38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 03, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Power to Take Additional Evidence- " CrPc S. 391 Akin to Order XLI Rule 26 CPC; Appellate Court Should Use Power Sparingly ": Allahabad High Court [READ ORDER]

By Nargis Bano      31 August, 2021 02:21 PM      0 Comments
Power to Take Additional Evidence-

The Allahabad High Court recently held that powers under Section 391 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are analogous to those under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and that such powers to take additional evidence by the appellate court must be exercised sparingly.

The Bench of Justice Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava emphasised that the power exercised was discretionary and could not be used to fill gaps and lacunae in the evidence.

The case before the court

The Court was hearing the instant application under Section 482 of the CrPC to vacate the order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hathras, who had rejected the applicant's application filed before the Court under Section 391 of the CrPC for summoning certain persons as witnesses.

Facts in brief

Following a criminal trial, the applicant was convicted and sentenced by the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/JM, Hathras under sections 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

Dissatisfied with the aforementioned order, the applicant filed an appeal, and the appellate court granted an application under 391 CrPC for summoning certain witnesses and recording additional evidence during the pendency of the appeal.

Rejecting the 391 CrPC application, the appellate court noted that the appeal had been filed after a lapse of more than five years, that the appeal was not being argued, and that the application seeking summoning of witnesses had been filed solely to delay the proceedings.

It was also noted that the applicant had made no application for summoning the aforementioned individuals as witnesses during the course of the trial, and there was no justification for their summoning at the stage of appeal.

Court's Observations

The Court noted at the outset that Section 391 of the Code empowers the court to admit additional evidence at the appellate stage if it believes it is necessary.

In this regard, the Court referred to the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Rambhau and Others vs. State of Maharashtra (2001) 4 SCC 759, noting that the appellate court's power to receive additional evidence under section 391 of the Code, being an exception, must always be exercised with caution and circumspection in order to meet the ends of justice.

The Court also referred to Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh & Anr vs State Of Gujarat & Ors (2004) 4 SCC 158, in which it was held that, while the Section conferred broad discretion, the powers could not be used to fill any gaps, and the appellate court, in directing the taking of additional evidence, was required to record reasons for the same.

"The powers under the section have been held to be analogous to those under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and as a result, additional evidence cannot be tendered at the appellate stage as a matter of right, and the power to be exercised by the appellate court is to be based on discretion, sound judicial principles, and in the interest of justice. The discretion is to be used in appropriate cases, not to fill gaps and lacunae in the evidence. The appellate court's recording of reasons for taking the 7 additional evidence has been made mandatory with the salutary goal of acting as a check against an overly easy reception of evidence at a later stage of the litigation.The test to be applied is whether the evidence sought to be advanced is necessary for a just decision of the case," the Court concluded, dismissing the Accused's plea.

 

[READ ORDER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-allows-manufacturing-of-green-crackers-in-delhi-subject-to-no-sale
Trending Judiciary
SC allows manufacturing of green crackers in Delhi, subject to no sale

SC allows certified manufacturers to produce green crackers in Delhi, but bans their sale in NCR till further orders, balancing pollution and livelihoods.

27 September, 2025 01:23 AM
kerala-hc-directs-comprehensive-snakebite-prevention-guidelines-for-schools
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Directs Comprehensive Snakebite Prevention Guidelines For Schools [Read Order]

Kerala High Court directs comprehensive snakebite prevention and management guidelines for schools, ensuring safety, awareness, and emergency response.

30 September, 2025 08:46 PM
sc-orders-two-judicial-officers-to-go-for-seven-days-training-for-flawed-bail-order
Trending Judiciary
SC orders two judicial officers to go for seven days training for flawed bail order [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes flawed bail order, directs two Delhi judges to undergo 7-day special training on judicial conduct and bail rulings.

30 September, 2025 09:58 PM
sc-seeks-reply-from-iit-delhi-kharagpur-on-plea-to-transfer-student-due-to-mental-health-condition
Trending Judiciary
SC seeks reply from IIT Delhi, Kharagpur on plea to transfer student due to mental health condition [Read Order]

SC seeks reply from IIT Delhi & Kharagpur on plea for transfer of B Arch student citing mental health needs, AIIMS proximity & Article 21 rights.

30 September, 2025 11:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email