38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, June 22, 2024

Aadhaar Not An Absolute Proof Of Age: Punjab & Haryana HC

By LawStreet News Network      08 February, 2020 11:02 PM      0 Comments
Aadhaar Not An Absolute Proof Of Age: Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled on February 6, 2020 that Aadhar is not a “conclusive proof of age”and more credence should be given to birthand matriculation certificates.

The Division Bench of Justice Meenakshi Mehta and Daya Chaudhary said in an order, while hearing a divorce petition from Ludhiana- “These are generally considered as conclusive proof of one’s age.”

A couple came before the Family Court in Ludhiana last yearasking for divorce on mutual consent under Section 13-b Of Hindu Marriage Act. But the trial court dismissed their petition on the grounds that date of birth of wife (15.08.1987) as mentioned in her Aadhar card and the the date of marriage of couple that is 26.11.2004, shows that wife is yet to attain 18 years and is not a major. It was not a valid marriage and hence they can not invoke the provisions of the Act.

The Birth certificate which was produced before the bench showed her date of birth as 15.08.1986 which means she had completed 18 years of age. The Court further observed that the birth certificate was prepared a week after birth but Aadhar Card was prepared at a later date.   

“It being so, Mark-A (Aadhaar) cannot be said to be the conclusive proof of her age. Rather, more credence is attached to the birth certificate or matriculation certificate showing the date of birth of a person and these are generally considered as conclusive proof of one’s age”-the order reads.

Further the court said that parties have amicably settled the dispute and come to a conclusion to live separately- “the endeavour of the court in such cases should be to bring the dispute between the parties to an end on the basis of their settlement”- order said.

Divorce by Mutual Consent 

Under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955the parties can seek divorce by mutual consent by filing a petition before the court. Mutual consent means that both the parties agree for peaceful separation.

When can such divorce be filed?

Parties intending such divorce shall wait for a year after the date of marriage.

They have to show that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more before the presentation of the petition for divorce and that during this period of separation they have not been able to cohabitate like husband and wife.

Where to file the petition ?

In the family court of the city / district where both the partners lived together for the last time, which was their matrimonial home.

If either of the spouse has not being heard of, from a long time, should the divorce be applied?

If there is proof of the absence of a spouse without any information to the other spouse about his whereabouts for a continuous seven years' period, a petition should be filed in this regard in the court.


Author : Aarya Mishra

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this


Trending Crime, Police And Law
Women, including housewife, approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh

Two women approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh, citing harassment for tweets based on news reports about his involvement in high-profile cases.

17 June, 2024 03:10 PM
Trending Judiciary
Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [June 10 - June 15]

Get the latest updates from the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

17 June, 2024 03:29 PM
Trending Business
Man sues Apple for £5 million, blaming company for divorce after wife discovers ‘deleted messages’ with sex workers

A UK man sues Apple for £5M, claiming their unclear policy on deleted messages led to his divorce after his wife found texts to sex workers on another device.

17 June, 2024 04:26 PM
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Ex-Karnataka CM Yediyurappa appears before CID for POCSO case probe, with protection of 'no arrest'

Ex-Karnataka CM Yediyurappa appears before CID for POCSO case probe, denies allegations, granted ‘no arrest’ protection. Next hearing: June 28.

17 June, 2024 04:46 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email