38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

Tennessee Man Arrested For Lighting Ganja Cigarette In Court While Facing Charges For Possession Of Ganja

By Aarya Mishra      31 January, 2020 04:01 PM      1 Comments
Tennessee Man

A 20 year old US man named Spencer Boston was arrested on Monday (January 27, 2020) for lighting a ganja cigarette in the court room where he was facing charges for the possession of weed. This persons video has been flooding the internet, and has become viral within a matter of a few days where in the Court room he is seen lighting a cannabis cigarette saying, Marijuana is harmless and should be legalized, people deserve better. He said all that in the presence of a Judge and other officers.

As per the officer Lt. Scott Moore from the Wilson County Sheriffs Department, Spencer was called before the Judge Haywood Barry, when he started talking about making marijuana legal. But things got rough when he pulled a ganja cigarette from his pocket and lit it in the courtroom.

The officers soon detained him while he was able to take a few puffs and threw the cigarette towards the people sitting saying, The people deserve better. For this unprecedented act Boston was charged with possession of marijuana and disorderly conduct. He has also been held for contempt of court for what he did. He has been taken into custody for 10 days by the police, said Lt. Scott Moore to CNN.

The next date of his hearing before the court is on April 14, 2020.

The laws regarding possession and usage of marijuana in the United States is listed in the Controlled Substances Act, 1971 (CSA). The CSA classifies and regulates illegal drugs, and lists them according to their medicinal use and potential for abuse. Marijuana is listed as a Schedule 1 controlled substance. This schedule is for drugs that have high chances of potential abuse and hardly any medicinal value. Anyone who grows, markets or stores it; is in violation of a number of federal laws. The CSA further makes it unlawful to knowingly open, lease, rent, maintain or use property for the manufacturing, storing or distribution of controlled substances.

Sanctions on the violation of CSA

Simple possession with no intent to further distribute comes under misdemeanor and is punishable with fine of $1000 and up to 1 year in prison Individuals involved in business of marijuana can receive up to 5 years of prison time along with a fine up to $250,000. There are some states which want to legalize marijuana and in some states it is already legal but this will have no impact on the federal law or the CSA. In 2005 Congress constitutional authority under the commerce clause to ban local marijuana production and consumption was affirmed by the Supreme Court in Gonzales v. RaiIn the Commerce Clause, Congress has the power to regulate purely local activities that are a part of an economic class of activities that have significant effect on interstate commerce. This is the reason why no state will affect the federal classification of a Class 1 controlled substance.   

Common issues with Federal Marijuana Laws

Some common conflict areas with marijuana laws is that in terms of employment you can be fired from your job due to use of marijuana during office hours. Renters can face eviction though their marijuana use is under the state laws, many banks avoid giving credit facility to participants of the marijuana industry. 

Author: Aarya Mishra



Share this article:



John Doe
Rctcpgi Oct 13, 2020

It is a great blog post.I am always read your blog helpful and informative tips. I like it thanks for sharing this information with us

Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-offence-under-sc-st-act-if-alleged-casteist-abuse-occurred-inside-private-house-sc
Trending Judiciary
No Offence Under SC/ST Act If Alleged Casteist Abuse Occurred Inside Private House: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules SC/ST Act offence is not made out if alleged casteist abuse occurred inside a private house without public view.

14 May, 2026 03:16 PM
madras-hc-bars-tiruppattur-mla-from-floor-test-over-disputed-one-vote-victory
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bars Tiruppattur MLA From Floor Test Over Disputed One-Vote Victory [Read Order]

Madras High Court restrains Tiruppattur MLA from floor test participation over disputed one-vote victory and alleged electoral irregularities.

14 May, 2026 03:24 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-refers-to-larger-bench-issue-on-stage-of-hearing-accused-under-section-223-bnss-before-cognizance
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Refers to Larger Bench Issue on Stage of Hearing Accused Under Section 223 BNSS Before Cognizance [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court refers to Larger Bench issue on when accused must be heard under Section 223 BNSS before taking cognizance.

09 May, 2026 10:25 AM
hymen-intact-does-not-mean-no-penetration-delhi-high-court-upholds-pocso-conviction-of-tenant-who-raped-six-year-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
‘Hymen Intact Does Not Mean No Penetration’: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction of Tenant Who Raped Six-Year-Old Girl [Read Order]

Delhi High Court upheld a tenant’s POCSO conviction for raping a six-year-old girl, holding that an intact hymen does not negate penetration.

09 May, 2026 12:42 PM
consumer-commission-directs-bus-operator-to-pay-50000-compensation-after-barat-reaches-wedding-destination-at-3-am-due-to-breakdown
Trending Judiciary
Consumer Commission Directs Bus Operator to Pay ₹50,000 Compensation After Barat Reaches Wedding Destination at 3 AM Due to Breakdown [Read Order]

Delhi Consumer Commission ordered a bus operator to pay ₹50,000 compensation after a Barat reached the wedding venue at 3 AM due to breakdown.

09 May, 2026 01:56 PM
sabarimala-reference-day-13-can-faith-justify-civil-death-and-genital-cutting-of-children-sc-bench-examines-religions-reach-over-the-body
Trending Judiciary
Sabarimala Reference Day 13: “Can Faith Justify Civil Death and Genital Cutting of Children?”: SC Bench Examines Religion’s Reach Over the Body

SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.

09 May, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email