flats in London. Moreover, the Supreme Court last year disqualified Sharif from holding the office of prime minister after the Panama Papers scandal.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email