38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

Interrogate Chief Executive Sundar Pichai

By Komal Kinger      06 January, 2022 03:32 PM      0 Comments
Sundar Pichai Alphabet Inc Google

A California federal judge has ordered that plaintiffs who allege Alphabet Inc's Google of illegally tracking their internet activity while in "Incognito" browsing mode can interrogate Chief Executive Sundar Pichai for up to two hours.

Customers accused Google of illegally breaching their privacy by tracking internet activity while Google Chrome browsers were switched to "private" mode in a complaint filed in June 2020.

As per the court filing, the plaintiffs claim that Pichai has "unique, personal knowledge" of issues connected to the Chrome browser and privacy concerns.

The additional requests, according to Google spokesman Jos Castaeda are "unjustified and overstepping."

"While we strongly disagree with the plaintiffs' claims in this lawsuit, we have complied with their numerous requests... We will continue to fight back vehemently " Castaneda explained.

"According to the Hon'ble Court, Sundar Pichai was advised in 2019 that referring to the company's Incognito browsing mode as "private" was inappropriate, but he persisted because he did not want the function under the limelight."

On 27th December 2021, U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen in San Jose, California, ruled that "a few papers indicate that particular pertinent information was transmitted to, and perhaps from, Pichai," and therefore supported a request from the plaintiffs' counsel to interrogate him".

Google previously stated that Incognito just prohibits data from being stored on a user's device and that it is contesting the lawsuit.

In recent years, as public awareness about online spying has grown, the Alphabet unit's privacy disclosures have drawn regulatory and judicial attention.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email