38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, February 02, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Advocate-couple Suspended from Practice for waylaying HC Judges car

By LawStreet News Network      14 August, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Advocate-couple Suspended from Practice for waylaying HC Judges car

The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry (Bar Council) has suspended from practice an advocate couple who has been accused of overtaking the car of a Madras High Court Judge and squabbling with his driver.

The Bar Council passed the order of interim suspension for 15 days on a complaint lodged by the Personal Security Officer of the judge against Advocate S. Sahul Hameed and his wife Advocate L. Shika Sarmadan and directed them to submit a written explanation.

The order stated that a necessity has arisen in public interest to place both of you under interim suspension of practice prohibiting you to practice in any court or tribunal or quasi-judicial tribunal within the territory of India until further orders to protect and uphold the confidence and faith of the people on the honble judges and judiciary.

While Mr Hameed had enrolled with the Bar Council in 2001, Ms Sarmadan had enrolled in 1999. The personal security officials claimed that the couple was agitated when the judges car, on its way to the High Court on July 30, 2018 overtook their car.

Thereafter, Advocate S. Sahul Hameed purposely chased the judges car and honked continuously. Moments later, the advocate allegedly waylaid the judges car and started scolding the driver using filthy language. This entire episode took place on a busy road at Anna Nagar.

The Bar Council has given the advocate-couple 15 days to respond to the charges while communicating this order to the Registrar General of the Madras High Court and said If no suitable explanation is received within 15 days from the date of receipt of this order, the matter will be referred to the disciplinary committee for enquiry under Section 42 of the Advocates Act, 1961.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

vande-mataram-at-150-constitutional-reverence-judicial-restraint-and-the-limits-of-legal-nationalism
Trending Know The Law
Vande Mataram at 150: Constitutional Reverence, Judicial Restraint, and the Limits of Legal Nationalism

At 150, Vande Mataram’s constitutional status, judicial restraint, and the limits of legal nationalism reveal India’s unresolved debate on law and reverence.

28 January, 2026 12:19 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-family-pension-for-remarried-childless-widow-of-crpf-personnel-parents-not-entitled
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Family Pension for Remarried Childless Widow of CRPF Personnel; Parents Not Entitled [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court rules that a remarried childless widow of a CRPF personnel remains entitled to family pension; dependent parents have no claim under Rule 54.

28 January, 2026 03:56 PM
iran-warns-of-unprecedented-retaliation-amid-renewed-us-threats-over-nuclear-program
Trending International
Iran Warns of Unprecedented Retaliation Amid Renewed U.S. Threats Over Nuclear Program

Iran warns of unprecedented retaliation as U.S. threats over its nuclear program intensify, raising legal, diplomatic, and geopolitical concerns.

29 January, 2026 11:51 AM
india-eu-free-trade-agreement-provokes-us-rebuke-over-russian-oil-ties
Trending International
India–EU Free Trade Agreement Provokes U.S. Rebuke Over Russian Oil Ties

India and the EU seal a historic FTA, drawing sharp U.S. criticism over Russian oil ties, tariffs, and shifting global trade and geopolitical alignments.

29 January, 2026 12:07 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email