38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 17, 2024

U.S. Appeals Court Validates Qualcomm’s Patent Licensing Practice in an Antitrust Lawsuit filed by the Federal Trade Commission [READ JUDGMENT]

By Saransh Awasthi      14 August, 2020 02:05 PM      0 Comments
US Appeals Court Validates Qualcomm Patent Licensing Practice

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Tuesday ( August 11 2020) reversed a 2019 ruling that found the San Diego-based chipmaker company, Qualcomm abusing its monopoly position in the market. A three-judge bench of the federal appeals court overruled the previous judgment of a District Court in an antitrust lawsuit brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) against Qualcomm's alleged anticompetitive practice requiring the phone manufacturers to sign a patent license agreement before selling them chips for their handsets. 

Qualcomm is the biggest supplier of wireless modem chips, however, most of the profit comes from patent royalties paid by the handset makers under a license agreement. The company has been oftentimes scrutinized for its business model and the same has been criticized by several phone manufacturing companies, most notably Apple, which supported the FTC’s orders granting injunction of the antitrust practice by Qualcomm had filed a separate lawsuit against the chip supplier which was later on settled in 2018. The Department of Justice had contended that the FTC’s ruling could undermine Qualcomm’s position in technologies, like 5G, that are essential for national security.

FTC has called the appeals court’s decision “disappointing”. “The court’s ruling is disappointing, and we will be considering our options”, said Ian Conner, director of the F.T.C.’s bureau of competition. The agency had argued that Qualcomm has abused its monopoly position for charging excessive royalty rates for its patents. It also mentioned Qualcomm making threats to cut off shipments of supplies to the phone makers.

The appeals court, however, ordered in favor of the San Diego-based-company ruling that the policy of not supplying chips to any phone maker who had not licensed its patents cannot be considered as an antitrust practice. It said, “Anticompetitive behavior is illegal under federal antitrust law… Hypercompetitive behavior is not.”

Qualcomm's general counsel in his statement said, “The Court of Appeals unanimous reversal, entirely vacating the District Court decision, validates our business model and patent licensing program and underscores the tremendous contributions that Qualcomm has made to the industry".

Qualcomm shares have risen to around 4 percent since the appeals court judgment. This victory clears the way for the company to continue with its original patent licensing contracts, otherwise, the district court’s ruling could have made the company to renegotiate its business model.



Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
To uphold presumption of guilt under Section 29 POCSO Act, foundational facts must be proved, reiterates Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court reiterates that to uphold the presumption of guilt under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, the prosecution must prove the ‘foundational facts’ beyond reasonable doubt.

16 April, 2024 12:54 PM
Trending Judiciary
Baba Ramdev, Acharya Balkrishna offer to make public apology in SC for misleading advertisements

Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna offer public apology in SC for misleading ads, court deliberates acceptance.

16 April, 2024 01:57 PM


Trending Business
SC sets aside judgment upholding arbitral award against DMRC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court overturns arbitral award favoring Reliance Infrastructure subsidiary against DMRC, citing grave miscarriage of justice.

11 April, 2024 11:43 AM
Trending Political NEWS
Delhi HC rejects third plea for Arvind Kejriwal's removal as Delhi CM, blasts petitioner for abuse of judicial process [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court dismisses the third PIL plea before it seeking Aam Aadmi Party leader Arvind Kejriwal’s removal as Chief Minister of Delhi, imposes Rs. 50,000 cost on petitioner.

11 April, 2024 03:29 PM
Trending Judiciary
Use of social media to interfere with administration of justice needs serious consideration: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court warns against social media misuse in legal matters, cautions against prejudicial posts interfering with justice.

11 April, 2024 05:44 PM
Trending Legal Insiders
Two-day conference on April 13-14 on Technology and Dialogue between SC and Singapore

Explore AI's role in law at the India-Singapore Supreme Court conference on technology, enhancing judicial processes and access to justice, April 13-14, 2024.

12 April, 2024 06:16 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email