38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, October 08, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Interview

Plea Filed in Delhi High Court to Cancel 'Adipurush' Certificate for Allegedly Hurting Hindu Sentiments

By Lawstreet Bharat      17 June, 2023 11:15 PM      0 Comments

NEW DELHI: A plea has been filed in the Delhi High Court for seeking cancellation of certificate of movie 'Adipurush' for hurting sentiments of Hindu community in the name of artistic representation and creative liberty.

The plea filed by 'Hindu Sena' through its national president Vishnu Gupta claimed that the depiction of Ravana, Lord Ram, Mata Sita and Hanuman in the feature film Adipurush is contrary to the image and descriptions of these religious leaders /characters/figures as depicted in Maharishi Valmiki's 'Ramayan' and Tulsidas' 'Ramcharitmanas'.

It sought a direction to the Centre and the Central Board of Film Certification to cancel to cancel the film's certificate and immediately ban it.

The petitioner contended the government has to ensure maintenance of public order as well as secular fabric of the society.

Film director Om Raut and producer T Series cannot be permitted to publicly exhibit any such feature film which may tend to disturb public order and secular fabric of the society.

The plea claimed the character of Hindu Gods and religious leaders, and characters like Lord Ram, Mata Sita, Hanuman and Ravan have been depicted in an inaccurate and inappropriate manner.

"The bearded look of Ravanas character played by Saif Ali khan in the film is hurting the sentiments of Hindu community as the Hindu Brahmin Ravana is shown making a ghastly face in a wrong manner which is an absolute insult to Hindu civilization, Hindu religious figures, idols, ideals, etc. The scene related to Ravana in the film is an absolute distortion from the real facts and story of Ramayana. Since these are essentially religious leaders / characters, the film makers, producers, and actors cannot be permitted to take an unimpeded creative liberty to commercialize the religious leaders / characters, their faces, personalities and looks including hair. This is a sheer violation of religious rights under Article 25 of the Constitution of India," the plea said.

It also claimed image of Lord Ram, Sita, and Hanuman have been shown in an objectionable manner as it has been done to hurt Hindu sentiments.

"The Hindus have a particular view of the image of Lord Ram, Sita, & Hanuman and any change / tampering of their divine image by the film producers, directors and actors would be a violation of their fundamental rights. Any feature film which is based on wrong depiction of Hindu religious leaders / characters would be violative of Article 25 & 26 of the Constitution of India," the plea said.

"To foster religious harmony, integrity and social order, mutual respect of every religion is sine qua non. Therefore, the Indian Constitution has made every citizens religion part of fundamental rights. Therefore, the film producers, directors, and actors are under constitutional obligations to ensure that religious feelings, sentiments and perceptions are not tinkered with in any manner whatsoever," it said.

The plea asserted that the inaccurate portrayal of the image of Lord Ram, Sita, Hanuman and Ravan are hurting Hindu sentiments which may affect public order and integrity. Therefore, the feature film Adipurush is liable to be not issued any certificate in terms of Section 5A of the Cinematograph Act, 1952. It is not suitable for unrestricted public exhibition, the plea filed through advocate Pratibha Sinha claimed.



Share this article:

About:
Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-to-hear-on-friday-plea-for-cbi-probe-into-karur-stampede
Trending Judiciary
SC to hear on Friday plea for CBI probe into Karur stampede

SC to hear on Friday a plea seeking CBI probe into the Karur stampede during actor Vijay’s rally that claimed 41 lives and injured over 100 people.

07 October, 2025 06:03 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email