38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, November 04, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Advocate-couple Suspended from Practice for waylaying HC Judges car

By LawStreet News Network      14 August, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Advocate-couple Suspended from Practice for waylaying HC Judges car

The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry (Bar Council) has suspended from practice an advocate couple who has been accused of overtaking the car of a Madras High Court Judge and squabbling with his driver.

The Bar Council passed the order of interim suspension for 15 days on a complaint lodged by the Personal Security Officer of the judge against Advocate S. Sahul Hameed and his wife Advocate L. Shika Sarmadan and directed them to submit a written explanation.

The order stated that a necessity has arisen in public interest to place both of you under interim suspension of practice prohibiting you to practice in any court or tribunal or quasi-judicial tribunal within the territory of India until further orders to protect and uphold the confidence and faith of the people on the honble judges and judiciary.

While Mr Hameed had enrolled with the Bar Council in 2001, Ms Sarmadan had enrolled in 1999. The personal security officials claimed that the couple was agitated when the judges car, on its way to the High Court on July 30, 2018 overtook their car.

Thereafter, Advocate S. Sahul Hameed purposely chased the judges car and honked continuously. Moments later, the advocate allegedly waylaid the judges car and started scolding the driver using filthy language. This entire episode took place on a busy road at Anna Nagar.

The Bar Council has given the advocate-couple 15 days to respond to the charges while communicating this order to the Registrar General of the Madras High Court and said If no suitable explanation is received within 15 days from the date of receipt of this order, the matter will be referred to the disciplinary committee for enquiry under Section 42 of the Advocates Act, 1961.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM

TOP STORIES

lawyers-to-stop-arguing-when-court-indicates-its-mind-sc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers to stop arguing when court indicates its mind: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Lawyers must stop arguing once court indicates its mind, stressing that harmony between Bench and Bar ensures dignified court functioning.

29 October, 2025 04:25 PM
wangchuks-detention-order-suffers-from-gross-illegality-and-arbitrariness-activists-wife-tells-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wangchuk's detention order suffers from gross illegality and arbitrariness, activist's wife tells SC

Wife of activist Sonam Wangchuk tells SC his detention under NSA suffers from illegality, citing stale FIRs, procedural lapses, and denial of fair representation.

29 October, 2025 04:35 PM
police-can-register-fir-for-threatening-witness-courts-complaint-not-needed-sc
Trending Judiciary
Police can register FIR for threatening witness; court's complaint not needed: SC [Read Judgment]

SC says police can directly file FIR for witness threats under Section 195A IPC; no court complaint needed as it’s a cognisable offence.

29 October, 2025 04:44 PM
sc-hints-at-pan-india-guidelines-on-timeline-to-frame-charges
Trending Judiciary
SC hints at pan-India guidelines on timeline to frame charges

SC mulls pan-India guidelines to curb delays in framing charges; notes cases where charges aren’t framed even after years despite BNSS mandate of 60 days.

30 October, 2025 12:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email