38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, June 17, 2024
Judiciary

Seeking Advanced Fee Payment for Entire Course at The Time of Admission by Medical Colleges Illegal: Rules Rajasthan HC [READ ORDER]

By Mathews Savio      02 June, 2021 05:43 PM      0 Comments
Seeking Advanced Fee Payment for Entire Course at The Time of Admission by Medical Colleges Illegal: Rules Rajasthan HC [READ ORDER]

On Monday (31/05/2021), Rajasthan High Court ruled that the practice of demanding payment of an advanced fee for the entire course at the time of taking admission to medical and dental courses is illegal.

The matter came up before the court as a Public Interest Litigation (Deepesh Singh Beniwal v. Union of India and Others) filed by a practising lawyer.

A bench comprising of Justices Rameshwar Vyas and Sangeet Lodha heard the matter.

The petitioner's case was that Private and Government Medical and Dental Colleges are demanding advanced payment of the entire course fee or bank guarantee for the same from the students at the time of admission to the course. The demand is allegedly made to cover the loss suffered by the institutions when students leave midway during their courses.

The petitioner, representing himself in the proceedings, argued that the students and parents suffer from the demand for the entire course fee at one go. Further, it was submitted that the students, who have cleared the NEET examination and granted admission based on merit, often find it challenging to source the entire course fee and are afraid to come before the court due to the fear that their education and career will be affected.

Citing the judgement of the Supreme Court in Islamic Academy of Education v. State of Karnataka, the petitioner submitted that even though the practice of seeking a bank guarantee or bond for the payment of the entire course fee is allowed by the apex court, the students in the state are not given a choice between the two alternatives. Students are always asked to pay the entire fees or submit a bank guarantee for the same. It was pointed out that banks give guarantee only if sufficient collateral is furnished with them. The banks also charge a commission for providing the guarantee, which puts an additional burden on the students and their parents, the petitioner argued.

The respondents, including several Private and Government Medical Colleges, argued that taking of bank guarantees are allowed by various judgements of the apex court and that the guarantees are necessary to ensure the financial viability of the institutions.

After hearing both parties, the court referred to several judgements of the Supreme Court like that in T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka to observe that education is a charitable endeavour and should not be done with a profit motive. The court observed that: 

“The respondent private educational institutions imparting medical education, inherently with a charitable purpose, must always take care of the students belonging to lower echelons of the society or to a middle-income group admitted to the medical courses on being found meritorious and must ensure that they are not deprived from pursuing the medical course merely on account of their inability to deposit advance fee in addition to the annual fee for one year or the bank guarantee for remaining 3½ years duration of the medical course.”

The court also observed that ordinarily, no student who has paid the high fees for one year would leave a course midway, and so there is no justification in demanding the entire course fee in advance.

The court allowed the petitioner's prayers and directed the respondents not to demand bank guarantees for the entire course fee in advance.

 

[READ ORDER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

women-including-housewife-approach-ncw-against-controversial-ips-officer-gyaneshwar-singh
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Women, including housewife, approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh

Two women approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh, citing harassment for tweets based on news reports about his involvement in high-profile cases.

17 June, 2024 03:10 PM
courts-this-week-law-street-journal-s-weekly-round-up-of-sc-anf-hcs-june-10-june-15
Trending Judiciary
Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [June 10 - June 15]

Get the latest updates from the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

17 June, 2024 03:29 PM

TOP STORIES

plea-filed-in-sc-for-fresh-neet
Trending Judiciary
Plea filed in SC for fresh NEET

Plea filed in Supreme Court seeks fresh NEET-UG 2024 exams due to alleged paper leaks and malpractices. Petitioners demand a Special Investigation Team and preventive measures.

11 June, 2024 10:49 AM
plant-30-trees-delhi-hc-orders-senior-citizen-accused-of-outraging-womans-modesty
Trending Judiciary
'Plant 30 trees', Delhi HC orders senior citizen accused of outraging woman's modesty

Plant 30 trees Delhi High Court orders senior citizen accused of outraging womans modesty

11 June, 2024 11:17 AM
no-liability-under-ni-act-for-dishonoured-cheques-of-merged-banks-presented-after-validity-period
Trending Judiciary
No liability under NI Act for dishonoured cheques of merged banks presented after validity period [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules that dishonoured cheques from merged banks presented after the validity period won't attract liability under Section 138 of the NI Act.

11 June, 2024 11:29 AM
modi-30-cabinet-full-list-of-ministers-and-their-respective-portfolios
Trending Executive
Modi 3.0 Cabinet: Full list of ministers and their respective portfolios

Modi 3.0 Cabinet: Amit Shah, S. Jaishankar, Nirmala Sitharaman, and Rajnath Singh retain key roles; allies TDP, JD(U), LJP, JD(S) secure major ministries.

11 June, 2024 03:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email