38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, November 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

1984 Sikh Riots Case: SC Refuses To Grant Bail To Congressman Sajjan Kumar Sentenced To Life Imprisonment

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      15 February, 2020 07:02 AM      0 Comments
1984 Sikh Riots Case: SC Refuses To Grant Bail To Congressman Sajjan Kumar Sentenced To Life Imprisonment

On 14 February, 2020, the Supreme Court refused to grant interim bail to former Congressman Sajjan Kumar, sentenced to life imprisonment in the 1984 anti-Sikh riot trial. The top Court said it will hear his bail plea in summer vacations. 

The bench, led by Chief Justice Sharat Arvind Bobde, and Justice B R Gavai and Justice Surya Kant also claimed that it would consider the medical report of the AIIMS on the health status of Kumar after the conclusion of the Sabarimala reference hearing. 

Kumar was sentenced to life imprisonment by the High Court of Delhi on 17 December 2018.

"There are cases. But this case is different and you (Kumar) have been convicted by the High Court... You (senior lawyer Vikas Singh) argue at length during summer vacations," said the bench which also comprised Justices B R Gavai and Surya Kant.

"The defendant was 67 kg and has lost 13 kg in almost 13 months ... who will be liable if something happens to him," the lawyer said, adding that the application for bail should be considered as urgent.

Another senior advocate, Dushyant Dave, who claimed to be a survivor of violence, referred to the fate of two individuals convicted of hate crimes in the United States after 9/11 and stated that they had received the death penalty for the crime of murder within six months and that their application for the commutation of the death penalty had been refused.

"This is where 4,000 people were killed (during the anti-Sikh riots) and 2,000 people were killed during the Gujarat riots," Dave said, adding that the MP was involved here and the FIR was filed after 21 years of the massacre following the report of the Justice Nanavati Commission.

Kumar resigned from the Congress after being convicted by the High Court.

On 5 August 2019, the Apex Court announced that it would hear Kumar's plea for bail in May 2020 as it was not an "ordinary case" and called for a thorough hearing before any order was passed.

The case in which he was convicted and sentenced relates to the killing of five Sikhs in the Raj Nagar Part-I district of Delhi on 1 and 2 November 1984, and the burning of a gurdwara in Raj Nagar Part-II. 

Anti-Sikh riots broke out after the assassination of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on 31 October 1984 by her two Sikh bodyguards Satwant Singh and Beant Singh.

On 17 December, 2019, Kumar also challenged the verdict of the High Court in Delhi which awarded him life imprisonment for the "remaining of his natural life" in the 1984 anti-Sikh riot trial. 

The High Court found him guilty of Section 120 B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) (criminal conspiracy) and abdication in the commission of crimes of murder, of spreading enmity between different communities on grounds of religion, and of behaving prejudicial to the preservation of religious peace and the defiling and destruction of the gurdwara.

It also upheld the conviction and varying sentences handed down by the court to five others-former Congress Councilor Balwan Khokhar, retired naval officer Captain Bhagmal, Girdhari Lal and former MLAs Mahender Yadav and Kishan Khokhar.

The High Court had set aside the decision of the Court of Justice in 2010, which had absolved Kumar in the case.

 

Author: Harneet Singh



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

mere-use-of-word-arbitration-does-not-create-valid-arbitration-agreement-sc
Trending Judiciary
Mere Use of Word “Arbitration” Does Not Create Valid Arbitration Agreement: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that mere use of the word “arbitration” in a contract clause doesn’t constitute a valid arbitration agreement without clear intent.

08 November, 2025 01:14 PM
sc-issues-notice-on-plea-seeking-one-third-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice on Plea Seeking One-Third Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils [Read Order]

Supreme Court issues notice on plea seeking one-third reservation for women in all State Bar Councils to ensure gender equality in legal governance.

08 November, 2025 01:39 PM

TOP STORIES

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM
government-cannot-unilaterally-expand-labour-dispute-scope-without-workers-demand-himachal-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Government cannot unilaterally expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Government cannot suo motu expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand, rules Himachal Pradesh High Court, holding termination issues need separate notice.

03 November, 2025 04:21 PM
child-welfare-committee-cannot-direct-police-to-register-fir-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Welfare Committee Cannot Direct Police to Register FIR: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Child Welfare Committees cannot direct police to register FIRs, rules Allahabad High Court, holding their powers are limited to children needing care and protection.

03 November, 2025 04:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email