38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, November 27, 2024
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Aadhaar Not An Absolute Proof Of Age: Punjab & Haryana HC

By LawStreet News Network      08 February, 2020 11:02 PM      0 Comments
Aadhaar Not An Absolute Proof Of Age: Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled on February 6, 2020 that Aadhar is not a conclusive proof of ageand more credence should be given to birthand matriculation certificates.

The Division Bench of Justice Meenakshi Mehta and Daya Chaudhary said in an order, while hearing a divorce petition from Ludhiana- These are generally considered as conclusive proof of ones age.

A couple came before the Family Court in Ludhiana last yearasking for divorce on mutual consent under Section 13-b Of Hindu Marriage Act. But the trial court dismissed their petition on the grounds that date of birth of wife (15.08.1987) as mentioned in her Aadhar card and the the date of marriage of couple that is 26.11.2004, shows that wife is yet to attain 18 years and is not a major. It was not a valid marriage and hence they can not invoke the provisions of the Act.

The Birth certificate which was produced before the bench showed her date of birth as 15.08.1986 which means she had completed 18 years of age. The Court further observed that the birth certificate was prepared a week after birth but Aadhar Card was prepared at a later date.   

It being so, Mark-A (Aadhaar) cannot be said to be the conclusive proof of her age. Rather, more credence is attached to the birth certificate or matriculation certificate showing the date of birth of a person and these are generally considered as conclusive proof of ones age-the order reads.

Further the court said that parties have amicably settled the dispute and come to a conclusion to live separately- the endeavour of the court in such cases should be to bring the dispute between the parties to an end on the basis of their settlement- order said.

Divorce by Mutual Consent 

Under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955the parties can seek divorce by mutual consent by filing a petition before the court. Mutual consent means that both the parties agree for peaceful separation.

When can such divorce be filed?

Parties intending such divorce shall wait for a year after the date of marriage.

They have to show that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more before the presentation of the petition for divorce and that during this period of separation they have not been able to cohabitate like husband and wife.

Where to file the petition ?

In the family court of the city / district where both the partners lived together for the last time, which was their matrimonial home.

If either of the spouse has not being heard of, from a long time, should the divorce be applied?

If there is proof of the absence of a spouse without any information to the other spouse about his whereabouts for a continuous seven years' period, a petition should be filed in this regard in the court.

 

Author : Aarya Mishra



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

75th-constitution-day-history-and-significance-of-november-26
Trending Know The Law
75th Constitution Day: History and Significance of November 26

Explore the history and significance of India’s 75th Constitution Day, celebrated on November 26, honoring justice, equality, liberty, and democracy.

26 November, 2024 01:59 PM
delhi-high-court-directs-formation-of-committee-to-address-deepfake-concerns-sets-three-months-deadline-for-report
Trending Judiciary
Delhi High Court directs formation of committee to address deepfake concerns, sets three months deadline for report [Read Order]

Delhi High Court forms a committee to address deepfake concerns, mandates a 3-month report deadline, emphasizing urgent regulation and stakeholder input.

26 November, 2024 03:59 PM

TOP STORIES

patiala-house-court-orders-attachment-of-bikaner-house-over-rs-50-lakh-dispute
Trending Judiciary
Patiala House Court Orders Attachment of Bikaner House Over Rs 50 Lakh Dispute

Patiala House Court orders Bikaner House attachment in a Rs 50L dispute, while Himachal Bhawan faces auction over a Rs 150Cr hydropower recovery case.

21 November, 2024 12:19 PM
consensual-relationship-or-breakup-cant-be-given-colour-of-criminality-sc
Trending Judiciary
Consensual relationship or breakup can't be given colour of criminality: SC [Read Judgment]

Consensual relationship or breakup can’t be termed criminal: SC quashes 2019 FIR, stating consensual relations don’t warrant prosecution for rape or intimidation.

21 November, 2024 12:25 PM
sc-to-hear-landmark-case-on-constitution-preamble-amendments-challenging-socialist-and-secular-additions
Trending Judiciary
SC to hear Landmark Case on Constitution Preamble Amendments Challenging ‘Socialist’ and ‘Secular’ Additions [Read Affidavit]

Supreme Court hears Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay’s challenge to 42nd Amendment adding ‘Socialist’ & ‘Secular’ to Preamble, questioning its constitutional validity.

22 November, 2024 10:32 AM
even-terrorist-ajmal-kasab-given-a-fair-trial-sc-on-cbis-plea-opposing-yasin-maliks-for-cross-examination-of-witnesses
Trending Judiciary
'Even terrorist Ajmal Kasab given a fair trial,' SC on CBI's plea opposing Yasin Malik's for cross examination of witnesses

Supreme Court debates CBI’s plea opposing Yasin Malik’s cross-examination of witnesses, citing Ajmal Kasab’s fair trial; suggests jail courtroom setup.

22 November, 2024 01:26 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email