38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, February 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

US senators question Apple and Google on app store dominance

By Snehal Khemka      23 April, 2021 05:19 PM      0 Comments
US senators question Apple and Google on app store dominance

A panel of U.S. senators questioned officials from Apple and Alphabet's Google on Wednesday (April 21, 2021) about the dominance of their mobile app stores and whether the companies abuse their power at the expense of smaller competitors.

Amy Klobuchar, the top Senate Democrat on antitrust issues, said that Apple and Google can use their power to "exclude or suppress apps that compete with their own products" and "charge excessive fees that affect competition."
 

The hearing occurred a day after Apple said that it would begin selling AirTags which can be attached to items like car keys to help users find them when they are lost in direct competition with Tile, which has sold a similar tracking device for more than a decade.

Prior to the hearing, Klobuchar told Reuters Apples announcement was the kind of conduct that her panel planned to discuss at the hearing.

Additionally, Apple said its AirTags were an outgrowth of its FindMy app, which is used for locating lost Apple devices and to share user locations and was introduced in 2010, before Tiles founding. 

Apple last month opened its operating system up to third-party item trackers and said that Chipolo, a startup that competes with both Tile and Apples new AirTags, is using the system.

Apples chief compliance officer, Kyle Andeer, testified at the hearing as well as Kirsten Daru, general counsel for Tile.

Quoting, 'Apple has once again exploited its market power and dominance to condition our customers access to data on effectively breaking our user experience and directing our users to FindMy, Tiles Daru testified that Apples FindMy program is installed by default as part of its operating system on all Apple phones, and cannot be deleted.

Others on the witness list were Google Government Affairs Senior Director Wilson White, Spotify Chief Legal Officer Horacio Gutierrez and Match Group Chief Legal Officer Jared Sine.

App makers like music streaming service Spotify and dating service firm Match, which owns the Tinder app, have long complained that mandatory revenue sharing and strict inclusion rules set by Apples App Store for iPhones and iPads, along with Googles Play store for Android devices, amount to anti-competitive behavior.

In his testimony, Sine argued that Google and Apple both exact an onerous 30 percent of any digital transaction, raising prices for consumers. He further stated that Match pays nearly USD 500 million in fees to the app store annually, the companys single largest expense.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

gauhati-hc-quashes-case-against-influencer-who-claimed-assamese-women-practise-black-magic-and-convert-men-into-animals
Trending Judiciary
Gauhati HC Quashes Case Against Influencer Who Claimed Assamese Women Practise Black Magic and Convert Men Into Animals [Read Order]

Gauhati High Court quashes case against influencer Abhishek Kar over remarks on black magic in Assam, holds offences under BNS, IT Act not made out.

11 February, 2026 03:08 PM
high-courts-cannot-nullify-arbitration-proceedings-while-substituting-arbitrators-sc
Trending Judiciary
High Courts Cannot Nullify Arbitration Proceedings While Substituting Arbitrators: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules High Courts cannot nullify arbitration proceedings while appointing substitute arbitrators under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration Act.

11 February, 2026 03:58 PM

TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email