38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, June 02, 2023
Top Stories
Interviews Know The Law Book Reviews Videos
About Us Contact Us

US Supreme Court Upholds denial of Qualified Immunity to County Clerk Who Refused to Register Same-Sex Marriage

By Parul Singhal      Oct 07, 2020      0 Comments      957 Views
Same-Sex Marriage US Supreme Court

The United States Supreme court, on Monday, (5th Oct 2020), upheld the denial of qualified immunity to a former County Clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to the same-sex couple.  

Kim Davis who was the former county clerk refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The suit was filed by one of the couples before the District Court seeking damages for violation of their right to marry. 

The contention of Davis is based on Sovereign immunity and qualified immunity. Sovereign Immunity shielded her from suit in her official capacity and qualified immunity shielded her from individual capacity. However, Davis did not get qualified immunity because the defense of qualified immunity can only be attained if, 

  1. She didn’t violate any of the plaintiff’s constitutional right or,
  2. The rights, if violated weren’t “clearly established” at the time of alleged misconduct.

The District Court held that qualified immunity didn’t shield her and the Court of Appeals further dismissed the appeal. 

Davis then moved US Supreme Court by way of a Writ of Certiorari against the order passed by the Court of Appeals. The US Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeals. 

Justice Clarence Thomas in a statement noted that, in Obergefell v. Hodges, 57 U.S. 644 (2015), the right to same-sex marriage was read into the fourteenth Amendment, “even though that right is found nowhere in the text’’. 

“Davis may have been one of the first victims of this Court’s cavalier treatment of religion in its Obergefell decision, but she will not be the last.” The judge observed. 

The Judge, though noted that the petition raised important questions about the scope of the decision in Obergefell, said that it does not cleanly present them”. By choosing to privilege a novel constitutional right over the religious liberty interests explicitly protected in the First Amendment, and by doing so undemocratically, the Court has created a problem that only it can fix. By a 5:4 majority, the US Supreme Court in Obergefell ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution.

same-sex couplesUnited States Supreme Court
Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Related Posts
View All




Lawstreet Advertisement

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email