38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, December 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Adani-Hindenburg row: SC sets up committee headed by former SC-judge to probe [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      02 March, 2023 10:26 PM      0 Comments
Adani-Hindenburg row: SC sets up committee headed by former SC-judge to probe [Read Order]

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday set up a committee headed by the top court's retired judge Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre to assess extant regulatory framework in view of volatility witnessed in stock market after steep fall in share prices of Adani group of companies in the wake of US firm Hindenburg's report.

The court also asked the panel to investigate if there has been regulatory failure in dealing with the alleged contravention of laws pertaining to the securities market in relation to the Adani Group or other companies.

A bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala nominated O P Bhatt (former SBI chairman), Justice (retired) J P Devadhar, K V Kamath (former ICICI chairman), Nandan Nilekani (co founder Infosys), Somasekhar Sundaresan (advocate and securities and regulatory expert) as members of the committee.

"In order to protect Indian investors against volatility of the kind which has been witnessed in the recent past, we are of the view that it is appropriate to constitute an expert committee for the assessment of the extant regulatory framework and for making recommendations to strengthen it," the bench said.

The court framed the remit of the committee as follows:

a. To provide an overall assessment of the situation including the relevant causal factors which have led to the volatility in the securities market in the recent past;

b. To suggest measures to strengthen investor awareness;

c. To investigate whether there has been regulatory failure in dealing with the alleged contravention of laws pertaining to the securities market in relation to the Adani Group or other companies; and

d. To suggest measures to (i) strengthen the statutory and/or regulatory framework; and (ii) secure compliance with the existing framework for the protection of investors.

The court also directed the Chairperson of the Securities and Exchange Board of India to ensure that all requisite information is provided to the committee.

"All agencies of the Union Government including agencies connected with financial regulation, fiscal agencies and law enforcement agencies shall co-operate with the committee," the court ordered.

It also directed the committee to give its report in "sealed cover" within two months.

Adani group's head Gautam Adani tweeted, "The Adani Group welcomes the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. It will bring finality in a time bound manner. Truth will prevail."

The court passed its order on a batch of petitions filed by advocates Vishal Tiwari, M L Sharma, Congress leader Jaya Thakur, and one Anamika Jaiswal.

It also allowed the SEBI to continue with probe into the Adani group of companies following the report by US Short seller firm Hindenburg, alleging accounting fraud and "brazen stock manipulation".

"The constitution of the expert committee does not divest SEBI of its powers or responsibilities in continuing with its investigation into the recent volatility in the securities market," the bench said.

The court also directed as a part of its ongoing investigation, SEBI shall also investigate the following aspects of the issues raised in the present batch of petitions:

a. Whether there has been a violation of Rule 19A of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules 1957;

b. Whether there has been a failure to disclose transactions with related parties and other relevant information which concerns related parties to SEBI, in accordance with law; and

c. Whether there was any manipulation of stock prices in contravention of existing laws.

[Read Order] 

 

 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

ranveer-singhs-dhurandhar-barred-from-release-across-gulf-states-amid-content-sensitivity-concerns
Trending CelebStreet
Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar Barred from Release Across Gulf States Amid Content Sensitivity Concerns

Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar fails to secure release approval in six GCC countries amid concerns over politically sensitive content.

14 December, 2025 12:40 AM

TOP STORIES

scwla-hails-supreme-courts-historic-30-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils-a-landmark-leap-for-gender-parity-in-the-legal-profession
Trending Legal Insiders
SCWLA Hails Supreme Court’s Historic 30% Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils: A Landmark Leap for Gender Parity in the Legal Profession [Read Press Release]

Supreme Court orders 30% reservation for women in State Bar Councils; SCWLA welcomes the landmark verdict as a major step toward gender equality in the legal profession.

09 December, 2025 04:45 PM
only-central-state-employees-fall-under-section-2e-gratuity-exclusion-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Only Central, State Employees Fall Under Section 2(e) Gratuity Exclusion: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules KSBC retired abkari workers are entitled to gratuity, holding that Section 2(e) exclusion applies only to government employees.

09 December, 2025 08:28 PM
civic-bodies-have-authority-to-revise-property-tax-rates-courts-cannot-substitute-judgment-on-policy-decisions-sc
Trending Judiciary
Civic Bodies Have Authority to Revise Property Tax Rates; Courts Cannot Substitute Judgment on Policy Decisions: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds municipal autonomy to revise property tax rates, ruling that courts cannot interfere in policy decisions absent arbitrariness or illegality.

09 December, 2025 08:35 PM
hostile-witness-testimony-cannot-be-rejected-in-toto-supreme-court-reiterates-settled-legal-position
Trending Judiciary
Hostile Witness Testimony Cannot Be Rejected in Toto: Supreme Court Reiterates Settled Legal Position [Read Judgment]

Hostile witness testimony cannot be rejected entirely, the Supreme Court held, reaffirming that credible portions supporting prosecution or defence must still be considered.

09 December, 2025 08:44 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email