38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, August 06, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Advocate-couple Suspended from Practice for waylaying HC Judges car

By LawStreet News Network      14 August, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Advocate-couple Suspended from Practice for waylaying HC Judges car

The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry (Bar Council) has suspended from practice an advocate couple who has been accused of overtaking the car of a Madras High Court Judge and squabbling with his driver.

The Bar Council passed the order of interim suspension for 15 days on a complaint lodged by the Personal Security Officer of the judge against Advocate S. Sahul Hameed and his wife Advocate L. Shika Sarmadan and directed them to submit a written explanation.

The order stated that a necessity has arisen in public interest to place both of you under interim suspension of practice prohibiting you to practice in any court or tribunal or quasi-judicial tribunal within the territory of India until further orders to protect and uphold the confidence and faith of the people on the honble judges and judiciary.

While Mr Hameed had enrolled with the Bar Council in 2001, Ms Sarmadan had enrolled in 1999. The personal security officials claimed that the couple was agitated when the judges car, on its way to the High Court on July 30, 2018 overtook their car.

Thereafter, Advocate S. Sahul Hameed purposely chased the judges car and honked continuously. Moments later, the advocate allegedly waylaid the judges car and started scolding the driver using filthy language. This entire episode took place on a busy road at Anna Nagar.

The Bar Council has given the advocate-couple 15 days to respond to the charges while communicating this order to the Registrar General of the Madras High Court and said If no suitable explanation is received within 15 days from the date of receipt of this order, the matter will be referred to the disciplinary committee for enquiry under Section 42 of the Advocates Act, 1961.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-to-hear-plea-on-august-8-seeking-time-bound-restoration-of-statehood-to-jammu-and-kashmir
Trending Judiciary
SC to Hear Plea on August 8 Seeking Time-Bound Restoration of Statehood to Jammu & Kashmir

SC to hear plea on Aug 8 seeking time-bound restoration of statehood to J&K, citing violation of federalism and delay despite govt assurance.

05 August, 2025 01:45 PM
sc-cancels-bail-of-ex-dhfl-promoter-dheeraj-wadhawan-in-42000-crore-bank-fraud-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Cancels Bail of Ex-DHFL Promoter Dheeraj Wadhawan in ₹42,000 Crore Bank Fraud Case

SC cancels bail of ex-DHFL promoter Dheeraj Wadhawan in ₹42,000 cr bank loan scam case; directs him to surrender within 2 weeks despite medical plea.

05 August, 2025 05:34 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-directs-telangana-speaker-to-decide-disqualification-petitions
Trending Judiciary
SC directs Telangana Speaker to decide disqualification petitions against 10 rebel BRS MLAs within 3 months [Read Order]

SC orders Telangana Speaker to decide disqualification pleas against 10 rebel BRS MLAs within 3 months, stressing swift action on political defections.

31 July, 2025 04:58 PM
sc-to-first-consider-maintainability-of-review-against-2022-judgment-on-eds-powers-under-pmla
Trending Judiciary
SC to first consider maintainability of review against 2022 judgment on ED's powers under PMLA

SC to first decide if review pleas on ED powers under PMLA are maintainable; hearing on Karti Chidambaram’s plea set for August 6.

01 August, 2025 10:58 AM
sc-recalls-may-2-judgment-scrapping-jsw-steels-resolution-plan-for-bhushan-power-and-steel-ltd
Trending Business
SC recalls May 2 judgment scrapping JSW Steel's resolution plan for Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd

SC recalls its May 2 verdict cancelling JSW Steel’s ₹19,300 Cr resolution plan for Bhushan Power; matter to be heard afresh on August 7.

01 August, 2025 11:13 AM
electronic-communication-not-valid-mode-of-service-of-notice-under-section-35-bnss-sc
Trending Judiciary
Electronic communication not valid mode of service of notice under Section 35 BNSS: SC [Read Order]

SC holds WhatsApp or email not valid for notice under Section 35 BNSS due to arrest risk; personal service required to safeguard liberty.

01 August, 2025 11:25 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email