38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, February 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Asks Government to Allow Only Aisle and Window Seating in Domestic Flights

By Ishita Joshi      27 May, 2020 05:19 PM      0 Comments
Aisle and Window Seating

The Supreme Court on 25th May 2020, heavily reprimanded the Government for starting domestic flight operations and allowing ticket seat bookings on the middle seats of the airplane. It warned the Government that it should prioritize the health of the citizens over the health of its airlines. 

The Apex Court was hearing a plea by Air India and Government that had challenged an order by Bombay High Court stating middle seats must be kept vacant for international non- operational flights to bring back stranded Indian Citizens. 

Air India Pilot Deven Yogesh Kanani appealed to Bombay High Court stating safety reasons for non- scheduled international flights for bringing back stranded Indians stuck overseas. The Supreme Court widened the scope of the notification to all flights along with domestic and international flights. It also addressed to the Government that it was common sense to ensure social distancing. 

It mentioned that sitting shoulder to shoulder in flights can be harmful. The Top Court, while widening the scope of the notification from beyond non- scheduled flights bringing back stranded Indians to also include domestic flights, stated that Directorate General of Civil Aviation is free to alter any norms, during the pendency of the matter, in the interest of public health and safety of passengers, rather than commercial considerations. 

Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) is a statutory body formed under Aircraft (Amendment) Bill, 2020. The work of this directorate is to investigate aviation incidents and accidents. The headquarters of this directorate is along Shri Aurobindo Marg, opposite Safdarjung Airport in New Delhi. The central government is of the thought to replace the organization with a Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) which is modeled on the lines of the American Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The Lok Sabha has recently passed the Aircraft (Amendment) Bill, 2020 which seeks to amend the Aircraft Act, 1934 which regulates the manufacture, possession, use, operation, sale, import, and export of civil aircraft and licensing of aerodromes. 

The said Bill provides statutory status to regulatory institutions such as the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS), the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), and the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB). The bill also proposes to increase the amount of fine for violations of rules from Rs. 10 lakhs to Rs. 1 crore for aviation players. The Aircraft Act, 1934 exempted aircrafts belonging to the military, naval, or air forces of the Union. The Aircraft (Amendment) Bill, 2020 expands this exemption to include aircrafts belonging to any other armed forces other than the three mentioned. 

The Supreme Court also sarcastically questioned the government, Will the virus know it's on a plane and is not supposed to infect? It, however, gave relaxation of 10 days till 6th June 2020, to allow seating in the middle row, given the emergency nature of Vande- Bharat non- scheduled flights to bring back stranded Indians. 

The SC order reads, Air India should be allowed to operate the non-scheduled flights with the middle seats booking up to 6th June 2020. However, after that, the Air India will operate non-scheduled flights in accordance with the interim order to be passed by the Bombay High Court. 

 

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

gauhati-hc-quashes-case-against-influencer-who-claimed-assamese-women-practise-black-magic-and-convert-men-into-animals
Trending Judiciary
Gauhati HC Quashes Case Against Influencer Who Claimed Assamese Women Practise Black Magic and Convert Men Into Animals [Read Order]

Gauhati High Court quashes case against influencer Abhishek Kar over remarks on black magic in Assam, holds offences under BNS, IT Act not made out.

11 February, 2026 03:08 PM
high-courts-cannot-nullify-arbitration-proceedings-while-substituting-arbitrators-sc
Trending Judiciary
High Courts Cannot Nullify Arbitration Proceedings While Substituting Arbitrators: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules High Courts cannot nullify arbitration proceedings while appointing substitute arbitrators under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration Act.

11 February, 2026 03:58 PM

TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email