38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, August 04, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Accused in custody can seek anticipatory bail in another case: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      11 September, 2024 12:03 PM      0 Comments
Accused in custody can seek anticipatory bail in another case SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has said each arrest a person faces compounds his humiliation and ignominy as it held an accused, already in custody in a criminal case, can still seek anticipatory bail in another case in which he feared his apprehension by the investigating agency.

A bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra found no express or implied restriction in the CrPC or in any other statute that prohibits the Court of Session or the High Court from entertaining and deciding an anticipatory bail application in relation to an offence, while the applicant is in custody in relation to a different offence.

"Under Section 438 of the CrPC, the pre-condition for a person to apply for pre-arrest bail is a “reason to believe that he may be arrested on an accusation of having committed a non-bailable offence”. Therefore, the only pre-condition for exercising the said right is the apprehension of the accused that he is likely to be arrested," the bench said.

The custody in one case does not have the effect of taking away the apprehension of arrest in a different case, the bench said.

The bench said, "Each arrest a person faces compounds their humiliation and ignominy. We say so because each subsequent arrest underscores a continued or escalating involvement in legal troubles that can erode the dignity of the person and their public standing."

"The initial arrest itself often brings a wave of social stigma and personal distress, as the individual struggles with the implications of their legal predicament. When a subsequent arrest occurs, it intensifies this emotional and social burden, amplifying the perception of their criminality and reinforcing negative judgments from society," the bench added.

The court opined each additional arrest exacerbated the person’s shame making the cumulative impact of such legal entanglements increasingly devastating.

The court upheld the maintainability of pre arrest bail of Amar S Mulchandani before the Bombay High Court in a separate cheating case, though he was already arrested in an ED case.

Senior advocate Sidharth Luthra, appearing for complainant Dhanraj Aswani, said the pre-condition to invoke Section 438 CrPC is that the accused should have a reason to believe that he “may be arrested”. If the accused is already in custody, then he can have no reason to believe that he “may be arrested”, he said.

Senior advocate Siddharth Dave for the respondent accused said the arrest of an accused in one case cannot foreclose his right to apply for pre-arrest bail in a different case.

In its judgment, the bench said, "No restriction can be read into Section 438 of the CrPC to preclude an accused from applying for anticipatory bail in relation to an offence while he is in custody in a different offence, as that would be against the purport of the provision and the intent of the legislature".

The court said the right of an accused to protect his personal liberty within the contours of Article 21 of the Constitution with the aid of the provision of anticipatory bail as enshrined under Section 438 of the CrPC cannot be defeated or thwarted without a valid procedure established by law

The court said the procedure should also pass the test of fairness, reasonableness and manifest non-arbitrariness on the anvil of Article 14 of the Constitution.

The bench pointed out the only restriction on the power of the court to grant anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC is the one prescribed under sub-section (4) of Section 438 of the CrPC, and in other statutes like the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, etc.

"While a person already in custody in connection with a particular offence apprehends arrest in a different offence, then, the subsequent offence is a separate offence for all practical purposes. This would necessarily imply that all rights conferred by the statute on the accused as well as the investigating agency in relation to the subsequent offence are independently protected," the bench said.

 [Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

why-so-many-students-dying-by-suicides-sc-asks-iit-kharagpur
Trending Judiciary
Why so many students dying by suicides, SC asks IIT Kharagpur

SC asks IIT Kharagpur why students are dying by suicide; raises concern amid rising campus deaths despite new mental health guidelines.

29 July, 2025 11:51 AM
sc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-dog-bite-incidents
Trending Judiciary
SC takes suo motu cognisance of dog bite incidents

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of rising dog bite cases after 6-year-old girl dies of rabies; terms media report alarming and disturbing.

29 July, 2025 01:38 PM
sc-quashes-fir-against-ace-shuttler-lakshya-sen-others-for-forging-birth-certificate
Trending Judiciary
SC quashes FIR against ace Shuttler Lakshya Sen, others for forging birth certificate [Read Judgment]

SC quashes FIR against shuttler Lakshya Sen, says forgery case based on vendetta, lacked merit and abused criminal process.

29 July, 2025 04:20 PM
supreme-court-to-hear-presidential-reference-on-bill-clearance-timelines-from-august-19
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court to Hear Presidential Reference on Bill Clearance Timelines from August 19

SC to hear Presidential Reference on timelines for Governors & President to clear Bills, from Aug 19 to Sept 10; Kerala & TN oppose maintainability.

29 July, 2025 04:43 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email