38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, March 04, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

US Supreme Court Upholds denial of Qualified Immunity to County Clerk Who Refused to Register Same-Sex Marriage

By Parul Singhal      07 October, 2020 12:05 PM      0 Comments
Same-Sex Marriage US Supreme Court

The United States Supreme court, on Monday, (5th Oct 2020), upheld the denial of qualified immunity to a former County Clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to the same-sex couple.  

Kim Davis who was the former county clerk refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The suit was filed by one of the couples before the District Court seeking damages for violation of their right to marry. 

The contention of Davis is based on Sovereign immunity and qualified immunity. Sovereign Immunity shielded her from suit in her official capacity and qualified immunity shielded her from individual capacity. However, Davis did not get qualified immunity because the defense of qualified immunity can only be attained if, 

  1. She didnt violate any of the plaintiffs constitutional right or,
  2. The rights, if violated werent clearly established at the time of alleged misconduct.

The District Court held that qualified immunity didnt shield her and the Court of Appeals further dismissed the appeal. 

Davis then moved US Supreme Court by way of a Writ of Certiorari against the order passed by the Court of Appeals. The US Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeals. 

Justice Clarence Thomas in a statement noted that, in Obergefell v. Hodges, 57 U.S. 644 (2015), the right to same-sex marriage was read into the fourteenth Amendment, even though that right is found nowhere in the text. 

Davis may have been one of the first victims of this Courts cavalier treatment of religion in its Obergefell decision, but she will not be the last. The judge observed. 

The Judge, though noted that the petition raised important questions about the scope of the decision in Obergefell, said that it does not cleanly present them. By choosing to privilege a novel constitutional right over the religious liberty interests explicitly protected in the First Amendment, and by doing so undemocratically, the Court has created a problem that only it can fix. By a 5:4 majority, the US Supreme Court in Obergefell ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

rouse-avenue-court-discharges-arvind-kejriwal-manish-sisodia-and-21-others-in-delhi-excise-policy-case-slams-cbi-for-lack-of-evidence
Trending Executive
Rouse Avenue Court Discharges Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 Others in Delhi Excise Policy Case; Slams CBI for Lack of Evidence

Rouse Avenue Court discharges Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 others in Delhi Excise Policy case, citing lack of evidence.

27 February, 2026 12:29 PM
sc-imposes-blanket-ban-on-ncert-class-8-social-science-book-over-corruption-in-judiciary-chapter-issues-contempt-notices
Trending Judiciary
SC Imposes Blanket Ban on NCERT Class 8 Social Science Book Over ‘Corruption in Judiciary’ Chapter, Issues Contempt Notices [Read Order]

Supreme Court bans NCERT Class 8 textbook over ‘Corruption in Judiciary’ chapter, issues contempt notices and orders nationwide seizure.

27 February, 2026 01:00 PM
sc-holds-limitation-in-drugs-and-cosmetics-act-prosecution-begins-when-identity-of-accused-is-known-not-from-date-of-complaint
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Limitation in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Prosecution Begins When Identity of Accused Is Known, Not From Date of Complaint [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules limitation in Drugs Act cases begins when identity of accused is known, not from first complaint; Section 202 CrPC not mandatory for public servants.

27 February, 2026 01:30 PM
maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email