38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, July 27, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

After de-scheduling, employees who secured job under SC/ST category to be protected: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      29 August, 2024 03:17 PM      0 Comments
After de scheduling employees who secured job under SC ST category to be protected SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has come to help of a group of employees from a nationalised bank and a government undertaking slapped with a termination notice as their status as Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes was revoked in the wake of a Constitution bench decision in 2001.

A bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Sandeep Mehta said even after de-scheduling, employees who secured job under SC/ST category to be protected while setting aside the Karnataka High Court's judgments refusing any relief to them.

The court quashed the show cause notices issued to appellants K Nirmala and others, having noted that there was no dispute over the fact that the appellants obtained their caste certificates by following the due process of law.

Among the appellants, two belonged to Kotegara (SC) and two Kuruba (ST) community. Two were employees of Canara Bank while one was from Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd and another from the Oriental Insurance Co Ltd.

The bench held the appellants are entitled to protection of their services by virtue of the circular of March 29, 2003 issued by the Government of Karnataka as ratified by communication of August 17, 2005 by the Ministry of Finance.

"When these caste certificates were issued, the synonymous caste, as of the appellants had been included in the list of Scheduled Castes by virtue of the circular issued by the Government of Karnataka, albeit by exercising powers that were not vested in the State," the bench said.

The Supreme Court's Constitution bench in 'State of Maharashtra Vs Milind' in 2001 held neither the state government nor the courts have the authority to modify the list of Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribe as promulgated by the Presidential order.

The appellants contended the effect of the cancellation of the caste certificates after the judgment in Milind case would only deprive them from claiming any additional or future service benefits including promotion etc based on their reserved category status.

"Considering the fact that the caste certificates issued to the appellants under the previous inclusions made by the state government to the Scheduled Castes list, albeit under a legal misconception was not obtained through misrepresentation or fraud, the state government took the pragmatic decision to protect the employment of those individuals who had been benefited by these caste certificates obtained prior to issuance of the Government circulars dated 11th March, 2002 and 29th March, 2003," the bench said.

The bench also noted the circular of March 29, 2003 issued by the Government of Karnataka specifically extended protection to various castes, including those which were excluded in the earlier Government circular of March 11, 2002.

This subsequent circular covered the castes such as Kotegara, Kotekshathriya, Koteyava, Koteyar, Ramakshathriya, Sherugara, and Sarvegara, thus, ensuring that individuals of these castes, holding Scheduled Castes certificates issued prior to de-scheduling, would be entitled to claim protection of their services albeit as unreserved candidates for all future purposes, the bench said.

Additionally, the communication issued by the Ministry of Finance on August 17, 2005 reinforced the protective umbrella to the concerned bank employees and also saved them from departmental and criminal action, the bench noted.

The issue before the court was whether a person who joined the services of a Nationalized Bank/Government of India undertaking based on a certificate that identified him/her as belonging to a Scheduled Caste (‘SC’)/Scheduled Tribe (‘ST’) in the State of Karnataka, pursuant to the State Government's notifications, would be entitled to retain the position after the caste/tribe has been de-scheduled.

The situation has arisen on account of the State of Karnataka redesignating some castes under the list of SC/ST, inspite of the fact that this jurisdiction is exclusively conferred upon the Parliament by virtue of the scheme under Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution of India.

 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

delhi-govt-files-plea-in-sc-to-recall-2018-ban-on-older-vehicles
Trending Judiciary
Delhi govt files plea in SC to recall 2018 ban on older vehicles

Delhi govt moves SC to recall 2018 ban on 10-yr-old diesel, 15-yr-old petrol vehicles, citing lack of data and need for emission-based policy.

26 July, 2025 05:17 PM
sc-issues-guidelines-to-be-implemented-as-law-to-prevent-students-suicides
Trending Judiciary
SC issues guidelines to be implemented as law to prevent students suicides [Read Judgment]

SC issues 15-point guidelines to prevent student suicides; directs states to notify rules for coaching centres, mental health support, and monitoring.

26 July, 2025 05:30 PM

TOP STORIES

fight-your-battles-before-electorate-sc-to-ktka-govt-on-plea-against-quashing-fir-against-bjp-mp-tejaswi-surya
Trending Judiciary
'Fight your battles before electorate,' SC to Ktka govt on plea against quashing FIR against BJP MP Tejaswi Surya

SC tells K’taka to fight political battles at ballot, not court—rejects plea against HC order quashing FIR on Tejasvi Surya’s fake news tweet.

21 July, 2025 01:41 PM
sc-to-consider-on-july-22-president-reference-on-timeline-related-to-bills-passed-by-state-legislatures
Trending Judiciary
SC to consider on July 22 President reference on timeline related to Bills passed by State legislatures

SC to examine Presidential reference on July 22 over court’s power to set timelines for Governor, President on clearing state Bills.

21 July, 2025 01:46 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-centre-states-on-ashwini-upadhyays-pil-seeking-mandatory-disclosure-of-seller-details-under-consumer-protection-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice To Centre, States on Ashwini Upadhyay’s PIL Seeking Mandatory Disclosure of Seller Details Under Consumer Protection Act

SC issues notice on Ashwini Upadhyay’s PIL seeking mandatory disclosure of seller details to protect consumers under Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

21 July, 2025 04:47 PM
let-political-battles-be-fought-in-electorate-sc-refuses-to-entertain-eds-plea-against-ktka-cms-wife-in-muda-scam
Trending Judiciary
'Let political battles be fought in electorate,' SC refuses to entertain ED's plea against Ktka CM's wife in MUDA scam

SC refuses to hear ED plea against K’taka CM’s wife in MUDA scam, says political battles must be fought in the electorate, not through agencies.

21 July, 2025 04:56 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email