38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, November 10, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

US Court Dismisses Case Against Cognizant and Facebook accusing them of failing to protect employees against psychological dangers posed by exposure to graphic images

By Pariyal Gupta      27 May, 2021 04:15 PM      0 Comments
US Court Dismisses Case Against Cognizant and Facebook accusing them of failing to protect employees against psychological dangers posed by exposure to graphic images

A United States court has dismissed a petition against tech giants Cognizant and Facebook who were accused of failing to protect their employees against psychological dangers posed by exposure to graphic images. 

The Court stated that the plaintiffs had failed to establish their case and dismissed the plaintiffs complaint of fraudulent misrepresentation and deliberate concealment by Cognizant. The Court also denied the plaintiffs request for attorneys fees. 

In February 2020, a class-action complaint had been filed against the two tech giants by over 3000 employees of Cognizant who were working as content moderators for Facebook. Facebook and Cognizant were accused of causing psychological trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) through exposure to graphic images.

The class-action complaint had been filed by members who are citizens of Florida and Arizona. Initial summons and complaints were issued to Cognizant in February, after which the plaintiffs through an amended class action complaint demanded a jury trial.

According to reports, the plaintiffs claim exceeds $5 Million. 

In their complaint, the plaintiffs set out in detail how repeated exposure to violent images was causing psychological trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). They backed their claims by relying on and citing numerous studies conducted by scientific organizations and government task forces. 

Cognizant was also accused of deliberate concealment or misrepresentation of facts of the psychological damage that would occur due to exposure to highly toxic, unsafe, and injurious content while providing content moderation services.

Cognizant was happy with the Courts decision and stated as thus We are pleased with the courts decision to dismiss the claims brought against Cognizant in this matter. Weve continued to advocate for and support initiatives that will limit exposure to objectionable online content for all users, including a $5 Million commitment to advance research, technology, and thought leadership designed to address these issues.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

faith-must-be-conviction-not-compulsion-in-tribal-conversion-cases-chhattisgarh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Faith Must Be Conviction, Not Compulsion, in Tribal Conversion Cases: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]

Chhattisgarh High Court rules that religious conversion in tribal areas must be based on conviction, not inducement or coercion, stressing protection of indigenous culture.

04 November, 2025 12:02 PM
allahabad-hc-quashes-false-religious-conversion-fir-imposes-75000-exemplary-costs-on-uttar-pradesh-govt
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Quashes False Religious Conversion FIR, Imposes ₹75,000 Exemplary Costs on Uttar Pradesh Govt [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court quashes false religious conversion FIR, slams police for illegal arrest, and orders ₹75,000 compensation for wrongful detention in UP.

04 November, 2025 12:17 PM
objection-petitions-under-section-47-cpc-should-not-be-treated-as-commencement-of-a-new-trial-sc
Trending Judiciary
Objection Petitions under Section 47 CPC should not be treated as commencement of a new trial: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that objections under Section 47 CPC cannot be treated as a new trial; abuse of process must be curbed to ensure decree-holders get justice.

04 November, 2025 12:42 PM
income-tax-reassessment-after-3-years-needs-chief-commissioner-approval-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Income Tax Reassessment After 3 Years Needs Chief Commissioner Approval: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules income tax reassessment beyond three years invalid without approval from top authority under new regime, ensuring taxpayer safeguards.

04 November, 2025 12:59 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email