38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, January 14, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

[Anti CAA Protest] Withdrawal of Pleas Against Name And Shame Ordinance And Filing Of Fresh Pleas Challenging The Act Allowed By Allahabad High Court

By Bakul      03 September, 2020 02:58 PM      0 Comments
AllahabadHC anti CAA

The anti-CAA protest was a massive protest which caused huge loss to the property and lives of the people. Lucknow, the capital of Uttar Pradesh faced some major destruction of public property. The UP government erected banners in public places with the names, photographs, and addresses of persons accused of committing violence during anti - CAA protests. 

This action of the UP government was questioned by the High Court upon its legality after which the government promulgated an ordinance in March namely Uttar Pradesh Recovery of Damages to Public and Private Properties Ordinance, 2020 which is now converted into a Bill on August 22 and is pending before the Governor Anandiben Patel for the consent. 

A petition was filed challenging the Ordinance by Advocates Shashwat Anand and Ankur Azad practicing lawyers in High Court with a journalist and a social activist. 

They contended that this field is already covered under the Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984, hence it automatically becomes repugnant to the same which makes it void as per Article 254 of the Constitution of India. However, this petition and all other petitions related to it became infructuous with the Bill being passed. 

On Monday (August 31, 2020), the Senior Advocate for State Government Manish Goyal had told the court that the Ordinance was made an Act with some changes in it. The petition filed by the Senior Advocate was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court and the court gave the liberty to withdraw the plea and file a fresh plea challenging the Act. 

The petitioners are now granted the right to file a fresh plea against the Act by withdrawing their prior appeal on the Ordinance.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-directs-centre-to-verify-aibe-status-of-empanelled-supreme-court-lawyers-orders-policy-formulation
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Directs Centre to Verify AIBE Status of Empanelled Supreme Court Lawyers; Orders Policy Formulation

Delhi High Court gives Centre 8 weeks to verify AIBE status of 650 empanelled Supreme Court lawyers and directs formulation of a transparent empanelment policy.

08 January, 2026 12:24 AM
delhi-hc-rejects-civil-suit-challenging-cirp-affirms-nclts-exclusive-jurisdiction-under-ibc
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Rejects Civil Suit Challenging CIRP, Affirms NCLT’s Exclusive Jurisdiction Under IBC [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court dismisses civil suit challenging CIRP, holds NCLT has exclusive jurisdiction under IBC, bars parallel civil proceedings.

08 January, 2026 12:37 AM
sc-orders-release-of-accused-detained-under-nsa-in-caste-based-humiliation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders Release of Accused Detained Under NSA in Caste-Based Humiliation Case [Read Order]

Supreme Court orders release of accused detained under NSA in a caste-based humiliation case and stays Madhya Pradesh High Court’s preventive detention directions.

08 January, 2026 01:25 AM
sc-grants-bail-to-amtek-auto-promoter-in-money-laundering-case-holds-prolonged-incarceration-without-trial-progress-violates-article-21
Trending Judiciary
SC Grants Bail to Amtek Auto Promoter in Money Laundering Case; Holds Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Progress Violates Article 21 [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court grants bail to Amtek Auto promoter Arvind Dham, holding prolonged incarceration without trial progress violates the right to speedy trial under Article 21.

08 January, 2026 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email